• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

INCEPTION |OT| Movie of the Forever

Status
Not open for further replies.
Neuromancer said:
Yeah I'm the same way.

After the movie I just said, I'm going to have to think about this one a little, I'm not sure how I feel about it. When in reality, I just didn't really like it that much. I didn't dislike it as much as you though, by the sounds of it.
I actually did like the movie. I can't say I wasn't entertained... I just probably dislike the intensity of the positivity its getting more than you. :lol
 
BobsRevenge said:
I actually did like the movie. I can't say I wasn't entertained... I just probably dislike the intensity of the positivity its getting more than you. :lol
Probably... I was just happy to see Christopher Nolan do something other than Batman again. :lol

On an unrelated note, I think my dad would like this movie because there was a
"snow level." (Every video game I show him, he asks me if there's a "snow level" and wants to see it. :lol)
 
BobsRevenge said:
Like, for instance, actually presents real characters and puts them into a situation. Take A Serious Man. A fairly chill tone is presented. The main character is basically living his life as anyone would. Trying to be a good man. And then his life starts falling apart. As if it was always going to but he never saw it coming. He goes to rabbis in an attempt to find meaning in it, but he finds none. Sometimes the world just isn't fair.

It ultimately presents this nihilistic view of the world and asks you, how could this not be true? None of the characters or situations are unrealistic. They all could happen, and there's no reason they shouldn't.

How is that not more challenging, interesting, and important than what Inception attempts? The Coen brothers directed A Serious Man almost without flaw, and it presents itself simply.

Yet that movie has a 7.3/10 on imdb. Not something to get hung up on, but just a point of comparison.

That sort of thing is what I mean by something important. Says something that might affect you. Change the way you live, or perceive a moment. If subtly.

A Serious Man even presents dreams more accurately than Inception goddamnit! Where's the justice!?

A Serious Man's message wasn't important, it was just redundant; it didn't shed light on some great truth about life, it's only telling people what they already knew.
 
Blader5489 said:
A Serious Man's message wasn't important, it was just redundant; it didn't shed light on some great truth about life, it's only telling people what they already knew.

This. In the end, it's all subjective. Probably more people nowadays are going to take more away from Inception than they would from A Serious Man. Remember that most people go to watch movies to "escape" the reality that they're living in, not watch somebody else's.


GhaleonEB said:
giteshpandya

$8.9M WED for Inception, -9%, $91.6M total. I see it reaching $100M today.​
Declining, but that's still a monster of a Wednesday figure.

This is awesome news. But it can only suffer like 5% drop today if it actually wants to hit that $100M mark. If it comes out to $99.89M, I'm gonna be pissed. :lol
 
Blader5489 said:
A Serious Man's message wasn't important, it was just redundant; it didn't shed light on some great truth about life, it's only telling people what they already knew.
I concur. And a blatant Oscar attempt if I have ever seen one; American Beauty done it much better anyway and I love that movie to bits.
 
nemesun said:
Oh please, I just can imagine you standing outside the theater; and every time you hear somebody say "OMG, Amazing.. It's up there with the best" "Yeah, one of my fav of all time" you jump out in front of 'em "Sorry to break it to you, but its not!!!!!!!"

I'd be tempted to myself. I heard some pretty awful things while standing in like for Inception at the midnight showing, things that no fan of films should have to hear.
 
Blader5489 said:
A Serious Man's message wasn't important, it was just redundant; it didn't shed light on some great truth about life, it's only telling people what they already knew.
Most people don't know that. Go around asking people what the meaning of life is and see how many people say "Nothing." It doesn't shed light on some great truth about life. It sheds light on the fact that there is no great truth about life. :D

Its certainly worth saying more than "Look at this huge complex thing I built out of these blocks. How cool is that shit!?"

Its also not redundant. The movie doesn't have any fat to trim. How else could it push its point home with that ending? Oh my god, how was that ending not awesome? Its just as much of a punch in the face as the ending to Inception, except it actually means something.
 
harSon said:
I'd be tempted to myself. I heard some pretty awful things while standing in like for Inception at the midnight showing, things that no fan of films should have to hear.
BobsRevenge and his folks were in town.
 
BobsRevenge said:
Most people don't know that. Go around asking people what the meaning of life is and see how many people say "Nothing." It doesn't shed light on some great truth about life. It sheds light on the fact that there is no great truth about life. :D

Then these are people who simply don't want to think that way. Someone who believes there's a divine purpose to their life isn't going to watch A Serious Man and suddenly think, "Hey, maybe my life is meaningless after all."

Its certainly worth saying more than "Look at this huge complex thing I built out of these blocks. How cool is that shit!?"

I wasn't saying anything in relation to whatever message Inception has, I was just solely refuting your point on A Serious Man.

Its also not redundant. The movie doesn't have any fat to trim. How else could it push its point home with that ending? Oh my god, how was that ending not awesome? Its just as much of a punch in the face as the ending to Inception, except it actually means something.

I wasn't talking about within the context of the film, but in general; the movie doesn't you tell you something you don't already know, hence redundant.
 
nemesun said:
I concur. And a blatant Oscar attempt if I have ever seen one; American Beauty done it much better anyway and I love that movie to bits.
Those movies don't have the same message. A Serious Man is much more spartan in its message, and more nihilistic.

Look at the ending lines:

A Serious Man:
Hey, Fagle! Fagle, I got your... *looks up at massive tornado coming at them*

vs.

American Beauty:
I had always heard your entire life flashes in front of your eyes the second before you die. First of all, that one second isn't a second at all, it stretches on forever, like an ocean of time... For me, it was lying on my back at Boy Scout camp, watching falling stars... And yellow leaves, from the maple trees, that lined our street... Or my grandmother's hands, and the way her skin seemed like paper... And the first time I saw my cousin Tony's brand new Firebird... And Janie... And Janie... And... Carolyn. I guess I could be pretty pissed off about what happened to me... but it's hard to stay mad, when there's so much beauty in the world. Sometimes I feel like I'm seeing it all at once, and it's too much, my heart fills up like a balloon that's about to burst... And then I remember to relax, and stop trying to hold on to it, and then it flows through me like rain and I can't feel anything but gratitude for every single moment of my stupid little life... You have no idea what I'm talking about, I'm sure. But don't worry... you will someday.

Both are excellent though, and they both have something worth saying.

Don't write off movies that actually try to be important as Oscar attempts. Of course they want to win one. That's the way those movies become successful. And the academy wants to nominate those movies because they want them to be successful. Its the rubbing of backs that keeps more artistic movies going as economically viable. That doesn't take away from the impact of a movie even a little.

How could you think any less of the Coen Brothers and Sam Mendes?
 
BobsRevenge said:
Those movies don't have the same message. A Serious Man is much more spartan in its message, and more nihilistic.

Look at the ending lines:

A Serious Man:
Hey, Fagle! Fagle, I got your... *looks up at massive tornado coming at them*

vs.

American Beauty:
I had always heard your entire life flashes in front of your eyes the second before you die. First of all, that one second isn't a second at all, it stretches on forever, like an ocean of time... For me, it was lying on my back at Boy Scout camp, watching falling stars... And yellow leaves, from the maple trees, that lined our street... Or my grandmother's hands, and the way her skin seemed like paper... And the first time I saw my cousin Tony's brand new Firebird... And Janie... And Janie... And... Carolyn. I guess I could be pretty pissed off about what happened to me... but it's hard to stay mad, when there's so much beauty in the world. Sometimes I feel like I'm seeing it all at once, and it's too much, my heart fills up like a balloon that's about to burst... And then I remember to relax, and stop trying to hold on to it, and then it flows through me like rain and I can't feel anything but gratitude for every single moment of my stupid little life... You have no idea what I'm talking about, I'm sure. But don't worry... you will someday.

Both are excellent though, and they both have something worth saying.

Don't write off movies that actually try to be important as Oscar attempts. Of course they want to win one. That's the way those movies become successful. And the academy wants to nominate those movies because they want them to be successful. Its the rubbing of backs that keeps more artistic movies going as economically viable. That doesn't take away from the impact of a movie even a little.

How could you think any less of the Coen Brothers and Sam Mendes?
I have Jewish relatives and most of them have seen that movie and their overall conclusion was that although Serious Man reminiscent with some aspect of their childhood years, and to some extent people they know in RL; the movie was a bloated narcissistic view of Jewish culture that had no bearing on its overall message.
American Beauty on the other hand is truly a masterpiece that can not even be mentioned in a same breath as Serious Man. 7.3 is a right average for Serious Man.
 
With regards to American Beauty, it didn't even feel that shamelessly oscar-bait-y up until that part at the very end - which was hugely predictable (and classic Hollywood) but thankfully Kevin Spacey's performance really grounds that brief moment of complete stupidity. Other than that, I'd say just because American Beauty and a Serious Man are both good films that are somewhat lower budget doesn't make them automatic oscar-bait. Something like Brothers? Crash? That's Oscar bait. These are legitimately good movies that don't need a stupid and arbitrary label - Mendes and the Coen Brothers will find an audience regardless of whether they win an Oscar or not.

And as a side note, I thought A Serious Man was good, not great.
 
Neuromancer said:
Probably... I was just happy to see Christopher Nolan do something other than Batman again. :lol

Umm he has done only 2 Batman movies compared to his 5 non Batman movies.

I go see the movie tomorrow night so I can't comment. I might dislike it. I might love it. But why does the movie have to say something important to be one of the best ever? Star Wars is one of the best movies ever. So is Jaws. So are many other countless movies which compared to movies like A Serious Man or American Beauty do not say much about life. Its all subjective but the movie does not have to open your eyes to some hidden truth. It can be just entertaining to the point it one of the best to ever do it.
 
nemesun said:
Jesus me boy, that post was quite spoilerfic. Glad you enjoyed it nonetheless.

Yeah sorry about that, I was a bit over eager to reply to the general discussion here after just seeing the film. Anyone can feel free to read what I posted in the spoiler thread once they've seen the film for themselves :D
 
Ok, first of all, i loved the movie! saw it last weekend and i'm still thinking about it. i can't wait for this to come on bluray and listen to nolan's commentary because i have some questions... maybe you guys can answer for me.

towards the end, they said something about killing the japanese guy in the 3rd stage will put him in limbo or null state? so if killing yourself in limbo woke you up, why didn't the japanese guy just killed himself from the start to wake up?

at the end, did leo and japanese guy kill themselves to wake up in the plane?
 
I don't remember this part in Inception


425.LeonardoDiCaprio.tg.072210.jpg
 
Solo said:
Inception is one of the greatest movies of 2010. Lets leave the "ever" part at the door though.
Sir, I disagree.
There is no room for your logic here!
 
nemesun said:
:lol One of my favorite films "Umquam" eat your heart out Solo. Woody Allen is pure gold, the ending always gets me ;(

He also had the rare ability to make New York look like Iowa demographically
 
macfoshizzle said:
Ok, first of all, i loved the movie! saw it last weekend and i'm still thinking about it. i can't wait for this to come on bluray and listen to nolan's commentary because i have some questions... maybe you guys can answer for me.

towards the end, they said something about killing the japanese guy in the 3rd stage will put him in limbo or null state? so if killing yourself in limbo woke you up, why didn't the japanese guy just killed himself from the start to wake up?

at the end, did leo and japanese guy kill themselves to wake up in the plane?
because limbo is so deep that you can come to believe it's real
 
This film was simply disgusting.

Easily the best film I have seen in years. How Nolan wrote this is beyond comprehension. You could never get this to work as a book. This was made for film only.

Amazing.
 
Skiptastic said:
To be honest, from what I've seen this year, that was a very easy hurdle to clear. But I agree.

Kick Ass, Shutter Island, Iron Man 2, Toy Story 3...I don't know how many good movies people are expecting for half a year
 
avaya said:
This film was simply disgusting.

Easily the best film I have seen in years. How Nolan wrote this is beyond comprehension. You could never get this to work as a book. This was made for film only.

Amazing.
I imagine it took him 1 year to write and 7 years to cover the plot holes inherent in such an incomprehensible premise.
 
BobsRevenge said:
I imagine it took him 1 year to write and 7 years to cover the plot holes inherent in such an incomprehensible premise.
Fuck me, now you're openly trolling. Give it a rest already. it's like you can smell a fresh lamb; as soon as someone leaves a fresh review you have to come in and force it down his/her throat.
 
Blader5489 said:
Give it a rest already.
Maybe that's what Nolan should've done after he realized his script wouldn't work.

jesus christ what am i doing here
 
Just got back from it. Best movie I have seen in a long time. Absolutely loved it!

Also really glad I knew pretty much nothing about it, having changed channels whenever the trailers were shown on TV. Damn, now I am debating wether to see it in IMAX while I can.

Edit: Also the soundtrack was fucking awesome!
 
GrumpyAlien said:
Just got back from it. Best movie I have seen in a long time. Absolutely loved it!

Also really glad I knew pretty much nothing about it, having changed channels whenever the trailers were shown on TV. Damn, now I am debating wether to see it in IMAX while I can.
That's probably what Nolan was doing when he was writing the script.
Might as well say it before BobsRevenge shows up and give us his filth/agenda-free opinion on the latest review
 
avaya said:
This film was simply disgusting.

Easily the best film I have seen in years. How Nolan wrote this is beyond comprehension. You could never get this to work as a book. This was made for film only.

Amazing.

I'm really not sure what to make of this post. :lol

Anyway, thought this was cool.

'Inception' Stars Reveal Secrets Behind Epic Van Scene
Cillian Murphy, Ken Watanabe and Dileep Rao describe the scene that took 'months, off and on' to shoot.


MTV said:
"Inception" is one of those movies that's impossible to talk about with people who haven't seen it and desperately want to avoid spoilers. To discuss any given scene in this thriller about the world of dreams — no matter where it takes place in the story, no matter how minor it might seem on the surface — you have to reveal whole swaths of plot secrets.

But the mere fact that we want to talk about "Inception" — however tricky it may be — speaks to just how mind-bending Christopher Nolan's epic really is. Thus, when MTV News hit the red carpet premiere for "Inception" on Tuesday, we had to ask the stars to reveal the secrets behind some of our favorites scenes. Read on for some insight, but turn back now if you want to avoid some meaty spoilers!

First some setup: In "Inception," Leonardo DiCaprio heads a team that can enter another person's dreams and either steal a secret or implant a memory without the person ever knowing. For their big mission, they create a series of three different dream worlds, each existing independently yet connected by a subconscious thread. In each successive dream level, time moves progressively slower, so that what only takes, say, five seconds on level one takes maybe 60 minutes on level three.

Still with us? OK, that brings us to a wicked chase scene on level one. DiCaprio and his team hop in a van as they flee some nameless assassins. As they drive, they descend to the second dream level but continue to exist in the van, so during a few-minute chase sequence, hours and hours pass on dream levels two and three — leading up to a point where the van plunges off a bridge and takes about an hour to hit the water. The van's descent in super-slow motion was a massive undertaking to film, the "Inception" stars told us at the premiere.

"Months, off and on," said Dileep Rao, whose character drives the rest of DiCaprio's team in the van. "We'd shoot it one day, go off and shoot something else. Then shoot another piece of [the van]. It was so complex and there were so many locations and so many different moves I have to do. It's the stuff that makes or breaks that last sequence."

To capture that last sequence of the van falling off the bridge, Rao said, "they shot [the van] out of a cannon."

The shots of the actors suspended within the van in slow motion took a "whole day shooting and seven times to take," co-star Ken Watanabe recalled.

Eventually, the van lands and sinks under water. "The underwater stuff was challenging because the default setting is to panic," Cillian Murphy explained. "And when they ask you to act, it's a bit of an ask."

The actors had to hold their breath for "four or five minutes" as they sucked air from scuba tanks, Murphy said.

But they pulled off the sequences, and trust us when we tell you it is one the coolest things you've ever seen on the big screen.

"[Nolan] was very precise with us, and we nailed it," said Rao. "I think it was awesome."
 
I just saw it again, yes it is one of the best movies I have ever seen. This is one of MY new favorites. I think it is a sci-fi classic and it will be talked about for a long time.
 
Solo said:
Inception is one of the greatest movies of 2010. Lets leave the "ever" part at the door though.

Apart from Inception and Toy Story 3, what are the other 'great' movies this year? A Prophet and How to Train Your Dragon? Shutter Island, Kick-Ass and The Ghost Writer would qualify as good I guess.
 
Oh no... people have taken to comparing a new film I really love with one from last year I really love.

I do think A Serious Man is a better film than Inception, but there's no need to put down one in favor of the other. Both are fantastic.
 
Ghost Writer was a good film, but it didn't seem as memorable. I also felt that for the ending,
The audience should've discovered the "twist" when Ruth reads the letter, so that the suspense and tension of the note passing scene would be tenfold
.

I enjoyed Shutter Island a lot. I also thought that Green Zone was quite solid.

Hopefully the next half of the year isn't as horrible as the first. Here is hoping that the new Coen Brothers film, Fincher film, e.t.c. are top quality.
 
Ignatz Mouse said:
Oh no... people have taken to comparing a new film I really love with one from last year I really love.

I do think A Serious Man is a better film than Inception, but there's no need to put down one in favor of the other. Both are fantastic.
No one putting down your favorite movie, it was BobsRevenge as usual who brought knife to gun fight, it's like me discussing Schindler's list in Avatar thread. fucking stupid ass comparison but you can't help avoiding it in this thread. I wonder if in 68 people compared Chitty Chitty Bang Bang to Space Odyssey.....
 
nemesun said:
No one putting down your favorite movie, it was BobsRevenge as usual who brought knife to gun fight, it's like me discussing Schindler's list in Avatar thread. fucking stupid ass comparison but you can't help avoiding it in this thread. I wonder if in 68 people compared Chitty Chitty Bang Bang to Space Odyssey.....
It isn't a stupid comparison. I'm trying curb people's reactions to more reasonable levels is all. Maybe in a forced way... but still. Someone asked me what is a movie with importance or meaning and that was the first one that came to mind.

The fact that you make those stark comparison's yourself shows I'm at least a little effective! :D

You guys are lucky I didn't care enough about OT to come for the Avatar and District 9 threads, or else I'd have been annoying you guys there too. :lol :lol

I look at the metacritic page for those movies when I feel like I need to let out a good cry.
 
Timbuktu said:
Apart from Inception and Toy Story 3, what are the other 'great' movies this year? A Prophet and How to Train Your Dragon? Shutter Island, Kick-Ass and The Ghost Writer would qualify as good I guess.
Not to him, nor to many other people. I believe he said The Ghost Writer is the best movie of 2010 to him till this moment, so he probably would count that as great.
 
BobsRevenge said:
It isn't a stupid comparison. I'm trying curb people's reactions to more reasonable levels is all. Maybe in a forced way... but still. Someone asked me what is a movie with importance or meaning and that was the first one that came to mind.

The fact that you make those stark comparison's yourself shows I'm at least a little effective! :D

You guys are lucky I didn't care enough about OT to come for the Avatar and District 9 threads, or else I'd have been annoying you guys there too. :lol :lol

I look at the metacritic page for those movies when I feel like I need to let out a good cry.
Good god man, you're the Armond White of Neogaf. Even artsy folks don't want you on their side.. I don't even want to know what you think of La Strada.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom