The cloud gives you 33% more hours a day.
I laughed..
Then I saw your avatar.
On Guard!!!
The cloud gives you 33% more hours a day.
Thanks for the update.
Email? Don't suppose you could copy and paste the response?
Inside sources?
Why would third parties be unhappy about the new approach to used games, lending games, et cetera? They'll be delighted, it's consumers that should be angry.
No money if no one buys the system because of internet requirements though. Particularly, families with multiple kids.
That is a weird statement to make. Publishers not happy about curbing used games??
Publishers are the reason Microsoft implemented this feature to begin with. While there will always be exceptions, publishers will be more than happy to develop for the Xbox One where used games won't eat into their bottom line. Their investors will be even more happy.
Because it's only favors the Haves. The pool of money being spent is finite. And if gamers can't recycle games, they'll buy less. And choose surer things. This benefits the AAAA titles. The CoD, Maddens, and Battlefields will get even more sales now. Everyone who's not a slam duck, will see their sales shrink. It's not that difficult to see why some wouldn't be all that thrilled at a redistribution that's going to favor the rich IPs even more.
Because it's only favors the Haves. The pool of money being spent is finite. And if gamers can't recycle games, they'll buy less. And choose surer things. This benefits the AAAA titles. The CoD, Maddens, and Battlefields will get even more sales now. Everyone who's not a slam duck, will see their sales shrink. It's not that difficult to see why some wouldn't be all that thrilled at a redistribution that's going to favor the rich IPs even more.
That is a weird statement to make. Publishers not happy about curbing used games??
Publishers are the reason Microsoft implemented this feature to begin with. While there will always be exceptions, publishers will be more than happy to develop for the Xbox One where used games won't eat into their bottom line. Their investors will be even more happy.
Sony can do what they want, no big publisher is in the position to ignore them because they depend on them. PS is roughly 50% of the console market, most publisher would be dead in the water without PS sales.
Many studios particularly big ones are also pissed at used games so odds are most will support microsoft
...........at first, because if gamers don't buy the XO nor its games sales will shift development to the PS4.
I completely disagree. I see around 600+ kids a week at my job. Ages 6-12. All they talk about is minecraft on Xbox. I mean it's the ONLY thing they talk about. I assume they all play online together, but I have no idea. I think the new Xbox is a given for these kids as Christmas gifts, even before they start begging for them.I know a lot of 'average families' too and this will just be one more thing for them to say, 'ok we're done spending 60 bucks per game on this thing. We'll buy you some itunes points instead'
Sony can do what they want, no big publisher is in the position to ignore them because they depend on them. PS is roughly 50% of the console market, most publisher would be dead in the water without PS sales.
The death of the games industry right before us.Because it's only favors the Haves. The pool of money being spent is finite. And if gamers can't recycle games, they'll buy less. And choose surer things. This benefits the AAAA titles. The CoD, Maddens, and Battlefields will get even more sales now. Everyone who's not a slam duck, will see their sales shrink. It's not that difficult to see why some wouldn't be all that thrilled at a redistribution that's going to favor the rich IPs even more.
I think his comments are a bit overblown. He was referring to the fact that there will be some third party exclusives again at the beginning of next gen (Ryse, Titan, etc)
Pubs need both consoles to survive and stuff like timed exclusive DLC don't sway people's decisions much.
This is far too rational. Obviously EA has gone exclusive...Publishers won't be 'picking sides'. Franchises will be co-marketed in exchange for exclusive content, but it won't even fall straight down publisher lines, for example we already have Activision associating CoD with XB1 and Destiny with PS4. Ubisoft are on both, as are EA.
No money if no one buys the system because of internet requirements though. Particularly, families with multiple kids.
If gamers support Xbox One over consoles that don't trample on consumers' rights I'm sick of you all
why ? What is the difference with multiple kids. A family would have to buy multiple copies of a game on the ps4 or xbox one to play the same game at the same time.
Anyone willing to give up their rights as a customer to play a goddamn video game is a silly individualThis is such a funny stance, why should gamers who want to play Halo ect, not do so because you don't agree with MS's antics?
I'm pretty sure that someone is getting rights to my first born through a EULA. But who has time to read those things?Anyone willing to give up their rights as a customer to play a goddamn video game is a silly individual
Anyone willing to give up their rights as a customer to play a goddamn video game is a silly individual
It's in Polish. I asked if there's any problem with Xbox One, and they said that the production is going fine. So yeah, it's not 100% confirmation and everything, but I'll take it.
Just an e-mail to the PR lady.
Not if PS4 gets an early install base lead.
I don't think any publisher (save for EA, who are stupid) will risk half their install base for the possibility of reduced piracy/used game sales. Especially when used game sales are put back into new game purchases.
EA at most is going to watch early console sales and adjust their partnerships accordingly.
Is the One's announcement of used games and always online/24hr check in festure what he meant when he made these comments on the bonus round?
Based on what we know, Sony doesn't have a mandatory 24hr check in system, they also won't allegedly be blocking used games, but will instead leave it up to publishers.
What if the some developers/publishers aren't too happy about the pretty draconian methods being implemented to curb used games and have decided to forego the One as a platform altogether?
CDPR, for example, refuse to acknowledge if there's a One version in the works. Many, including myself initially thought that it would be a timed exclusive and show up at the MS presser, but it apparently won't be shown in public at all this year (BHC), so where does that leave the One version?
CDPR aren't the only ones, many smaller developers are simply foregoing the One due to its approach to self publishing, not receiving dev kits and simply not being happy with the direction MS are going..
Anyway, to get to my point...is what we are seeing now what Gertsmann meant when said third parties would be picking a side?
http://www.thecoversystem.com/2013/04/rumor-third-party-exclusives-making.html
lot of silly pc gamers out there
Anyone willing to give up their rights as a customer to play a goddamn video game is a silly individual