Zumblakladla
Banned
Can't agree coz becuase of my backlog I can't decide what to play :s
Even Skyrim is on that list...
Even Skyrim is on that list...
I sometimes call it my backlog, but honestly using that term makes it seem like a chore. I have a game LIBRARY. I have a large variety of games to choose from when I'm in the mood to play something. It's not a list I have to check off, it's a collection I can peruse at my leisure.
I sometimes call it my backlog, but honestly using that term makes it seem like a chore. I have a game LIBRARY. I have a large variety of games to choose from when I'm in the mood to play something. It's not a list I have to check off, it's a collection I can peruse at my leisure.
That's TRUE. Game library has a more of a positive annotation to it.
I view my backlog as a library and play what I want when I want and no one else has to like it or approve. Some people always have an emotional response in these threads to what someone on the internet does with their time/hobby/money that affects them in no way whatsoever, which is more worrisome than whether I ever get around to playing all my games.
I disagree. I think the ideal is to have NO backlog.
3 game backlog is ok.
300 game backlog is not.
Those of us on Steam and/or iOS have backlogs well over 300 games.
Well then, I don't have a backlog. I have a collection of games I can play sometime in the future if I feel like it!
Are you referring to your unplayed games?
I've always thought of my "library" as games I've already completed, and all the untouched games I own as my "backlog." If you are able to treat your unplayed games the exact same as a library of completed games, then I would agree there is no harm in a backlog (other than potentially wasted money). Though there is no benefit either.
I certainly couldn't do that though. There was always the pressure to hurry up and complete my current game so I could get to the next one.
Nobody should ever consider a backlog a problem. It means you have very first world problems and live comfortably enough to afford a backlog in the first place. Be a little appreciative of your position in life.
Original Deus Ex? I'd go with that one, it holds up perfectly and it's a masterpiece.While we're on the subject of backlogs, I have some free time coming up.
Should I play Fallout New Vegas or Deus Ex?
3 game backlog is ok.
300 game backlog is not.
Those of us on Steam and/or iOS have backlogs well over 300 games.
While we're on the subject of backlogs, I have some free time coming up.
Should I play Fallout New Vegas or Deus Ex?
While I'm not against having a Backlog, I agree with the Steam thing. I look at my Steam library and think "Why the fuck do I have 90% of this shit? I have zero interest in most of it."
I know sales convince people to buy stuff they wouldn't otherwise, but I'm still amazed that people actually do. I only buy games I actually want and intend to play, not just because it's cheap. I have a handful of games on Steam I will probably never play, and those came in bundles with games I actually wanted. Like Burn Zombie, Burn. (Which I actually DID play a little bit of. I decided to go through every game on my Steam list and play it for at least a half hour to weed out those few games I have no interest in. That was one of them. I did not have any illusions going into it that I would enjoy it, but it was actually worse than I had imagined.)
While we're on the subject of backlogs, I have some free time coming up.
Should I play Fallout New Vegas or Deus Ex?
Deus EX...
i have over 200 games in my backlog... should take me up until the new gen gets a price drop and console redesigns/slimming
Also the idea that I may die before I get through my backlog is oddly hilarious to me. It is like a dumb version of the author who dies before his saga is complete. Sometimes the collection is the part I enjoy as much as actually playing them.