While Microsoft own Minecraft they have never treated it like an exclusive, Minecraft doesn't mean all Microsoft Studio ports are free game.They should port Rare stuff too.
While Microsoft own Minecraft they have never treated it like an exclusive, Minecraft doesn't mean all Microsoft Studio ports are free game.
Just buy Nintendo already MS.
Was the Wii U version ever patched with this?
Imagine having a great customer service, great refund policy and countless of other great policies and user friendly environment.
No thanks.
Portability is a big deal, especially in Japan. If I recall correctly, the Vita version was the most successful game on that platform in Japan, right? I seem to remember something like that.Man, I own this game on 4 different consoles, what's another one to the pile. This will be a great game for the pick up and play.
They'd probably make more money releasing old rare games on Nintendo systems than they would on their own
Portability is a big deal, especially in Japan. If I recall correctly, the Vita version was the most successful game on that platform in Japan, right? I seem to remember something like that.
Find out on the 18th I guess.So, will this be a direct port of PS360 version, or can we expect some upgrades like bigger maps?
If you own it on PC pretty sure there's a mod like that already availableIf they announce a Zelda mashup pack, I will bite despite having MC on everything else.
By leaps and bounds.Portability is a big deal, especially in Japan. If I recall correctly, the Vita version was the most successful game on that platform in Japan, right? I seem to remember something like that.
Should do really well on the Switch then. Nintendo seems to be counting on it as their centerpiece release for May.By leaps and bounds.
Vita true killer app in Japan which came late and lifted up sales.
Just buy Nintendo already MS.Now that would have chance against Sony Empire.
How well on WiiU?Minecraft does very well on everything.
You literally just admitted Minecraft UK Live are owned by Microsoft, then go on to say it's not Microsoft streaming, although you had just admitted the two are one and the same. What's your beef?They belong to Microsoft, yes. But still they are the Minecraft UK Live Streaming Channel, so it would be more accurate to use this in the title, instead of Microsoft. Kinda reaching... As if satya nadella is now going there and streaming minecraft lol
Insane that this wasn't the first replyI wonder how long until Nintendo asks them to take down their stream.
Ballmer, right?Microsoft is trying to butter up Nintendo so they put Steve in Smash. Shameless.
Switch will probably end up being the best platform to play on.
Yeah I'm thinking this might be the format to actually get me to try it.I think I'm finally buying Minecraft
That's really good that they secured Minecraft so quickly.
Didn't Microsoft try to buy Nintendo in Gamecube days? I read it somewhere long ago.
Microsoft will be streaming the Switch version of Minecraft on April 18th
I know people saying they would hate if MS bought Nintendo but I would probably prefer it . Probably one of the only people that feels that way but either way its not going to happen so oh well
I know people saying they would hate if MS bought Nintendo but I would probably prefer it . Probably one of the only people that feels that way but either way its not going to happen so oh well
First I've heard. I know they thought they had Donkey Kong when buying Rare,
I believe Microsoft tried to buy Nintendo when they (Microsoft) were first entering the console market.
Microsoft buying Nintendo, not that it would happen, could be good or bad depending on how Microsoft lets Nintendo operate. It would be good in terms of production and hardware as Microsoft would make products like the Switch better, but Nintendo is nothing if it isn't allowed to innovate.
Regardless, it's cool that Microsoft is handling Minecraft well.
Just buy Nintendo already MS.Now that would have chance against Sony Empire.
I honestly don't think Microsoft could have made the Switch better. From a hardware perspective the thing is designed about as well as it can be considering the price and size. They could have made the OS better for sure but unless it was the price of a Surface or had a 30 minute battery the Switch can't get much better.
I meant in terms of the OS, Virtual Console (Microsoft owns backwards compatibility and with Microsoft's policy of own it once, own it forever, older Nintendo game ownership would cross systems), achievements, general online practices, etc.
So, will this be a direct port of PS360 version, or can we expect some upgrades like bigger maps?
I'd imagine much more upgrades, since the Switch has 6X more RAM available than PS360.
Why would you prefer it? Microsoft's first party output is pretty low and it seems rare for them to greenlight projects. Nintendo always puts games out that they know won't sell millions (Wonderful 101 and Bayonetta 2 for instance), if they were part of Microsoft they wouldn't be the same company anymore.
I also don't want the only drastically different machine on the market to go away, competition is great.
Maybe not prefer as much as wouldn't mind. I think the current after 2013 MS would handle owning Nintendo differently than earlier MS . Just a opinion though
How well on WiiU?
Microsoft has never had a problem supporting Nintendo handhelds. Didn't Viva Pinata and Blue Dragon see DS releases?