• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Jim Sterling Goes Independent

I've often wondered what profound ignorance looks like, yet...

Yeah. There it is.

So because TotalBiscuit gets paid by promotional companies to promote their shit, the comprison between what Jim does and what he does is... less valid?

I need a fucking diagram for that logic train, my friend. That makes no sense whatsoever.

Basically you're saying "Well, because Jim's asking for a tenth of what TotalBiscuit earns, it sounds like a lot because numbers larger than four confuse me and stop TALKING! I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE DATE! WHY ARE THERE TWO DIGITS!"

So yeah. That's you in this comparison.

Sigh.

You mentioned that TotalBiscuit gets paid far in excess of the milestone that Jim was proposing for direct crowdfunding. I said that wasn't a fair comparison as they're completely different revenue streams, which you then confirmed by saying that a lot of TotalBiscuit's content is paid for by publishers. There's your logic.

TotalBiscuit isn't asking for money directly from his audience, his content generates that revenue. People pay him to reach his audience, his audience are not paying him. A more apt comparison for what Jim Sterling is proposing would be how much other writers on Patreon are receiving to produce similar work, not one of the most popular gaming channels on YouTube.
 
Does it matter?

Before taxes, $72,000/year isn't much to ask from a totally independent content creator.
If he still lives in Mississippi, it's a king's ransom.

Not that there's anything wrong with that. Sterling is pretty prolific and has a rabid fanbase. I'm sure he'll land right-side up.
 
Ikr?

And ugh please nobody mention MovieBob's name. I've been trying to forget about that guy for the past couple of years now.

You know how there are people here that hate or are disgusted with TB? It's pretty much how I feel about MovieBob. The guy is just a disgusting human being to me. Even as bad as DSP. AND THAT'S saying something. XD

Shamus Young still writes for Escapist although his comics are done a while ago. Critical intel column had a couple of interesting articles as well. Also, I like most of Miracle of Sound songs but that depends on a more personal preference.
 
Side note - do people still listen to actual audio podcasts?
Yup. when doing housework, in the car and when grinding or doing other tasks in games where I don't need or like the sound. I mostly listen to swedish ones since I haven't found any others I "click" with, but there is nothing wrong with the medium.
 
I've recognize his name, but I've never seen him or heard him. So far, so good.

your salary is up to the scrutiny of your employer.
shocking that when the public is asked for money they offer public scrutiny in return...

Except that only people who contribute are his "employers". (patrons, more accurately) That doesn't fit this situation at all unless you're suggesting that naysayers such as yourself are subscribing. Stranger things have happened, I guess. People buy consoles just so they can say "I own both." when they troll, for example.
 
But you pick and choose the distance and requirements for change in every situation too. Some things take more, some things take less. Some things people find unforgivable. Some people will need more than you. Some will need less. Telling someone that they should recognize the change because they've met your internal standard doesn't make it a universal standard.

I should note that I have no grudge with Jim Sterling in any way.

The only thing I'm telling people is that they need to accept change. Not that they need to accept my line for when that change is acceptable enough. That's independent.

If people really want to say "this is unforgivable" that someone once made a ridiculous misogynistic comment when they were younger and more stupid even when all evidence suggests a person has changed in the interim years, again, I'd say that reflects on the person refusing to forgive far worse than the comment itself would make Jim look.

But they are absolutely entitled to that. What someone should do and what someone will do are two distinct discussions. They absolutely should forgive, because forgiveness is liberating and it doesn't just benefit the individual being forgiven. It's a refractive process that allows people to recognize that they too are capable of being forgiven for their worst mistakes. EVERYONE on Earth who has ever lived has made bad mistakes that if taken in context would be worth anger and consternation, but when taken in the fullness of the prism of their life is relatively irrelevant and worthy of forgiveness.

There's this real silly urge in the gaming community - often because some in the community want to try to find "dirt" of people they disagree with in order to discredit their opinions - to try to paint someone as always this way or that based on ancient comments. As I said, Evilore has been being smeared by this shit too. He made some awkward comments in the past, and now people want to hold him to that shit forever.

I can't tell you the number of people in this industry who are being painted into a corner due to ancient mistakes. It's just dead end behavior. Do we want people to change for the better? Yes. Should we encourage that sort of change? Yes. So whether or not you personally want to forever harbor a grudge is your own prerogative, but it's super counterproductive. If someone is really changing and there has been years between now and the mistake, ya'll need to let that shit go.

Yep. It's much easier to ignore valid criticism from someone by holding past sins over their head, than trying to argue the substance of their current position.

Jim takes some pretty hard to dispute stances on hot button issues... and his attitude just further enrages the people who know they can't debate the substance of his opinion.

That's not to say he can't be debated. I don't agree with everything he says, but it's certainly more effort to make a well formed rebuke to one of Jim's measured positions than it is to point out hateful stuff he said in the past.

And it's worth noting the extremes of this position: Even if someone has made terrible mistakes in the past, it doesn't actually say anything one way or the other about the merits of their argument. That's why people should focus on the arguments being made rather than the person. You don't have to forgive a person to address points raised. The second you start going off on a tangent about someone's personal behavior (unless that personal behavior is immediately relevant) to avoid actually discussing the substance of someone's point is the second that person is losing the argument.

And I agree completely. Jim is strong willed and opinionated and people should absolutely debate him on the points. But the obnoxious and shitty misogynistic behavior he participated in years ago - as well as people like Evilore, people like me, and most people in general who have ever made unfortunate mistakes - is worth leaving off the table if the change is apparent and if enough time has passed. Jim is clearly not the person he once was. And we're all benefiting from the better Jim :)
 
Exactly, where is the line drawn?

Between people who crystalize statements and people who understand other people can grow.

I was a shitty human being a decade ago, one I would not have liked to associate with. I'd be offended if someone judged me now on my behavior back then.
 
And it's worth noting the extremes of this position: Even if someone has made terrible mistakes in the past, it doesn't actually say anything one way or the other about the merits of their argument. That's why people should focus on the arguments being made rather than the person. You don't have to forgive a person to address points raised. The second you start going off on a tangent about someone's personal behavior (unless that personal behavior is immediately relevant) to avoid actually discussing the substance of someone's point is the second that person is losing the argument.

And I agree completely. Jim is strong willed and opinionated and people should absolutely debate him on the points. But the obnoxious and shitty misogynistic behavior he participated in years ago - as well as people like Evilore, people like me, and most people in general who have ever made unfortunate mistakes - is worth leaving off the table, because the change is apparent. Jim is clearly not the person he once was. And we're all benefiting from the better Jim :)
Honestly, you've blossomed into one of my favorite people of late. When I see you chip in on the kind of issues I care about, I find you both more accepting of true debate and much more reasoned in your posts.

I don't want to sound like your dad, or anything, but you've grown a lot. Seeing people change for the better... when I'm regularly playing the roll of 'blunt object' trying to nudge a bigot far enough out of line that the ban hammer comes down... it's really refreshing.

I don't think I'm going to stop playing the blunt object, but you and Jim and other people who have become more progressive remind me that sometimes you really can just reason with people to help guide them in more positive directions.
 
The only thing I'm telling people is that they need to accept change. Not that they need to accept my line for when that change is acceptable enough. That's independent.

If people really want to say "this is unforgivable" that someone once made a ridiculous misogynistic comment when they were younger and more stupid even when all evidence suggests a person has changed in the interim years, again, I'd say that reflects on the person refusing to forgive far worse than the comment itself would make Jim look.

But they are absolutely entitled to that. What someone should do and what someone will do are two distinct discussions. They absolutely should forgive, because forgiveness is liberating and it doesn't just benefit the individual being forgiven. It's a refractive process that allows people to recognize that they too are capable of being forgiven for their worst mistakes. EVERYONE on Earth who has ever lived has made bad mistakes that if taken in context would be worth anger and consternation, but when taken in the fullness of the prism of their life is relatively irrelevant and worthy of forgiveness.

Not everyone is worthy of forgiveness, not to say Jim isn't worthy. Also maybe some people are calling out Jim because his actions may seem hypocritical to them.
 
No one has ever bought both consoles just to troll. That is so ridiculous I had to reply.

Do many people buy both just to troll? Probably not.

Do some people buy both and feel enough ambivalence towards one and favoritism toward the other to post fanboy-ish things anyway? I'd say that happens a bit more. Still not super common, mind you, but it's not that hard to find.
 
There's this real silly urge in the gaming community - often because some in the community want to try to find "dirt" of people they disagree with in order to discredit their opinions - to try to paint someone as always this way or that based on ancient comments. As I said, Evilore has been being smeared by this shit too. He made some awkward comments in the past, and now people want to hold him to that shit forever.

It's interesting you bring this up, because it's key to the point: When someone in some level of power brings the hammer down on others, remarking how they are filth or human garbage or whatever, removing their ability to participate or show some sort of change in the future, it has a habit of coming back around. Like you said, pretty much anyone can dredge something up from the past and throw it back in one's face...which is why I think people shouldn't be so hasty to be excessively harsh to mistakes in the first place.

For instance, if Jim Sterling was to make the same faux pas with Anna Anthropy or whomever would be the 2015 cultural equivalent in the current climate, he would basically be excommunicated from the gaming press. No Patreon, no ad support, no sponsorships or major outlets looking to bring him on. And nothing in the future would change that because there would be no exposure to his changed viewpoint. That's just the way things work.

If GAF, and by extension Evilore's forum-tone-setting views, existed now as the state they were in 5 years ago, this place likely would be branded the same as Reddit gaming. And to the pits of hell forever would it be cast.
 
Jim Fucking Sterling, the man who spent honest money on fucking GRASS SIMULATOR so you didn't have to?

So... Jim Sterling is some sort equivalent of Jesus within the gaming community?

Jesus died for my sins... and then Jim Sterling came along with the best intentions and spent his own hard earn money on what was certainly the next Spelunky or Rogue Legacy... and much to our surprise, this wasn't anywhere near the level of quality we were expecting as we rushed to our favorite retailers to secure our pre-orders.

Praise Jesus and praise Jim Fucking Sterling, son.
 
Sigh.

You mentioned that TotalBiscuit gets paid far in excess of the milestone that Jim was proposing for direct crowdfunding. I said that wasn't a fair comparison as they're completely different revenue streams, which you then confirmed by saying that a lot of TotalBiscuit's content is paid for by publishers. There's your logic.

TotalBiscuit isn't asking for money directly from his audience, his content generates that revenue. People pay him to reach his audience, his audience are not paying him. A more apt comparison for what Jim Sterling is proposing would be how much other writers on Patreon are receiving to produce similar work, not one of the most popular gaming channels on YouTube.

You're misunderstanding product and placement, friend.

The amount of effort Jim and Totalbiscuit put into producing a video is roughly the same, depending on how finicky they are about rough cuts and the like.

Basically you've said "Totalbiscuit is worth more!"

But he's not.

His audience is worth more.

The effort in, product out is different.

Pretending Jim should work ten times as hard to produce a video which requires the same effort to produce as Totalbiscuit produces is a fallacy.

You're the one who made a judgement about the value of the content, not I.

You've stated the amount asked for is excessive.

Back it up with something aside from "No, you're wrong because reasons."
 
Woah, this is great news. Best of luck to you Jim!
 
Not everyone is worthy of forgiveness, not to say Jim isn't worthy. Also maybe some people are calling out Jim because his actions may seem hypocritical to them.

When you stop being a dick bag and start standing up for the people you were previously mean to, that doesn't make you a hypocrite.
 
You're misunderstanding product and placement, friend.

The amount of effort Jim and Totalbiscuit put into producing a video is roughly the same, depending on how finicky they are about rough cuts and the like.

Basically you've said "Totalbiscuit is worth more!"

But he's not.

the marketplace clearly disagrees with this statement...
 
Honestly, you've blossomed into one of my favorite people of late. When I see you chip in on the kind of issues I care about, I find you both more accepting of true debate and much more reasoned in your posts.

I don't want to sound like your dad, or anything, but you've grown a lot. Seeing people change for the better... when I'm regularly playing the roll of 'blunt object' trying to nudge a bigot far enough out of line that the ban hammer comes down... it's really refreshing.

I don't think I'm going to stop playing the blunt object, but you and Jim and other people who have become more progressive remind me that sometimes you really can just reason with people to help guide them in more positive directions.

That's really sweet and encouraging. I try not to shy away from the truth of my actions. I made a lot of mistakes. I fucked up. I was wrong. Everything that happened to me - from the severe backlash from people who used to respect me to the negative comments plastered in every neoGAF youtube link to the demodding - was absolutely deserved based on those mistakes. I am deeply sorry for the shit I've done, and have to accept that it is everyone's right to forgive or not forgive for as long as they like. I have no control over that nor should I. I try to tell myself that it was partly my severe drug addiction caused by what happened to me when I was 18, partly my extreme anxiety and depression I was fighting and therefore self-medicating. But the reality is I made bad choices. And those bad choices don't stop being bad because there were other factors to consider. I can't expect everyone to analyze the complexity of my actions. At the end of the day, those actions were still wrong.

So all I can ask for me - and for anyone else who has ever made a mistake that is immortalized in online form - is for the chance to show people I have changed. All I can request is that people maybe stop and look at the big picture and compare past and current behavior. Maybe they'll see I have made an effort, or maybe they will say I haven't. I have to accept it either way. But doing these sorts of things with the motivation that forgiveness is possible makes all the difference.

Everyone has a different line for when forgiveness is warranted. I just think perspective is necessary. Most people made mistakes on a forum and were often young and foolish when doing so. People grow up. I've been on neoGAF for a decade (20yro-30yro), and I've been completely clean for two of them. Evilore is also turning 30. I don't know how old Jim Sterling is, but I'm sure he's spent aeons online and has come around a lot since he was younger.

I've been following your posts in GG, and they're usually huge and well informed and passionate. I mean, you're alive and you're trying to make a difference. And whether you make mistakes in that process or not, I'd hope people would hold out forgiveness in their heart when that time comes as well. Because there's nothing more human than to err.

Not everyone is worthy of forgiveness, not to say Jim isn't worthy. Also maybe some people are calling out Jim because his actions may seem hypocritical to them.

You have to do some real bad shit to not be worthy of forgiveness. We're not talking about rapists or pedophiles or murderers or something. We're talking about people who, when younger, made unfortunate comments on forums or twitter. That's what I mean when talking about perspective. If you think someone is not willing of forgiveness because they made a few mistakes on forums or twitter, then to me that just says more about the stubborn person in question that the person who made a mistake. It's quite immature to never move on for shit like that when change is apparent.

Yes, if someone has a certain behavior and that behavior is really offensive, it's absolutely natural to be skeptical about future behavior. But if that person demonstrates they changed in the interim, if that person showcases real movement toward a different standard... that they've apologized for their past actions, that they've made moves to correct mistakes, that they've synced up with a more progressive approach to life... why would we keep holding this shit over their head?

They just made mistakes. You've made mistakes. Everyone has. And it means we all can come to a point where we change, if we try hard enough. it's a good thing. I wouldn't want a world where no one makes mistakes. I do want a world where people are willing to forgive for those mistake, if it is appropriate.

Teeth said:
It's interesting you bring this up, because it's key to the point: When someone in some level of power brings the hammer down on others, remarking how they are filth or human garbage or whatever, removing their ability to participate or show some sort of change in the future, it has a habit of coming back around. Like you said, pretty much anyone can dredge something up from the past and throw it back in one's face...which is why I think people shouldn't be so hasty to be excessively harsh to mistakes in the first place.

And they often face the consequences of their action, as you outlined in the post. Those consequences are the direct result of the mistakes, and it's part of any atonement that comes for people to truly be forgiven. Just because you're in a position of power does not suddenly make you less worthy of forgiveness or less able to be young and immature. People make mistakes. It's just human nature. The only thing that matters is if they recognize when those mistakes are made, try to distance themselves from that behavior and make persistent moves to stay changed.

Jim Sterling has made such moves, so has Evilore. I can't comment on myself, I just know I've been trying. And there's a billion fellow GAFers and people I can also point to that have made mistakes, and have come around and demonstrated they have changed. And I forgive each and everyone of them, just as I hope people can forgive me.
 
Depends entirely on if you end up on the right side of history or not.

Not at all. You're only a hypocrite if your current actions contradict what you state your current positions to be.

Jims current opinions and current actions line up.

Changing your position or opinion doesn't make you a hypocrite, whether you go from something seen as good to something seen as bad, or vice versa.
 
I would love to comment on how slanted the way you quoted me makes you look, but... Holy shit...

How do you even stand upright?

the rest of your post does nothing to detract from the fact that the marketplace has spoken in terms of totalbiscuit's "worth."

please enlighten me as to how the rest of what you said invalidates the fact that the marketplace has deemed totalbiscuit to be of more worth than other people on youtube?

any endorsements/paid advertising/etc. is given to him because of his audience... the marketplace of viewership.

How do you rest after these sorts of mental gymnastics?
 
the rest of your post does nothing to detract from the fact that the marketplace has spoken in terms of totalbiscuit's "worth."

please enlighten me as to how the rest of what you said invalidates the fact that the marketplace has deemed totalbiscuit to be of more worth than other people on youtube?

any endorsements/paid advertising/etc. is given to him because of his audience... the marketplace of viewership.

How do you rest after these sorts of mental gymnastics?

How is any of this relevant to the Jim situation? How is whatever amount of money Jim raises through Patreon any less of a market valuation?
 
Not at all. You're only a hypocrite if your current actions contradict what you state your current positions to be.

Jims current opinions and current actions line up.

Changing your position or opinion doesn't make you a hypocrite, whether you go from something seen as good to something seen as bad, or vice versa.

Well, we could have a really awesome semantics debate about the true definition of the word hypocrite vs. the way it's commonly used in modern vernacular or you could just forgive all of these uneducated plebes.

EDIT: people use the word "hypocrite" because they feel similarly betrayed by someone spouting things passionately then, to an outside observer, changing their tune with little fanfare. As in, "how am I supposed to believe what you say now when you may change your mind again?" People want infallible leaders. When I said that it depends on whether you're on the right side of history, I was being charitable; it's actually whether you agree with the person's opinions at their present state. If they changed from what you were against to what you believe, they are learning, if they change from what you believe to what you are against, they are a hypocrite.
 
Well, we could have a really awesome semantics debate about the true definition of the word hypocrite vs. the way it's commonly used in modern vernacular or you could just forgive all of these uneducated plebes.

:/

plagiarizes point is correct. Words have meanings. Hypocrisy only applies in the situation he said.
 
Thank god for Jim.

I'll be sure to throw in my support once my funds come back together after my trip next week. Looks like it is doing excellently so far though.
 
I've never used Patreon before. When you commit, it just deducts the dollar value from your card once a month?

So say I committed $5 to Jim, every month it'd deduct 5 from my card?
 
I've never used Patreon before. When you commit, it just deducts the dollar value from your card once a month?

So say I committed $5 to Jim, every month it'd deduct 5 from my card?

Yup, exactly. You'll get an email notification when the exact transaction is processed each month as well. And you can cancel your pledge at any time
 
I've never used Patreon before. When you commit, it just deducts the dollar value from your card once a month?

So say I committed $5 to Jim, every month it'd deduct 5 from my card?

That's my understanding of it. I think it's the first of the month?
 
Well, we could have a really awesome semantics debate about the true definition of the word hypocrite vs. the way it's commonly used in modern vernacular or you could just forgive all of these uneducated plebes.

I'm happy to use any definition of the word people like.

Seeing people say things like 'but how do we KNOW that he really means all the well thought out things he says in support of minorities and the womens when once he used to say super mean things about the transgendered folk?' just makes my eyeballs hurt from rolling too hard.

It's cool, as Amir0x says, if you don't think he's done enough to be forgiven for his past transgressions yet. That's by the by... but if you think changing your opinion from one that I think we can all agree was at best ignorant and at worst small minded to a more open and accepting one is the sort of thing we should insult and discourage... then yeah, I'm going to come away from that thinking that what you're really upset about is that he doesn't hate the minorities any more.

Which I'm probably not going to be too flattering about.

And just for the record, when I say 'you' I don't mean you specifically, but the hypothetical you that might say something like that.

And... mind blowing time... it doesn't matter if he really has changed internally. He could be a ball of bitter hate... it doesn't change that he's making really well thought out and convincing arguments decrying misogyny or publisher influence on the press or whatever.

His arguments are substantive and they hold water. Him not believing them himself wouldn't change that. Again, it would just be a dodge people could use to not actually think through and address his well thought out points.
 
You're misunderstanding product and placement, friend.

The amount of effort Jim and Totalbiscuit put into producing a video is roughly the same, depending on how finicky they are about rough cuts and the like.

Basically you've said "Totalbiscuit is worth more!"

No, I didn't. You drew the comparison between TotalBiscuit and Jim. I said that it was not a fair comparison as their revenue streams for similar content are completely different, regardless of how frequently that content is produced.

Pretending Jim should work ten times as hard to produce a video which requires the same effort to produce as Totalbiscuit produces is a fallacy.

I didn't say this at all, nor do I think that he should.

You're the one who made a judgement about the value of the content, not I.

You've stated the amount asked for is excessive.

$6000 a month to produce that sort of content does seem excessive in comparison with other Patreon users that produce very similar content. Matt Lees, for example, produces videos and a successful podcast for just over half the amount that Jim's milestone was. It is a more appropriate comparison than TotalBiscuit, because both writers are using the same service for funding and producing content in the same mediums.
 
I'm happy to use any definition of the word people like.

Seeing people say things like 'but how do we KNOW that he really means all the well thought out things he says in support of minorities and the womens when once he used to say super mean things about the transgendered folk?' just makes my eyeballs hurt from rolling too hard.

It's cool, as Amir0x says, if you don't think he's done enough to be forgiven for his past transgressions yet. That's by the by... but if you think changing your opinion from one that I think we can all agree was at best ignorant and at worst small minded to a more open and accepting one is the sort of thing we should insult and discourage... then yeah, I'm going to come away from that thinking that what you're really upset about is that he doesn't hate the minorities any more.

Which I'm probably not going to be too flattering about.

And just for the record, when I say 'you' I don't mean you specifically, but the hypothetical you that might say something like that.

Unfortunately, hypocrite has two definitions; from Mirriam Webster:
1
: a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2
: a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings

The one people are usually (and in your opinion, erroneously) using is the former. Since they don't follow Jim Sterling around all fucking day to know his opinions on everything at any given moment, they remember the time that he said bad words about some group and then they hear him condemning people for saying similarly bad words to a different group of people. The feel that he is/may be putting on a false appearance of virtue. He didn't advertise the bad words in the first instance, they just happened to be on the internet: he was 'caught' away from a formally presented persona. The second instance was offered as direct presentation. So people think they are seeing "the real him" in catching him in personal communication. They don't know that he has changed. They may not care. Regardless, they would call him a hypocrite. There is a nature of timeliness that may be a requirement for hypocrisy, but that line is drawn by each individual.
 
That...I don't believe you can, although to be fair I've never looked. Just double checked my emails and it does look like its 1st of the month

Hmmm. Alright, I'll just offset the payment on the card I don't really use that has a bit of a savings on it.

Teeth said:
The one people are usually (and in your opinion, erroneously) using is the former. Since they don't follow Jim Sterling around all fucking day to know his opinions on everything at any given moment, they remember the time that he said bad words about some group and then they hear him condemning people for saying similarly bad words to a different group of people. The feel that he is/may be putting on a false appearance of virtue. He didn't advertise the bad words in the first instance, they just happened to be on the internet: he was 'caught' away from a formally presented persona. The second instance was offered as direct presentation. So people think they are seeing "the real him" in catching him in personal communication. They don't know that he has changed. They may not care. Regardless, they would call him a hypocrite. There is a nature of timeliness that may be a requirement for hypocrisy, but that line is drawn by each individual.

It's quite revealing that it doesn't seem you immediately grasp the implications of what you're saying. Basically you're saying people get to use the word hypocrite incorrectly because they choose to remain ignorant on someone's behavior. If you're going to make all encompassing statements as to the nature of a person for ancient mistakes, people need to exercise a certain level of responsibility in ensuring they're not just besmirching someone's reputation for no good reason.

Your entire point here is essentially

1. People choose to remain ignorant because they once heard the person make a mistake
2. People refuse to actually do any research as to whether their view is valid anymore
3. These people misuse the word hypocrite because of that ignorance

All this just paints the unforgiving people as immature prats, once again lol
 
I can't speak to how much most journalists make in a month, but I do know they don't have to host and maintain a website

Yes because he will need more then anything sites like 1and1 can provide for $50 or less a month. Even paying a web designer wouldn't require him making 6K a month.

Personally, I never found him entertaining. I found is act to be kinda annoying, I didn't mind his written stuff though.
 
Shamus Young still writes for Escapist although his comics are done a while ago. Critical intel column had a couple of interesting articles as well. Also, I like most of Miracle of Sound songs but that depends on a more personal preference.

Ohh miracle of sound I remember them. They are good people. :D

I even love some of their short stuff like what they did for Resident Evil 6.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=7LrVou1Jo7w

But the video below is by far my favorite.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=HiRDJLcYua0
 
Unfortunately, hypocrite has two definitions; from Mirriam Webster:
1
: a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2
: a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings

The one people are usually (and in your opinion, erroneously) using is the former. Since they don't follow Jim Sterling around all fucking day to know his opinions on everything at any given moment, they remember the time that he said bad words about some group and then they hear him condemning people for saying similarly bad words to a different group of people. The feel that he is/may be putting on a false appearance of virtue. He didn't advertise the bad words in the first instance, they just happened to be on the internet: he was 'caught' away from a formally presented persona. The second instance was offered as direct presentation. So people think they are seeing "the real him" in catching him in personal communication. They don't know that he has changed. They may not care. Regardless, they would call him a hypocrite. There is a nature of timeliness that may be a requirement for hypocrisy, but that line is drawn by each individual.

Exactly, when he said his things, it was obviously OK, but now it isn't. In reality, it was never OK to say it. If I was Jim, I'd take a neutral conciliatory stance knowing my past mistakes instead.

He just rants in the same manner I've seen on NeoGaf and it has been done better by Amir0x himself. Amir0x, do you have a charity I can donate to?
 
Top Bottom