thelastword
Banned
I could have told you that OP and I did do so too, over the last few years, if you've been following tech threads.....that is...
The parity on destiny was clearly obvious, remember when I said MS sent a team of engineers to boost the game on XBOX-ONE, they also sent a team of monee-ngineers too. Destiny could have looked and run so much better on PS4, but they spent lots of time and resources getting the Xbox version up to par.
Ubisoft though takes the cake; egalite, fraternite, liberte ... Division 1, they went for parity and gimping the PS4 version, those downgrades we saw had a lot to do with Xbox one. AC Unity was the biggest sin though. 900p on both consoles and better performance on Xbox, when other games had a 1080p to 720p divide vs Xbox and still better performance and effects. This was the most blatant from Ubi, but everyone knows that Ubisoft is on record saying they gimped the PS4 version, because debates and stuff? Ms and it's fans don't like the debates......
Witcher 3 was blatant, better performance and some reflections on Xbox, marketing deal, Ms dollars, it's clear. Hell, Pro could have had a patch for said game eons ago, but they were too busy. Xbonex got a solid patch with more features, they sure took their time on that version. Pretty much the whole Witcher 3 situation on PS4 including all the promises to fix the bog was a farce, the bog is still not a locked 30fps on Pro for crying out loud, it falls to 27, 26fps still. That hdr implementation was a joke, but clearly, if Xbox One runs the Witcher about on par as a pro in the bog on average, that's all you need to know.
Then we move to Capcom. They need the money, just like Xbox fans say Obsidian needs the money. Strider, where's the AF.... Revelations 2? The most blatant for me from them. 1080p on both consoles, 20+fps uplift on a weak box like Xbox One over PS4 in certain scenes, but get this, alpha heavy scenes, you simply can't make this stuff up.
Now this same MS is saying Sony is anti-consumer, not sharing its base with them, whilst they nickel and dime their base with an Xblive paywall for FREE TO PLAY Games..... Clearly denied PS players much better versions of games, but now it's kumbaya times and the MS horde is bent out of shape pushing a destructive MS agenda in the name of consumer rights, when they know its anything but genuine, whilst Ms goes into full throttle motion sans vaseline with pay to access free to play games and betas on that very horde, deny them good games for five years, but here they are. At least if you had great games to show.... but nothing......
Yet some want an MS paved future, who has the most anti-consumer practices coined-up and known about in the corporate world with Nvidia being the ever studious apprentice in the here and now......
Is it coincidence that all these games were gimped? Sigh! .....Yet baffling that some people would choose to deny that MS has still not rescinded on it's 2013 plan and callous policies...
The parity on destiny was clearly obvious, remember when I said MS sent a team of engineers to boost the game on XBOX-ONE, they also sent a team of monee-ngineers too. Destiny could have looked and run so much better on PS4, but they spent lots of time and resources getting the Xbox version up to par.
Ubisoft though takes the cake; egalite, fraternite, liberte ... Division 1, they went for parity and gimping the PS4 version, those downgrades we saw had a lot to do with Xbox one. AC Unity was the biggest sin though. 900p on both consoles and better performance on Xbox, when other games had a 1080p to 720p divide vs Xbox and still better performance and effects. This was the most blatant from Ubi, but everyone knows that Ubisoft is on record saying they gimped the PS4 version, because debates and stuff? Ms and it's fans don't like the debates......
Witcher 3 was blatant, better performance and some reflections on Xbox, marketing deal, Ms dollars, it's clear. Hell, Pro could have had a patch for said game eons ago, but they were too busy. Xbonex got a solid patch with more features, they sure took their time on that version. Pretty much the whole Witcher 3 situation on PS4 including all the promises to fix the bog was a farce, the bog is still not a locked 30fps on Pro for crying out loud, it falls to 27, 26fps still. That hdr implementation was a joke, but clearly, if Xbox One runs the Witcher about on par as a pro in the bog on average, that's all you need to know.
Then we move to Capcom. They need the money, just like Xbox fans say Obsidian needs the money. Strider, where's the AF.... Revelations 2? The most blatant for me from them. 1080p on both consoles, 20+fps uplift on a weak box like Xbox One over PS4 in certain scenes, but get this, alpha heavy scenes, you simply can't make this stuff up.
Now this same MS is saying Sony is anti-consumer, not sharing its base with them, whilst they nickel and dime their base with an Xblive paywall for FREE TO PLAY Games..... Clearly denied PS players much better versions of games, but now it's kumbaya times and the MS horde is bent out of shape pushing a destructive MS agenda in the name of consumer rights, when they know its anything but genuine, whilst Ms goes into full throttle motion sans vaseline with pay to access free to play games and betas on that very horde, deny them good games for five years, but here they are. At least if you had great games to show.... but nothing......
Yet some want an MS paved future, who has the most anti-consumer practices coined-up and known about in the corporate world with Nvidia being the ever studious apprentice in the here and now......
Is it coincidence that all these games were gimped? Sigh! .....Yet baffling that some people would choose to deny that MS has still not rescinded on it's 2013 plan and callous policies...
Last edited:
