• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Mass Effect: Andromeda PC system requirements

Worth playing this on PC on 1440p (i can run it) or ps4 pro in 4k? After seeing how horizon looks on the pro, im kinda tempted to get this for the pro...
 
Worth playing this on PC on 1440p (i can run it) or ps4 pro in 4k? After seeing how horizon looks on the pro, im kinda tempted to get this for the pro...
It sounds like your PC is good enough to curb stomp a PS4 Pro. The PS4 Pro doesn't exactly have secret sauce. The better visual experience for you is probably on PC. Unless the couch and big TV are important for you and you're not set up to PC game in that manner.
 
Worth playing this on PC on 1440p (i can run it) or ps4 pro in 4k? After seeing how horizon looks on the pro, im kinda tempted to get this for the pro...

Better graphical quality settings / level of effects vs. checkerboard 4k

Something only you can answer for yourself.

edit: Apparently Dictator93 has better info on PS4Pro res
 
this might be my opinion only but 1080/60 beats 4k/30, 60 frames gives the image "freedom", don't know how else to put it, i have a PS4PRO for exclusives only but if you have a PC that can run this game go for it.
 
Can't believe they have a 3rd gen Intel as a minimum requirement. My guess is they listed the CPU specs high just to be safe. I'm betting an i7 920 could run this. Maybe not at 60 FPS, but it would run over 30. In any event I'm safe with my Haswell.
 
Can't believe they have a 3rd gen Intel as a minimum requirement. My guess is they listed the CPU specs high just to be safe. I'm betting an i7 920 could run this. Maybe not at 60 FPS, but it would run over 30. In any event I'm safe with my Haswell.
Almost certainly. My 2550k isn't worried either.
 
"NVIDIA & EA have revealed that the massively anticipated Mass Effect game will launch with support for NVIDIA Ansel, High-Dynamic Range (HDR) and gameplay broadcasting to Facebook Live with GeForce Experience."
I am definitely looking forward to seeing HDR on ME:A. Finally HDR decided to work with Shadow Warrior 2 after not initially and it's great. Resi 7 is harder to tell due to the muted colours. But I'm expecting ME:A to be particularly vibrant.
 
Don't know, my 2500K @ 4.5GHz doesn't like Inquisition. I mean it runs mostly well, but it stutters, especially when running around at Skyhold.


Nowhere close to as bad as the PS4 stutters with it, but it was enough that it bothered me while playing.

Same problem here. Witcher 3 stutters as well. Gonna upgrade in summer i think, it's had a good 5 years at least!
 
1440p will likely look better than the scaled 4k.

Yes, I believe 1440p has more pixels than 1800checkerboard


I am definitely looking forward to seeing HDR on ME:A. Finally HDR decided to work with Shadow Warrior 2 after not initially and it's great. Resi 7 is harder to tell due to the muted colours. But I'm expecting ME:A to be particularly vibrant.

Hell yeah, I think it's going to look great!
 
this might be my opinion only but 1080/60 beats 4k/30, 60 frames gives the image "freedom", don't know how else to put it, i have a PS4PRO for exclusives only but if you have a PC that can run this game go for it.

Yeah. For me I will tweak settings to get 1440p/60fps, and that sort of IQ and playability are trumps over getting it for Ps4 Pro. If my friends were all on PS4 then i'd probably go on that for the MP, but I'm not gonna be able to tell the difference between some settings anyway so if I have to lower a few to hit 60 I dm.
 
i could do that, but my tvs pretty far from my pc, and id have to move it unfortunately :(

We have the technology.

76971.jpg
 
With my PC I can play any game 1440p@60fps and usually with highest settings, minus high AA (obviously no 8xMSAA). That said I'll try 4K@30fps just to see (and maybe for pics) and if there is no stutter or judder and the frame timing is good I might even play at 4K. But I'll probably sit at 1440p unless there is an inbuilt scaler like in DA:I where I can go to 4K but knock off 25%. Might give slightly better PQ.
 
Worth playing this on PC on 1440p (i can run it) or ps4 pro in 4k? After seeing how horizon looks on the pro, im kinda tempted to get this for the pro...

if you want to obliterate you pro draw distance (and imagine horizon with it) you will go pc.
It's an open world.
 
Yes, I believe 1440p has more pixels than 1800checkerboard

8.3 million for 4k
4.1 million for faux-k
3.6 million pixels for 1440p.
2.88 million for checkerboard scaled 1800p.
2 million rendered for 1080p

edit: Frankly, if you have a PC that can run this game at 1080p60fps or better, it makes no damn sense to go with the console version IMO
 
Really? Back when I played that I was running stock 2550k (3.5ghz) and had locked 60 (with very rare exceptions) with maybe just a couple things turned down from ultra, with a 970.

I expect that kind of setup will run it on our with the PS4 Pro (E.g. not 60fps without turning some things down).

I'd rather wait for HBM2 and affordable Intel octocores before my full rebuild.

My 2500k bottlenecked my 1080, I got huge gains upgrading my CPU, like 2x the performance on most newish AAA games. Especially open world games I have a hard time believing that the 2500k is not sitting at 100 percent useage in most new games unless it's very heavily overclocked.
 
If people want to take hi res pics there's Ansel or I expect SRWE will work (it does for DAI). That way you can play in whatever resolution you like for the fps, but get those stunning screenshots to look at afterwards.

With SRWE you get the opportunity to change aspect ratio as well, making for even nicer pictures.
 
Will wait for the prices to be a bit more reasonable before biting. With the assumption there will be a lot of dlc and likely priced to high as usual, I might even wait longer still for a goty release or something similar (though EA don't seem to bother with this on PC, in which case Origin Access for a brief period would be more cost effective)
 
No, we do not. HDMI cables are really finicky when over 20+ft to support 4K + HDR.

Isn't that why you get an active cable? Or does HDR currently present a problem?

If you want to get a little creative, I suppose you could use HDBTs and run CAT-6 in-between.
 
Will wait for the prices to be a bit more reasonable before biting. With the assumption there will be a lot of dlc and likely priced to high as usual, I might even wait longer still for a goty release or something similar (though EA don't seem to bother with this on PC, in which case Origin Access for a brief period would be more cost effective)

1032110_LB_231x326_en_GB_%5E_2015-09-15-15-45-25_98b2647e9d55ea3ff1f046a67f9648da93422ce8.jpg
 
Isn't that why you get an active cable?

If you want the full 18Gbps (e.g. 4K/60 4:4:4 or RGB, edit: this is at 10bit or higher) what cables work are very hit and miss. Some of the active cables with redmere work for some people, others that say they do and don't. Hell even HDMI Premium certified (certified to 18Gbps) cables are all over the place. I bought a monoprice HDMI premium certified cable at 20ft and the signal just kept dropping out, their 6ft variant works fine. Some people even have issues with the Celerity fibre optic cables, this is a $300+ cable. Once we start moving to HDMI 2.1 and require up to 48Gbps, who knows what will work.

Check this thread on AVS Forum regarding the issues and cables that do/don't work.

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/168-h...-support-4k-60hz-4-4-4-chroma-deep-color.html

If you want to get a little creative, I suppose you could use HDBTs and run CAT-6 in-between.


This is what I use to get Oculus Rift working in another room, haven't tried it with the projector as I don't think it (the one I have) can handle the full 18Gbps.
 
If you want the full 18Gbps (e.g. 4K/60 4:4:4 or RGB, edit: this is at 10bit or higher) what cables work are very hit and miss. Some of the active cables with redmere work for some people, others that say they do and don't. Hell even HDMI Premium certified (certified to 18Gbps) cables are all over the place. I bought a monoprice HDMI premium certified cable at 20ft and the signal just kept dropping out, their 6ft variant works fine. Some people even have issues with the Celerity fibre optic cables, this is a $300+ cable. Once we start moving to HDMI 2.1 and require up to 48Gbps, who knows what will work.

Check this thread on AVS Forum regarding the issues and cables that do/don't work.

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/168-h...-support-4k-60hz-4-4-4-chroma-deep-color.html

This is what I use to get Oculus Rift working in another room, haven't tried it with the projector as I don't think it (the one I have) can handle the full 18Gbps.

Good information. Thanks.
 
I would say it depends on whether MEA wins GOTY, otherwise there would be no incentive for them to do so.

Err, they dont do these types of things because they care about winning the award.

With Dragon Age it was almost certainly because the game didn't do that well financially so they couldn't rely on their normal strategy.
 
It was one of if not Bioware's biggest game of all time.

Biggest launch.

It still debuted at like number 5 in the UK. It was not in the top 10 of its launch month in the US. That's not the numbers they were looking for. Even if ME: A ends up being their biggest launch soon, it doesn't neccessarily mean it's what EA are wanting at this point.

There's a reason they did not report figures much beyond that period. The DLC and the multiplayer both did not do well.
 
Isn't that why you get an active cable? Or does HDR currently present a problem?

If you want to get a little creative, I suppose you could use HDBTs and run CAT-6 in-between.

Doesn't matter if it's Active or Passive, long distance hdmi cables are too problematic at the moment to push out the full 18Gbps with 4K and HDR. I've tried with my media set up and have gone over a bunch of cables. This is why there are no Premium Certified Cables over 25ft.
 
Biggest launch.

It still debuted at like number 5 in the UK. It was not in the top 10 of its launch month in the US. That's not the numbers they were looking for. Even if ME: A ends up being their biggest launch soon, it doesn't neccessarily mean it's what EA are wanting at this point.

There's a reason they did not report figures much beyond that period. The DLC and the multiplayer both did not do well.

This is tales from your ass essentially made-up though isn't it?

Incidentally:
In particular, Dragon Age: Inquisition had by far the most successful launch in BioWare's history, exceeding our expectations.
 
Biggest launch.

It still debuted at like number 5 in the UK. It was not in the top 10 of its launch month in the US. That's not the numbers they were looking for. Even if ME: A ends up being their biggest launch soon, it doesn't necessarily mean it's what EA are wanting at this point.

There's a reason they did not report figures much beyond that period. The DLC and the multiplayer both did not do well.

We don't know the official numbers but I'm positive it sold well. EA isn't really big on releasing numbers in general so I'm not sure if we can cite that as evidence it didn't sell well.
 
I would say it depends on whether MEA wins GOTY, otherwise there would be no incentive for them to do so.

Every game wins GOTY (from someone or another). That said, "wait for a price drop" works almost universally.

I plan to preorder Andromeda to support the development of similar games.
 
Well I'll be trying this with my 8GB ram and 970 as see how I go at 1080p. Inquisition was fine so I remain optimistic. Hopefully this has render scaling so I can run the UI at 4K at least.
 
Top Bottom