Before playing it I was waiting for a “complete edition” of FFXV which would have everything included on the disc since the Royal Edition does not, guess that won’t be happening will it?
Maybe he's really good at touch typing???Does anyone ever wonder how Jason uses Twitter when his head is up Activision's ass? Does he give his assistant hand signals and she tweets for him or something?
This is a dumb sentiment. I actually compared Battlefield 1/4's Premium content versus Battlefield 1942/Battlefield 2's expansion content and it turned out that that Battlefield 1/4 Premium actually had more maps, weapons, vehicles and game modes than what the booster and expansion packs brought to the table value-wise. Despite the significantly higher fidelity and the resources poured into making them, Battlefield 1/4's DLC was a better value than the beloved expansion packs. As for single player games, I remember buying crappy expansion packs just as I have bought DLC that has blown me away. Every release should be judged on its own merit and the nostalgia surrounding retail expansion packs is weird because if we could have acquired major content releases without them having to manufacture and ship out retail copies and for us, without leaving our homes like we do now, we would've been all over that. It just wasn't feasible back then.Just launch the game as it should, complete.
The expansions must be as before, complete and unique, not pieces DLC Shit.
Considering that a really low percentage of people even finish most games and that most DLC takes place after or late in the main narrative, this is not at all surprising.
IMO you don't know what you're talking about. This is true in some cases, but very little DLC is something that was merely cut from the main game.Good, DLC should just die. DLC imo are CUT content.
Somebody clearly knows nothing about game development.It makes sense. In the case of DLC you are artificially restricting yourself to the games install base. With a standalone game you do just as much additional work as a DLC but are only restricted to the install base of the platform.
My expactations of dlc is ruined after the witcher dlc..
You mean Blood and Wine?Curious how well Hearts of Stone and Iron & Blood did for for CD Projekt.
Somebody clearly knows nothing about game development.
DLC requires nowhere near the amount of work needed to make a standalone game. For DLC, you have most if not all of the available assets from the main game, there is little to no tech development and thus very little bug fixing.
I bet it did well. I also bet Skyrim and Oblivion dlc did well too.Wonder how well Witcher 3 expansions sold.
You mean Blood and Wine?
Off-topic but that game is amazing, in the worst possible ways.Maybe he was just playing that fantastic D&D PS1 fighter and got mixed up?
Good, DLC should just die. DLC imo are CUT content.