• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Media Create Sales 11/19 - 11/25 2007

ksamedi

Member
Mithos Yggdrasill said:
Preliminary reports say that who is buying Wii Fit already has a Wii. A relative small part is buying Wii Fit AND a Wii.

I really don't think that that report paints an accurate picture. But if 300k WiiFit products were sold, that still would mean close to 30k extra Wii sales above the usual.
 
Mithos Yggdrasill said:
At this point, all reports say that Wii Fit is going to be huge, but I have the impression that Wii's hardware will not skyrocket.

well, Wii is around 4mln, next year it will overpass GC, N64, SS and PCE LTD.
Only NES, SNES, PS1 and PS2 had a bigger userbase.
It's time people start buying the games, consoles are already inside the houses in a good number...
 

ksamedi

Member
Moor-Angol said:
well, Wii is around 4mln, next year it will overpass GC, N64, SS and PCE LTD.
Only NES, SNES, PS1 and PS2 had a bigger userbase.
It's time people start buying the games, consoles are already inside the houses in a good number...

Its also time for third parties to deliver.
 
ksamedi said:
I really don't think that that report paints an accurate picture. But if 300k WiiFit products were sold, that still would mean close to 30k extra Wii sales above the usual.

Never said that these reports are accurate in any way. Just they are additional informations.

ksamedi said:
Its also time for third parties to deliver.

I don't think that this is included into their plans...
 

Lobster

Banned
iidesuyo said:
Why should they care where their sales come from...

They should care because they're still paying for the development, publishing and producing of the game. They should atleast release the Wii game earlier than the Ps2 version. Just imagine how Devil Kings 2 would've done on Wii if it were released as a time exclusive for about a month.

Lets just assume Wii version does 150k in a month when its timed exclusive. The company would have those 150k sales plus the Ps2 versions sales.

But..they released them together and now they'll have good Ps2 sales and shit Wii sales.
 
Lobster said:
They should care because they're still paying for the development, publishing and producing of the game. They should atleast release the Wii game earlier than the Ps2 version. Just imagine how Devil Kings 2 would've done on Wii if it were released as a time exclusive for about a month.

Lets just assume Wii version does 150k in a month when its timed exclusive. The company would have those 150k sales plus the Ps2 versions sales.

But..they released them together and now they'll have good Ps2 sales and shit Wii sales.

The licensing for the PS2 version is probably less, so they probably make more money for each PS2 copy sold over the Wii version.
 

Lobster

Banned
The Innocent X said:
The licensing for the PS2 version is probably less, so they probably make more money for each PS2 copy sold over the Wii version.

They could make extra though. Thats what im trying to say. Third Parties for some reason aren't very smart though :\ Except for Ubisoft. They released Assasins Creed 360 before the Ps3 version. Look at what that resulted in...
 

Mushashi

Member
Moor-Angol said:
well, Wii is around 4mln, next year it will overpass GC, N64, SS and PCE LTD.
Only NES, SNES, PS1 and PS2 had a bigger userbase.
It's time people start buying the games, consoles are already inside the houses in a good number...

Wasn't the SS LTD much higher than 4 million in Japan?
 

iidesuyo

Member
Lobster said:
They should care because they're still paying for the development, publishing and producing of the game. They should atleast release the Wii game earlier than the Ps2 version. Just imagine how Devil Kings 2 would've done on Wii if it were released as a time exclusive for about a month.

Lets just assume Wii version does 150k in a month when its timed exclusive. The company would have those 150k sales plus the Ps2 versions sales.

But..they released them together and now they'll have good Ps2 sales and shit Wii sales.

I don't really get your thoughts... so you think more people will buy the game when the Wii version is exclusive for some time? Because whether it's 150k Wii and 150k PS2, or 250k PS2 and 50k Wii, for the publisher it's the same.
 

Lobster

Banned
iidesuyo said:
I don't really get your thoughts... so you think more people will buy the game when the Wii version is exclusive for some time? Because whether it's 150k Wii and 150k PS2, or 250k PS2 and 50k Wii, for the publisher it's the same.

No see, its clear knowledge that a hell lot of people in Japan have a Ps2. When you have a Wii game and a Ps2 game released on the same day, people don't bother buying the Wii version and a Wii because its on the Ps2 already.
 

iidesuyo

Member
Lobster said:
No see, its clear knowledge that a hell lot of people in Japan have a Ps2. When you have a Wii game and a Ps2 game released on the same day, people don't bother buying the Wii version and a Wii because its on the Ps2 already.

But then again, why should they care at all. It's not their obligation to push a certain hardware, all they need to do is make money. Whether that's on PS2 or Wii, it makes no difference to them. They are probably even happy that PS2 games still sell well, because they know the hardware and its userbase is quite predictable.
 

Lobster

Banned
iidesuyo said:
But then again, why should they care at all. It's not their obligation to push a certain hardware, all they need to do is make money. Whether that's on PS2 or Wii, it makes no difference to them. They are probably even happy that PS2 games still sell well, because they know the hardware and its userbase is quite predictable.

Developers soon have to ditch the Ps2 as much as they don't want to. They should act now by growing a userbase on Wii that likes their games.

If Devil Kings 2 was Wii exclusive, then the Ps2 fans would've jumped ship to Wii along with the new buyers.
 

Anth

Member
Lobster said:
They could make extra though. Thats what im trying to say. Third Parties for some reason aren't very smart though :\ Except for Ubisoft. They released Assasins Creed 360 before the Ps3 version. Look at what that resulted in...
What? Do you really believe Wii owners will buy a game they otherwise wouldn't buy because it is a timed exclusive?

The publisher doesn't care, nor should he care, whether the consumer picks up the Wii copy or the PS2 copy. If they release one version later than the other, then some of the hype will have died down already and sales will decrease overall.

I honestly don't see your point.

If Devil Kings 2 was Wii exclusive, then the Ps2 fans would've jumped ship to Wii along with the new buyers
Okay, that makes some sense. Though I'm not convinced that small games like that make anyone buy a console, and I believe sales dying down due to hype dying down (or alternatively, requiring marketing over a longer period of time) is more important for publishers.
 

Dahbomb

Member
Lobster said:
They should care because they're still paying for the development, publishing and producing of the game. They should atleast release the Wii game earlier than the Ps2 version. Just imagine how Devil Kings 2 would've done on Wii if it were released as a time exclusive for about a month.

Lets just assume Wii version does 150k in a month when its timed exclusive. The company would have those 150k sales plus the Ps2 versions sales.

But..they released them together and now they'll have good Ps2 sales and shit Wii sales.
No it's more like YOU don't want games to be on PS2 at the same time as Wii because it ends up selling worse than Wii. Developers always benefit from releasing on PS2 first or on same date as they will always achieve maximum sales that way. You are assuming that if by having timed exclusive, the game would sell just as well on PS2 if it weren't timed but in fact it would actually sell worse on PS2. Getting out games on both consoles at the same time is always the best strategy. Your idea only benefits the Wii.
 

Lobster

Banned
Dahbomb said:
No it's more like YOU don't want games to be on PS2 at the same time as Wii because it ends up selling worse than Wii. Developers always benefit from releasing on PS2 first or on same date as they will always achieve maximum sales that way. You are assuming that if by having timed exclusive, the game would sell just as well on PS2 if it weren't timed but in fact it would actually sell worse on PS2. Getting out games on both consoles at the same time is always the best strategy.

Err what? The Ps2 version would still have a shitload of sales..If im not mistaken there are 21 million Ps2 owners in Japan. They will more then make the 60k first day sales for the Ps2 version.

What? Do you really believe Wii owners will buy a game they otherwise wouldn't buy because it is a timed exclusive?

The publisher doesn't care, nor should he care, whether the consumer picks up the Wii copy or the PS2 copy. If they release one version later than the other, then some of the hype will have died down already and sales will decrease overall.

I honestly don't see your point.

Well take UT3 for example. The game will definitely benefit from being Ps3 console timed exclusive.

My point is third parties complain about their Nintendo third party sales when they're the one sabotaging their sales by releasing the game on Ps2 aswell.

Lets imagine that SMG was on the Ps2 and Wii. Do you think the Wii version would have sold as well?
 

NeonZ

Member
No it's more like YOU don't want games to be on PS2 at the same time as Wii because it ends up selling worse than Wii.

To be fair, most of those games are sequels of PS2 franchises, and the PS2 versions are hardly any different from the Wii ones, so there's no incentive for the users to migrate to a different platform to play those games. So, naturally, the PS2 version will sell better.

I suppose part of that is Nintendo's own fault though. They should try securing (timed) exclusives to try expanding the demographic of the Wii's user base. The 3rd parties have no real reason to do that by themselves, after all, while the PS2 is still alive.
 

Lobster

Banned
NeonZ said:
To be fair, most of those games are sequels of PS2 franchises, and the PS2 versions are hardly any different from the Wii ones, so there's no incentive for the users to migrate to a different platform to play those games. So, naturally, the PS2 version will sell better.

I suppose part of that is Nintendo's own fault though. They should try securing (timed) exclusives to try expanding the demographic of the Wii's user base. The 3rd parties have no real reason to do that by themselves, after all.

When third parties complain about their sales on Nintendo products it is their fault.
 

Lobster

Banned
Kurosaki Ichigo said:
Sounds like someone didn't like 3rd party charts.

As in someone other than 3rd parties themselves :lol

If you're reffering to me, yes I am pretty dissapointed in the 3rd party charts.

Take a look at the Wii charts everybody.

1. WII Dragon Quest Swords: The Masked Queen and the Tower of Mirrors - 453,445 (20070826)
2. WII Dragon Ball Z Sparking Neo - 157,784 (20070701)
3. WII Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicles - 104,960 (20071118)
4. WII Ennichi no Tatsujin - 104,524 (20070701)
5. WII Naruto: Shippuuden Gekitou Ninja Taisen! EX - 97,123 (20070701)
6. WII One Piece: Unlimited Adventure - 95,203 (20070701)
7. WII Resident Evil 4: Wii Edition - 88,367 (20070701)
8. WII Jikkyou Power Pro Baseball Wii - 72,388 (20070805)
9. WII Bleach: Shattered Blade - 68,728 (20070325)
10. WII Aim!! Fishing Master - 66,278 (20070701)

If anybody didn't noitce, the only games on that list aren't Wii exclusive are RE:WE, Jikkyou and DBZ. Jikkyou sold really horribly..the Ps2 version did like over 150k first week..DBZ sold no where near to its Ps2 counter part.

I seriously blame the Ps2 versions..The Wii version of DBZ and Jikkyou could have sold exactly the same ammount or close to, as the Ps2 versions did if they were exclusive.
 
Dahbomb said:
No it's more like YOU don't want games to be on PS2 at the same time as Wii because it ends up selling worse than Wii. Developers always benefit from releasing on PS2 first or on same date as they will always achieve maximum sales that way. You are assuming that if by having timed exclusive, the game would sell just as well on PS2 if it weren't timed but in fact it would actually sell worse on PS2. Getting out games on both consoles at the same time is always the best strategy. Your idea only benefits the Wii.

Yeah, this is not entirely false. Third Parties simply go where the money is and evidence says that now Wii is profitable most of all for Nintendo and its games. Even some big Nintendo's games seems to find difficulties selling in Japan, so I don't see really why Third Parties should put effort on a console that for now is very casual.
An additional problem is that Nintendo has almost the monopole of the casual genre that succeed. Yes, we saw many imitations, but nothing has been successfull as Wii Sports or (it seems) Wii Fit.
So, a Third Party that has intention to try to enter into the Wii's market, is very unsure about results and the obvious solution is to port the game for PS2 either, where there is always some margin of success.
Otherwise, there is the X360, that for now it is the best choice for Developers thanks to the incredible attach rate in the USA. Japan of course is lost for X360, but there is always the PS3 and that's why Third Parties are making games for both PS3 and X360: the former for Japan. The latter for Occident.

Wii is an outsider. The ironic thing is that it is the leader. A leader that doesn't share well its profits with other developers as PS2 or PSOne did or as X360 os doing right now, because of its audience (worse the a noble-gas electronic configuration...).
If you think about it, nothing has really changed with Wii for a Third Party viewpoint, outside the fact that the system is very successfull for Party- and Casual games. In fact, this is the only point where Wii gained and is still gaining support. But the hardcore audience is even smaller then on Gamecube and this scary Third Parties, because the 95%of AAA games deveoped by them are hardcore's games and don't suit well for Wii.

What can Nintendo do ? Try to expand its hardcore audience. But this is not easy, because gamers are Hi-Tech nerds that don't want an underpowered system. Thanks God, games like Corruption or Galaxy or Smash are here to say that they're wrong and that power is not everything, but they're always Nintendo's games and the majority of gamers want Third party games in order to shift from PS2 to Wii and not to PS3 or X360. And this explain Monster Hunter 3 on Wii. Sure, this is a Nintendo's move to fill this lack of hardcore audience, but it is absolutely not enough.

Anyway, the paradox is that this situation is bad only for gamers, but not for Nintendo that is swimming in the money. And this explain why they aren't really making big moves to change this situation. After all, what they did with Wii is only to prevent an economical crysis, because of the continued decline of the dimension of hardcore's games on their systems. Nintendo knew that try to have exclusivities from Third Parties wouldn't have been enough to save them. We saw that with Gamecube: better third party support, but only 21 millions systems and a general decline in software's sales of their big franchises. So, they simply tried to attact other people that would have not required games like GTA or Halo or FF on their consoles and this introduced that Blue Ocean Strategy, the DS and the Wii. It is THE solution to escape from the negative circle they were trapped into.

An additional consideration is that Nintendo cannot ignore completely their main franchises that made them so popular in the world and this is the only motivation why Nintendo is still making games like Galaxy or Twilight Princess or Corruption: because Nintendo still need a basis of hardcore, at least for now, until the new, casual audience will buy Marios or Zeldas as hardcore did in the last 20 years (Phantom Hourglass is an example: more suited for casual gamers and sales are good).
Let me sa that performances like TP or Galaxy in Japan are not good signs, because someday Nintendo could distance themself from the hardcore even more, to develop games especially for the casual market, that is very responsive to Nintendo's products.
 

donny2112

Member
Mithos Yggdrasill said:
Nothing from Shinobi ?

He said "when can we expect numbers." Sinobi's already done his usual first day sales post for last week. If you recall when Phantom Hourglass launched on a Saturday, we were in the same situation. I think there might've been a gamefront.de article with questionable numbers, but we didn't get real figures until Wednesday.

We might get a blurb between now and Wednesday, but we can only expect numbers on Wednesday.
 

spwolf

Member
Lobster said:
They should care because they're still paying for the development, publishing and producing of the game. They should atleast release the Wii game earlier than the Ps2 version. Just imagine how Devil Kings 2 would've done on Wii if it were released as a time exclusive for about a month.

Lets just assume Wii version does 150k in a month when its timed exclusive. The company would have those 150k sales plus the Ps2 versions sales.

But..they released them together and now they'll have good Ps2 sales and shit Wii sales.

why would they release it earlier when they get more sales from PS2 version? From money standpoint, it makes no sense. PS2 sales would drop as well if the game was released earlier on Wii.
 

Mushashi

Member
Mithos Yggdrasill said:
because someday Nintendo could distance themself from the hardcore even more, to develop games especially for the casual market, that is very responsive to Nintendo's products.

From Nintendo UK comments, this is already happening.
 
Lobster said:
1. WII Dragon Quest Swords: The Masked Queen and the Tower of Mirrors - 453,445 (20070826)
2. WII Dragon Ball Z Sparking Neo - 157,784 (20070701)
3. WII Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicles - 104,960 (20071118)
4. WII Ennichi no Tatsujin - 104,524 (20070701)
5. WII Naruto: Shippuuden Gekitou Ninja Taisen! EX - 97,123 (20070701)
6. WII One Piece: Unlimited Adventure - 95,203 (20070701)
7. WII Resident Evil 4: Wii Edition - 88,367 (20070701)
8. WII Jikkyou Power Pro Baseball Wii - 72,388 (20070805)
9. WII Bleach: Shattered Blade - 68,728 (20070325)
10. WII Aim!! Fishing Master - 66,278 (20070701)

If anybody didn't noitce, the only games on that list aren't Wii exclusive are RE:WE, Jikkyou and DBZ. Jikkyou sold really horribly..the Ps2 version did like over 150k first week..DBZ sold no where near to its Ps2 counter part.

ehm... according to Famitsu numbers it's over 100k, according to M-C numbers it's over 130k, so why it's listed at 88k ?

and Power Pro Baseball is also listed at 130k by M-C, so it's not properly a disappointment in sales, if it's confirmed, this is the best result for a PawaPuro game on Nintendo consoles since N64 times...
GC had 9,10,11 and 12 (13 was canned due to low sales) and just one title sold more than 100k.
(and this could explain why Konami released other 2 titles in just 4 months, Major League in October and Kettebain coming in December)
 

D.Lo

Member
Lobster said:
When third parties complain about their sales on Nintendo products it is their fault.
While this is true, it's not because PS2 versions get released.

These games being released on PS2 and Wii at the same time are the equivalent of the Xbox 360 Gun/Tony Hawk's American Wasteland/**** Raider Legend etc - PS2 ports that came out on the 360 in it's first year. Slightly upgraded versions that exist only so the new userbase can play the game. They are not the main SKU, they're just an investment in the franchise on a new platform.

Japanese third parties are at least dabbling their feet in Wii development by releasing their PS2 games on the console. They can hardly complain when they do badly/worse then the PS2 version when they're clearly an afterthought. Perhaps if they were ported better (improved graphics/framerate etc, pointer menu integration, motion controls for sports etc)...

But if these companies want to see these series continue, they will have to start investing in a new console's userbase, because while PS2 will do for a while, it is without doubt on it's way out. Basically, third parties need to do this to save console gaming (or at least traditional console gaming) in Japan. They have to pick the Wii or PS3 and go with it, giving the new console version their best effort to make the current buyers move over. Because if they don't, all that will happen is that these series will wither and die.
 

test_account

XP-39C²
According to Shinobi the WiiFit shipment was on 150-300k. If this is correct i guess we wont see any huge numbers (relatively speaking) the first week.
 

loosus

Banned
So third parties should delay PS2 games so that the Wii versions will sell better? I'm sure the publisher is worried where its sales come from.

What will Nintendo fanboys think of next.
 

Jokeropia

Member
Mithos Yggdrasill said:
Japan of course is lost for X360, but there is always the PS3 and that's why Third Parties are making games for both PS3 and X360: the former for Japan. The latter for Occident.
PS3 is worse for third parties than Wii, in Japan as well as worldwide. All the biggest third party games on PS3 in Japan are from million selling franchises that underperformed by orders of magnitude compared to previous installments. Their biggest first party games face the same problems. If you think SMG only beating Sunshine by a relatively small margin (which it is likely to do) is bad, what do you say about Minna no Golf 5 only selling 35% of Minna no Golf 4?
 

sakuragi

Banned
spwolf said:
why would they release it earlier when they get more sales from PS2 version? From money standpoint, it makes no sense. PS2 sales would drop as well if the game was released earlier on Wii.

You read my mind. Good thing publishers aren't fanboys of any console. They love money and when it comes to sales of conventional third party games, the PS2 is still king.
 

sakuragi

Banned
Lobster said:
When third parties complain about their sales on Nintendo products it is their fault.


Uh, going by your not so intelligent logic, third parties should release games on the PS3 first in order to sell well on the PS3 and delay their games on the Xbox 360. So then the PS2 owners could upgrade to the PS3 and then they wont complain about the PS3 software sales :lol .


hmmm, EA should release the next Madden on the PS3 or Wii first and then release it on the Xbox 360 and PS2 later. That way they could maximize their sales? ...................... ...... :lol
 
Dude Lobster, you just got owned by spwolf and sakuragi

I mean hell, sometimes wisdom tumbles out of the mouth of spwolf, but sakuragi?

That's how you know you've said something really silly.
 

sakuragi

Banned
Segata Sanshiro said:
Dude Lobster, you just got owned by spwolf and sakuragi

I mean hell, sometimes wisdom tumbles out of the mouth of spwolf, but sakuragi?

That's how you know you've said something really silly.

Thanks for the compliment but I must say, I wasn't even trying. Although I would prefer if you let the "ownage" speak for itself, no need to rub it in his face.

However, your post did help in is solving this little mystery.I always wondered how can some people post 26 post per day and post something constructive. But now I know that its not possible and most of them were just gebrish, like the one I am quoting.
 
sakuragi said:
Thanks for the compliment but I must say, I wasn't even trying. Although I would prefer if you let the "ownage" speak for itself, no need to rub it in his face.

However, your post did help in is solving this little mystery.I always wondered how can some people post 26 post per day and post something constructive. But now I know that its not possible and most of them were just gebrish, like the one I am quoting.
Coming from someone who makes 100% shit posts, I'll take that as a compliment.

My postcount usually gets inflated from arguing with dunderheads for multiple pages. Unlike my friend ethelred, I actually think I might rattle some sense into people's brains. Of late, I've been starting to see what a foolish venture that is.
 

ethelred

Member
Segata Sanshiro said:
Coming from someone who makes 100% shit posts, I'll take that as a compliment.

My postcount usually gets inflated from arguing with dunderheads for multiple pages. Unlike my friend ethelred, I actually think I might rattle some sense into people's brains. Of late, I've been starting to see what a foolish venture that is.

Oh, I could try to pucture the lance of logic into some lackwit's brain, but it's much more fun to just go for the jugular. There was a time when I made attempts at educating, but now, I'm content with my mockery.
 

donny2112

Member
Moor-Angol said:
ehm... according to Famitsu numbers it's over 100k, according to M-C numbers it's over 130k, so why it's listed at 88k ?

Because that's the last time I have it showing up from Famitsu (in the half-year chart). It'll probably be in the Top 100 for 2007 chart in January.
 

sakuragi

Banned
Segata Sanshiro said:
Coming from someone who makes 100% shit posts, I'll take that as a compliment.

My postcount usually gets inflated from arguing with dunderheads for multiple pages. Unlike my friend ethelred, I actually think I might rattle some sense into people's brains. Of late, I've been starting to see what a foolish venture that is.

The reason your little venture failed miserably is most probably because one should have a little sense in order to talk some sense into senseless individuals. Failure often comes when the teacher trying to teach the student something that he himself does not comprehend. Im afraid you fall under that category.
 
sakuragi said:
The reason your little venture failed miserably is most probably because one should have a little sense in order to talk some sense into senseless individuals. Failure often comes when the teacher trying to teach the student something that he himself does not comprehend. Im afraid you fall under that category.
Oh snap, I just got told. Alright, you win. Now go get back to your little buggery contest.
 
Top Bottom