• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Lost Leonardo Da Vinci painting worth $150 million may have been found

Status
Not open for further replies.
A lost painting by Leonardo da Vinci may have been found in a Scottish farmhouse, reported The Daily Mail. The work, thought to be a 500-year-old portait of Madonna and child, is potentially worth over $150 million (£100 million) if experts are able to prove its authenticity.

The lucky owners of the painting are members of the McLaren family, who acquired the possible da Vinci when it was given to them as a gift in the 1960s. Originally bestowed upon George McLaren, it was later handed down to his wife and eventually his daughter, Fiona. But it wasn't until Fiona and her mother were faced with financial difficulties that they decided to look into the painting's value.

It was first brought to auctioneer Harry Robertson, an expert at Sotheby's who assessed the work as a possible da Vinci. "I showed it to [Mr Robertson] and he was staggered, speechless save for a sigh of exclamation," she said, according to People (UK). The painting has since been viewed by a number of other specialists who have reiterated Robertson's sentiments, such as former Antiques Roadshow presenter Sebastian Times, an ex-director at Christie's in Scotland. Other experts, like Professor Carlo Pedretti of the University of California, believe that the painting is at the very least a work of the da Vinci school, possible created by one of his pupils.

There are a number of telltale signs in the McLaren family heirloom that point to da Vinci. For example, aspects of the figures' hairlines, shoulders and toes bare significant resemblance to other da Vinci characters and a fleur-de-lys hidden within the portrait is another typical detail oh his work. More concretely, experts have noted that the woman in the portrait is an exact match of a traced figure in the "Last Supper," which also bares resemblance to "Madonna of the Rocks." The work is also accompanied by a papal bull, an order from the pope that is attached to the back of the painting. It has been confirmed as belonging to Pope Paul V -- the head of the Catholic Church in the early 17th century.

Fiona has also conducted research, which she chronicled in a book titled "Da Vinci's Last Commission," and has made some assessments of her own. She thinks that the portrait is a depiction of Mary Magdalene and her son, not the Virgin and Jesus. She points to the fact that the woman is dressed in red and not the Virgin's signature blue, and notes in the text that the word "Magdalene" can be read on the papal bull. She believes that the da Vinci work would have been perceived as heretical at the time and so the painting's true meaning was concealed.

The painting's authenticity has yet to be solidified, but experts at the Hamilton Kerr Institute at the University of Cambridge plan on conclusively dating the work by next year. With Da Vinci paintings generally fetching around £100 million, Fiona has on her website that she wants to give a portion of the hopeful sale to the Caterina Peace Foundation.


o-LOST-DA-VINCI-570.jpg


Link

Why can't I ever get gifts like this? :(
 

shira

Member
If some Houdini wants to snatch a couple of swirls of paint that are really only important to some very silly rich people, I don’t really give a damn.
 

Valhelm

contribute something
That looks quite rough for a Leonardo painting. Do they think it was made very early or very late in his career? At his prime his work was much more lifelike.
 

Slayer-33

Liverpool-2
The work is also accompanied by a papal bull, an order from the pope that is attached to the back of the painting. It has been confirmed as belonging to Pope Paul V -- the head of the Catholic Church in the early 17th century.

Dat history

Dat $$$$
 

mandiller

Member
That's amazing! Imagine getting that as a gift.

When my grandfather was young he met Picasso and bought one of his vases from him. He only bought it out of politeness and gave it away to a friend because he didn't like it very much....

Hindsight is great.
 

Homeboyd

Member
I'm convinced if I paint a bunch of crap, slap a $20,000 price tag on it, I could convince people it was super special art and if they didn't agree.... Well, then they just don't get it and aren't sophisticated enough to understand!

Dolla Dolla bills y'all.

...

There's something wrong with me : /
 
I'm convinced if I paint a bunch of crap, slap a $20,000 price tag on it, I could convince people it was super special art and if they didn't agree.... Well, then they just don't get it and aren't sophisticated enough to understand!

Dolla Dolla bills y'all.

...

There's something wrong with me : /

Art value isn't decided by public metrics--it's measured by an elite group of art snobs who have tastes varying between educated historians to people who are too wealthy for their own good.
 

Homeboyd

Member
Art value isn't decided by public metrics--it's measured by an elite group of art snobs who have tastes varying between educated historians to people who are too wealthy for their own good.
Art is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. If I can convince my clueless neighbor to buy my $20,000 piece of crap painting, it's worth $20,000.

I was just talking out of my ass though. I just wanted pop in an say hello to you fine ladies and gents.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom