What a shocker, guy who hasn't made a decent film in almost two decades continues to make garbage. Hope Disney fires him from Aladdin.
And before you bring up the Sherlock Holmes films, don't. The ONLY reason those films worked was because of RDJ. Anyone else in the role and they'd be crap.
Why is Hollywood so bad at fantasy movies? Outside Jackson Lord of the Rings, I'm having trouble thinking of any good live-action fantasy films, and the more like "traditional" high fantasy they are, the worse they are.
It's been 14 years since Return of the King and nearly a decade since Marvel figured out how to churn out superhero movies (of all things) like a machine while still ensuring that even the worst of them is at least decent. But fantasy movies are still downright terrible 90% of the time.
It can't be that hard, can it? I mean, fantasy is super popular in other mediums. Clearly there's something there that speaks to people. Why can't they unlock the formula?
Its because for some asinine reason, Hollywood has it in their heads that audiences don't want conventional Fantasy films and will only see them if they have some sort of "twist" in them, be it anachronisms (Your Highness, this garbage) or deconstruct the genre to show what "really" happens (Game of Thrones, the god-awful 2004 King Arthur film).
This despite the fact the thus far, the regular fantasy films like LorR and Harry Potter have been by far the most successful, while of the ones that play with the genre, only Game of Thrones has been a hit (and that one plays straight just as many Fantasy tropes as it deconstructs). The rest have been shit, yet Hollywood keeps trying to "Spice Up" fantasy films instead of just, you know, making a good fantasy film.
True. This thread being full of adulation for the hack is surprising.
I mean, Lock, Stock and Snatch were REALLY good.
But yeah, they were flukes...