• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Meta GAF |ON| Gaf on Gaf

Barnabot

Member
I understand Tako Ou getting banned but why Battlechili? The post linked isn't even bad.
I'm sure plenty of people shitting on them are the same people who act like jacking off to Belle Delphine who looks and acts like a 12 year old is just fine.



Well brap. There's a trend. Decide for yourself.
 

brap

Banned

Well brap. There's a trend. Decide for yourself.
So I have to go through somebody's post history to clarify things?
 

kiiltz

Member
It amazes me that people honestly think you can have a proclivity for the weirdest of the weird shit as long as it's animated, and that will have no impact on your character or social interactions. I want to see these people tell their mother the things they gratify themselves to and see if they feel any level of shame then.
Implying that mums would be okay in any other capacity??????

"Hey Ma! You'd never guess what I just masturbated to. They're a real human bein! Did I dun good, did I make ya proud?" - tte toka?
 

Nymphae

Banned
Implying that mums would be okay in any other capacity??????

No, implying that while, yes, it might be embarrassing, I would not feel ashamed for what I was into. Because I have no shame in telling my mother I am sexually attracted to beautiful women.

I want to know if those who are defending vore and animated child porn can say the same. And if not, why?
 
Last edited:

kiiltz

Member
No, implying that while, yes, it might be embarrassing, I would not feel ashamed for what I was into. Because I have no shame in telling my mother I am sexually attracted to beautiful women.

I want to know if those who are defending vore and animated child porn, can say the same.
I was mostly being facetious but that's just stating your sexual attraction, not your fetishes.
 

brap

Banned
Vore and CP fans would have a tough time explaining either I think.
Vore is definitely hard to explain
qmduGAo.png
 
I'm really sad to see that even NeoGAF bans people just like that.

I can see that people feel uncomfortable talking about the topic and such a discussion doesn't really belong in a gaming forum anyway (it's just as annoying to me as SJW gamers permanently complaining about fictional female characters being dressed too lightly, which is one of the core reasons I came to this place anyway, hoping people wouldn't care about that on here), but the correct action here would have been to just not allow threads on such a topic in the first place and lock them on time rather than permanently ban all users that make others feel uncomfortable. Hell even just sending them a PM asking them to not talk about this topic because it makes people feel uncomfortable probably would have been enough to solve the problem.
 

Chittagong

Gold Member
Fuck, I crated a ban bait thread. Genuinely sorry. My joy of holier-than-thou Kotaku getting served got the better of me.

I think there is a valid discussion to be had on where the line is drawn in CP in terms of depictions of minors in the forms of fictional renders and illustrations. Some countries have drawn that line to a place that Kotaku crossed, obviously, and posting uncensored images in a mainstream article is naturally ill-advised.
 

Yoshi

Headmaster of Console Warrior Jugendstrafanstalt
Fuck, I crated a ban bait thread. Genuinely sorry. My joy of holier-than-thou Kotaku getting served got the better of me.

I think there is a valid discussion to be had on where the line is drawn in CP in terms of depictions of minors in the forms of fictional renders and illustrations. Some countries have drawn that line to a place that Kotaku crossed, obviously, and posting uncensored images in a mainstream article is naturally ill-advised.
I did not look at the article for the reason that you described it as pornographic material depicting minors. Opening such content is illegal in Germany, independent of whether it is drawn, animated, or real. But yeah, I do not think it is a clear-cut issue morally.
 

Yoshi

Headmaster of Console Warrior Jugendstrafanstalt
Hm, I don't know.

"Pornografische Darstellungen, die den sexuellen Missbrauch von Kindern zum Gegenstand haben, unterliegen gemäß § 184b Abs. 1 StGB einem absoluten Verbreitungsverbot – auch wenn sie ein fiktives Geschehen zeigen.[3] Sowohl das Verbreiten und Zugänglichmachen als auch entsprechende Vorbereitungshandlungen werden mit Freiheitsstrafe von drei Monaten bis zu fünf Jahren bestraft. Der Besitz von Darstellungen, die ein rein fiktives, nicht wirklichkeitsnahes Geschehen wiedergeben (vgl. § 184b Abs. 3 StGB), ist dagegen nicht rechtswidrig."

English: Basically saying sharing is illegal but possession is not if the fictional event is far from any real event.

Plus, seeing something accidentally on a website might not even be considered possession. It's still a grey area. Just like streaming.
I do not know where you got this, but here is the actual § 184b:
(1) Mit Freiheitsstrafe von drei Monaten bis zu fünf Jahren wird bestraft, wer 1.
eine kinderpornographische Schrift verbreitet oder der Öffentlichkeit zugänglich macht; kinderpornographisch ist eine pornographische Schrift (§ 11 Absatz 3), wenn sie zum Gegenstand hat: a)
sexuelle Handlungen von, an oder vor einer Person unter vierzehn Jahren (Kind),
b)
die Wiedergabe eines ganz oder teilweise unbekleideten Kindes in unnatürlich geschlechtsbetonter Körperhaltung oder
c)
die sexuell aufreizende Wiedergabe der unbekleideten Genitalien oder des unbekleideten Gesäßes eines Kindes,
2.
es unternimmt, einer anderen Person den Besitz an einer kinderpornographischen Schrift, die ein tatsächliches oder wirklichkeitsnahes Geschehen wiedergibt, zu verschaffen,
3.
eine kinderpornographische Schrift, die ein tatsächliches Geschehen wiedergibt, herstellt oder
4.
eine kinderpornographische Schrift herstellt, bezieht, liefert, vorrätig hält, anbietet, bewirbt oder es unternimmt, diese Schrift ein- oder auszuführen, um sie oder aus ihr gewonnene Stücke im Sinne der Nummer 1 oder 2 oder des § 184d Absatz 1 Satz 1 zu verwenden oder einer anderen Person eine solche Verwendung zu ermöglichen, soweit die Tat nicht nach Nummer 3 mit Strafe bedroht ist.
The definition of "child pornography" under point 1 clearly includes fictional content. Point 4 is the one talking about obtaining, it does not limit to point 2's stricter "close to reality" (it clearly says according to point 1 OR 2) if it is not already covered by 3.
 
Yes, you're right. I already regret letting myself get baited to reply. I apologize. I already removed my posts.

The only thing I wanted to get across is that I'm sad that NeoGAF just outright bans people like that.
 

Xaero Gravity

NEXT LEVEL lame™
I'm not able to understand the tone of your posts at all. Are you are role playing someone on the forum by any chance?
You and me both. I think I'm just an overly sensitive try hard that desperately wants to be accepted by people here, but I'm pretty bad at it. Since I'm banned from Era, you guys won my affection by default
 
Last edited:

Shifty

Member
Cunth disappearance theory: The man is secretly an Old God powered by faith, and the dissolution of the autocunth avatar movement put his belief levels below the corporeality threshold.

What have we done.

You and me both. I think I'm just an overly sensitive try hard that desperately wants to be accepted by people here, but I'm pretty bad at it. Since I'm banned from Era, you guys won my affection by default
Is this like Twitch Acting?
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom