I don't like what MS is doing, to be honest. I think they are trying to disrupt the market since they can't get a win in the usual way the market works, but I personally believe it will devolve into low value games intended to act as filler for the subscription service. As such I don't think they will keep Bethesda's games with the same type of investment and time to develop (even if I personally didn't play them, but I liked the philosophy of making single player games).
However, HOWEVER, the term "anti-consumer" is really vague and no one really knows what it means. To most people, or at least in forums and such, it simply means "something I don't like". To some other people, it means "I should get everything for free or as cheap as a couple of cups of coffee", which is a silly mentality, as creating this stuff costs money and if we want more products like it, companies need to recoup their investment and make a profit.
So, it's a nebulous term and personally I mostly see it when people want to appear smarter than they actually are or make their point have more importance than it actually does. Does it suck that we PS fans won't get Bethesda's games? For sure. Was it "Anti-Consumer"? I don't know.