michaelius
Banned
You were doing okay but that paragraph just reads as completely made up, in that regard...
What if he works in Microsoft HQ?
You were doing okay but that paragraph just reads as completely made up, in that regard...
Didn't he say shipped and not sold?
That's achieved through price drops. Eventually, all of the people interested in a $400 console will have bought one. At that point, they drop the price to $350, and so on. That's why the PS1 and PS2 got price drops, despite having little or no competition.It depends for all it's 80 million install base the PS3 still managed to completely sink any profits accrued from the PS1 and PS2. I imagine significant profits on hardware are worth it if you can get away with it (as in still remain a decent and consistent selling rate.
Phil Harrison said they're over 5 million units sold. So I'll take a safe guess and say they're just barely over 5 million. 5,050,000 or something.
Where are you getting these numbers from?That's a bit different. They lost $300 per $499 console sold and $250 for every $599 console sold.
Because there's no need to advertise the fact that it plays games. It's the new fucking Xbox. Xbox. A gaming device. It's obvious the thing plays games, they wanted to advertise it based on the new features it had that are unique to only it. Watching TV and video Skype while multitasking an app, plus efficient voice navigation.
Do you have the same complaint when iPhone commercial don't spend the entire commercial showcasing the ability to talk? It's a fucking phone of course it can call. What else can it do?
Where are you getting these numbers from?
So if less than 20K/wk is the base demand for the Kinected model in the US, what will be the base demand for the diKinected one? Surely not the 36K/wk it sold in June, since that likely represents the bulk of the people who'd been holding out hope of getting the console without the camera.
When it comes down to it, I think Kinect is still the primary differentiator between XBox and PlayStation. With PS4 being the same price, significantly more powerful, and with arguably better first-party offerings, there's really not much to draw people to the XBox platform this generation apart from Kinect. Offering the console without Kinect will bump their sales, to be sure, but how much? Even if it doubles the demand for the platform in the long term, that's still only 35-40K/wk in their biggest market by far.
Here's another interesting thing about the 55% figure. So they sold 108K in the US. If the US still represent 60% of their WW sales, that's as many as 180K of the new SKU worldwide. If the US is up around 70% for them now which seems entirely possible given their performance in mainland Europe then that would be 154K.
So given that in Q3, they told us they were already overstocked on XBones with cameras, and then they needed to stock the shelves for their re-launch in June, are we assuming that most or all of the 470-600K XBones they shipped this quarter were the new model? That being the case, wouldn't that mean there are already 290-445K of the new ones sitting on shelves. So like, 2-3x what it sold during its launch month? Wouldn't that indicate Tier 1 retailers are pretty much stocked for Q1, and most/all of the Q1 shipments will be going to support the Tier 2 launch?
Because there's no need to advertise the fact that it plays games. It's the new fucking Xbox. Xbox. A gaming device. It's obvious the thing plays games, they wanted to advertise it based on the new features it had that are unique to only it. Watching TV and video Skype while multitasking an app, plus efficient voice navigation.
Do you have the same complaint when iPhone commercial don't spend the entire commercial showcasing the ability to talk? It's a fucking phone of course it can call. What else can it do?
But what if the game looks similar on 360 as it does to the one (case in point Titanfall was kind of similar situation) . 360 has a large install base and may have the most copies of Destiny sold on that console... What I'm saying is, a 360 owner has no real reason to upgrade to a "one"Summer is slow...I doubt much will happen until Destiny drops...Thus begins the fall rush of games.
I think its obvious that Titanfall was not the system seller that MS intended it to be. As such, I think Destiny will have a huge impact in the coming months. People will buy the console that has most of their friends playing on it. My bet is a lot of gamers will buy Destiny for both consoles. Since Sony seems to have made some deals with Bungie, Ps4 along with their already larger base already has an advantage.
Actually, every single commercial from the first set of iPhone ads did convey the message that it was a phone. That's probably why it was a successful advertising campaign.Do you have the same complaint when iPhone commercial don't spend the entire commercial showcasing the ability to talk? It's a fucking phone of course it can call. What else can it do?
Where are you getting these numbers from?
The fact that the first commercial their aired focused wholly on SPORTS AND TV and didn't show a second of any videogames is indicative of their downfall in terms of focus. I don't think there were too many people who knew of the Xbox 360, watched that commercial, and then panicked that the new one wouldn't play games.Because there's no need to advertise the fact that it plays games. It's the new fucking Xbox. Xbox. A gaming device. It's obvious the thing plays games, they wanted to advertise it based on the new features it had that are unique to only it. Watching TV and video Skype while multitasking an app, plus efficient voice navigation.
Do you have the same complaint when iPhone commercial don't spend the entire commercial showcasing the ability to talk? It's a fucking phone of course it can call. What else can it do?
This is why Apple is successful at these things. Simple messages, conveyed clearly, showing functionality that people will likely find useful. This is why you don't have people dancing around like idiots showing off one stupid gimmick that no one cares about.Actually, every single commercial from the first set of iPhone ads did convey the message that it was a phone. That's probably why it was a successful advertising campaign.
Here are seven early iPhone commercials; phone functionality appears in each one, either receiving or making a call:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37fMdoU8kyY
This is why Apple is successful at these things. Simple messages, conveyed clearly, showing functionality that people will likely find useful. This is why you don't have people dancing around like idiots showing off one stupid gimmick that no one cares about.
It's actually a nice feature, just a godawful ad. Trying to give it "personality" I guess. Their Surface Pro 3 ad was much better (and impressive as an ad--it's all one take): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTo5DfBtWkY
Microsoft figures out what they need to do...just...slowly.
This is why Apple is successful at these things. Simple messages, conveyed clearly, showing functionality that people will likely find useful. This is why you don't have people dancing around like idiots showing off one stupid gimmick that no one cares about.
How can an official video be 480p?
That's going to be the McDLT Commercial of the 2010's.
How can an official video be 480p?
The NFL totally swindled Microsoft on that deal. It's really amazing.
Spencer and team led the development of brand new entertainment offerings including a landmark partnership with the NFL and collaborating with industry luminary Steven Spielberg to bring a new Halo live action TV series to life.
And Phil Spencer was the one who made it happen! (along with the TV TV stuff)
Puts the "I believe in Spencer!" stuff in an awkward context...
Spencer and team led the development of brand new entertainment offerings including a landmark partnership with the NFL and collaborating with industry luminary Steven Spielberg to bring a new Halo live action TV series to life.
oh snap!
hmm, didn't the whole halo series get scrapped? i could be wrong...
According to Showtime boss David Nevins, Halo the TV series is still on track despite the closure of Xbox Entertainment Studios, but Nevins fell short of confirming that everything will end well.
damn, that's trippy.
I still got a xbo at launch to give it a chance for old time's sake. I later realized it had no gaming soul. Not surprising since that was hardly MS's initial vision, and it still echoes in the console today.
Because there's no need to advertise the fact that it plays games. It's the new fucking Xbox. Xbox. A gaming device. It's obvious the thing plays games, they wanted to advertise it based on the new features it had that are unique to only it. Watching TV and video Skype while multitasking an app, plus efficient voice navigation.
Do you have the same complaint when iPhone commercial don't spend the entire commercial showcasing the ability to talk? It's a fucking phone of course it can call. What else can it do?
And Phil Spencer was the one who made it happen! (along with the TV TV stuff)
Puts the "I believe in Spencer!" stuff in an awkward context...
No gaming soul?
No. There was a new article today that I didn't think was thread worthy.
Source: http://www.techtimes.com/articles/1...th-of-xbox-entertainment-studios-showtime.htm
No gaming soul?
Never believed in Spencer, not sure why he got a free pass when he was knee deep in the sewage like shit doesn't stick. He was as guilty as Medhi Yusuf and Don't Mattrick, the only difference is Mattrick didn't survive this and ended up taking the bulk of the blame and Yusuf wasn't as slick.And Phil Spencer was the one who made it happen! (along with the TV TV stuff)
Puts the "I believe in Spencer!" stuff in an awkward context...
According to Showtime boss David Nevins, Halo the TV series is still on track despite the closure of Xbox Entertainment Studios, but Nevins fell short of confirming that everything will end well.
Never believed in Spencer, not sure why he got a free pass when he was knee deep in the sewage like shit doesn't stick. He was as guilty as Medhi Yusuf and Don't Mattrick, the only difference is Mattrick didn't survive this and ended up taking the bulk of the blame and Yusuf wasn't as slick.
Never believed in Spencer, not sure why he got a free pass when he was knee deep in the sewage like shit doesn't stick. He was as guilty as Medhi Yusuf and Don't Mattrick, the only difference is Mattrick didn't survive this and ended up taking the bulk of the blame and Yusuf wasn't as slick.
And Phil Spencer was the one who made it happen! (along with the TV TV stuff)
Puts the "I believe in Spencer!" stuff in an awkward context...
If the payday Mattrick got is considered "not surviving", sign me up for not surviving now!
If the 360 is more than half of the 1.1 million shipments, where is it all going? Sales haven't been great for it in the US, and Europe would be selling less than the US, and Japan..., is MS stuffing 360's into the channel as well?
I still think Xbox One is a majority of the 1.1 million, historical data be damned.
I'd say any where between 4.6-4.8 million.
I'm assuming Xbox 360 shipped more simply because it's available in more markets than the Xbox One. Xbox 360 also saw the release of Titanfall on April 8th. Xbox360 also has been moving more software, globally, than Xbox One. For those thinking 300k is too low. Microsoft mentioned they would be slowing production in order to allow retailers to move the some of their inventory. 900k were already in the retail chain at the beginning of 2014. Microsoft stuffed another 1.2 million expecting big numbers from Titanfall. I'm betting it's somewhere closer to 4.6 million. Otherwise Microsoft wouldn't have felt the need to slow production down.
It's still early so nobody's counting MSFT out. This generation has just started and they could make up a lot of ground. Sony should be releasing their report in early August (2 weeks after MSFT releases theirs). Grab some popcorn that day because it's going to get good on Neogaf.
Sony report is July 31.
Nintendo report is July 30.
Next week already.
This has been debunked pretty thoroughly.
Thanks. So the chance of Wii U out-shipping Xbox One is almost guaranteed at this point, right?
Any guesses on PS4's install base numbers anyone
Thanks. So the chance of Wii U out-shipping Xbox One is almost guaranteed at this point, right?
Any guesses on PS4's install base numbers anyone
Thanks. So the chance of Wii U out-shipping Xbox One is almost guaranteed at this point, right?
Not to mention Phil Spencer was also formerly head of MGS, which is renowned for their... well, let's say "underwhelming" output compared to Nintendo and Sony. Don't get me wrong, I think he'll do better than Mattrick, but I really don't get all the love. Especially up towards E3 when everyone was hyping him up and all he delivered was multiplats and CGI trailers for games we won't see for years (I'll get excited for them next E3, when we actually see them in action).
So yea, I honestly don't get all the love
LMAO!!!!! Was trying to put a positive spin on all this bad Xbox news. Sorry
I think that would be highly unlikely.
I like your "divide by seven" strategy, but I wonder if it gives us an inflated sense of the demand for the new SKU, as I imagine there are some number of people who've been waiting since launch to buy the core console. Maybe it's only 20-30K, but that can alter things fairly significantly, as now that they finally have their consoles, they don't really represent much in the way of sustained demand. It would be akin to assuming their "100k/day" back in November would continue forever. See what I mean?Well presumably May was disastrous for MS because of their early announcement which seems reasonable thus signifying consumers not interested in kinect waiting until June
Well, if you don't mind, let's try to break this down for a minute. As I recall, of the 3M they claimed sold in 2013, 60% were in the US, right? 1.8M? If that ratio is holding true, then with 2.9M in the US, they'd be at 4.8M worldwide. If it's 65%, as you suggest, then we'd be looking at WW sales of 4.5M, and a 70% US concentration would give them a total of 4.1M units sold through.Personally I would be wary of assuming too much of a change in US/WW sales ratios simply because it's a powerful ratio. A change of 10% can alter your WW install base by quite a bit. At most I think even with how US centric XB1 is it's probably more to the order of 65% at most. That's just my gut feeling on the matter though
26 countries add up pretty quickly. That's a lot of distribution centers to fill. If they entice all of them with their "Buy 15K; get 5K" Launch Day Saleathon, that's over half a million units. Granted, they won't need to restock Tier 2 for a year or two, but the extra 500K will be a nice PR bump going in to the holidays, and they can bill the $52M hardware writedown to Marketing.It wouldn't surprise me if Q1 shipments are mostly towards Tier 2 countries but at the same time, those markets aren't particularly large so who knows?
Any guesses on PS4's install base numbers anyone
I like your "divide by seven" strategy, but I wonder if it gives us an inflated sense of the demand for the new SKU, as I imagine there are some number of people who've been waiting since launch to buy the core console. Maybe it's only 20-30K, but that can alter things fairly significantly, as now that they finally have their consoles, they don't really represent much in the way of sustained demand. It would be akin to assuming their "100k/day" back in November would continue forever. See what I mean?
I was thinking that May would be fairly telling, in that it might reveal how many people actually want the camera. Then lo and behold, average weekly sales of cameras was virtually the same in June as it was in May. However, I'd assumed the TF bundles were already gone. So are you telling me what they've been selling 18K/wk of is the $500 console + camera + TF bundle, and now they're pulling the game from the bundle, making it even less appealing? Yeesh. Well, if nothing else, I guess that tells us they aren't willing to break the bank buying market share.
SKU | March | April | May | June | July so far |
------------------------------------------------------------------
PS4 STD | 01 | 05 | 06 | 08 | 11
XB1 Kinect | 76 | ?? | ?? | ?? | ??
XB1 TF | 11 | 24 | 39 | 50 | ??
XB1 KL | NA | NA | NA | 49 | 56
Well, if you don't mind, let's try to break this down for a minute. As I recall, of the 3M they claimed sold in 2013, 60% were in the US, right? 1.8M? If that ratio is holding true, then with 2.9M in the US, they'd be at 4.8M worldwide. If it's 65%, as you suggest, then we'd be looking at WW sales of 4.5M, and a 70% US concentration would give them a total of 4.1M units sold through.
So where did they sell these units? They sold 2.9M in the US, obviously. I believe someone said 500-600K for the UK? Is that right? It sounds fairly reasonable. So that gives us 3.4-3.5M units accounted for. Agreed? If they're holding at 60%, that would mean "Tier 1.5" — Germany, Australia, etc. — would need to have purchased ~1.4 units since launch. ~1.1M in Tier 1.5 would put them at 65% US, and ~700K for 70%.
Follow? lol Okay, so we're looking for 700-1400K units in Tier 1.5. Where do we find them, exactly? I think Germany is the largest not-US/UK/JP market, right? So maybe half of what UK has purchased, and half of Germany for Australia? Oh, maybe another 250K in Canada? So that's 662K in T1.5. I know it pretty much flopped in Spain. Where else can they even sell a significant number of units? France? I can see 700K in not-US/UK, but 1100-1400K? iwannaseethereceipts.gif
Sorry, but I keep seeing WW estimates of 4.5-4.8M, but no one can explain where they were sold. All I usually get is, "I dunno; I just can't imagine they're doing that badly…" lol
I saw that. It seemed like a pretty reasonable estimate. EDIT:I tried a new estimation approach a day or so ago that I thought would be more accurate. Puts PS4 WW LTD at around 8.68M as of July 5th
I don't get why some are so quick to berate the "I believe in Phil Spencer" meme. Its just a fun avatar meme, similar to the luigi hats, Kaz heads, beanies, etc.Puts the "I believe in Spencer!" stuff in an awkward context...