Wuthering_Heights
Banned
It's not taking anything away from you, why do you care?
He CARES about the Vita, man.
Can't you tell?
It's not taking anything away from you, why do you care?
If this would force their first party studios to actually acknowledge Vita's existence then I'd have no problem with it. PS3 really doesn't need anymore games.
If this would force their first party studios to actually acknowledge Vita's existence then I'd have no problem with it. PS3 really doesn't need anymore games.
nvm... haters gon hate.
Timed exclusive can be enough to make a new platform look good. Minna no Golf 6 has its chance on Vita.
Would have been terrible if they announced from the beginning it would be coming to PS3 at some point but it wasn't.
Hence the emerging "will wait to play this on my PS3" meme.On the other hand, there is no reason for anyone wanting to take the leap on a Vita for Sony titles to think they won't just be on PS3, as well.
If porting is easy why not?
On the other hand, there is no reason for anyone wanting to take the leap on a Vita for Sony titles to think they won't just be on PS3, as well.
Hence the emerging "will wait to play this on my PS3" meme.
All Vita has at this point are Sony titles.
Yea me neither - PS3 version IQ was as bad as any of the PS2 (or PSP) games - Vita one at least had AA. But I can't help but hold out hope that they would be doing improvements and trickle them back into a Vita hi-res patch. It's painful watching the Opening Video in the game rendered in VitaNative res seeing how the game "could" have looked like...mrklaw said:Hopefully they clean up the image quality but based on the previous versions I wouldn't hold my breath.
Cross-buy might help there - and besides this is a common issue with console->PC ports and that only ever hurt the PC side, even though it's the "superior" platform.shockingalberto said:On the other hand, there is no reason for anyone wanting to take the leap on a Vita for Sony titles to think they won't just be on PS3, as well.
Ascension should have been vita exclusive I think.
Being a spin-off and not IV there doesn't seem to be alot of excitement around it... I think it would have been a better fit for vita than ps3 and there would be more hype for it.
Hence the emerging "will wait to play this on my PS3" meme.
AC3: Liberation may be the best upcoming Vita game. In some ways it seems like they're putting even more of an effort into it than the console versions. Those are safe to some of the things that they're doing with the Liberation. The persona system is especially cool.
I like Gravity Rush. What I mean is, when I you can buy a Vita game on a home console which you already own, then why bother with buying Vita?
P4G is one of the best JRPGs of all time.All Vita has at this point are Sony titles.
AC doesn't fit any standard definition of "team" (several hundred people working in multiple different studios) - in fact HSG team probably has more in common with AC:L then the other way around (and in terms of budget too).OldJadedGamer said:Look at Hot Shots, done by the main team. Full effort given to it.
This game is hard.
Portability. The only true advantage Vita has over an HD game.
._.I need new pants! This is excellent news!
In that sense, it is no surprise indeed. It isnt that unusual that games that preform poorly gets ported later on, trying to get more sales. But i dont think anyone saw this coming.The game bombed hard on Vita and burned the brand pretty bad so I say it's no surprise that Sony wants to give the game another chance.
Just curious, do you own a Vita?Now that I know they will start doing this I'll just wait for the PS3 versions.
Why is it often assumed that less effort is being put into a game because it is done by another team? Did people say that Batman Arkham Asylum was being developed by a B team because Rocksteady Games had only made one game earlier, which wasnt really reviewed very high?The Vita version isn't being handled by the main team and handed off to a B team instead. Also, has it been confirmed that the Vita version has multiplayer? It UbiSoft was putting more effort into AC:L it would be handled by the main team.
Look at Hot Shots, done by the main team. Full effort given to it.
Most spinoffs have a smaller dev-budget, smaller marketting budget, and respectively lower review scores and/or game quality. On internet that's perceived as reduced effort by the parent company of course.test_account said:Why is it often assumed that less effort is being put into a game because it is done by another team?
That makes sense, i can see why there might be some doubts because of the reasons you mention there. But often (generally speaking, not saying it is the case here) it seems to be more directed towards that the game automatically will be bad/not-so-good because it isnt done by the main team.Most spinoffs have a smaller dev-budget, smaller marketting budget, and respectively lower review scores and/or game quality. On internet that's perceived as reduced effort by the parent company of course.
I don't think it's particularly fair to equate that to team expertise and/or talent though.
._.
I own a Vita and PS3 but haven't paid much attention to my Vita. I like Hot Shots and I'm glad it's getting a PS3 entry, now more of my friends can enjoy it.
It makes sense now that it has been announced, but i dont think anyone saw it coming. Just look at the first page in this thread, several of comments shows that people didnt expect this to happen. Personally i dont think i ever saw a prediction for that Minna no Golf 6 would be ported to PS3.This topic got fairly interesting.
Anyway, I will say Takao may be right to be alarmed, but really, who didn't see this coming?
Awesome. I love what Sony is doing with Cross Play for multiplayer games. Wonder if buyers of the PS3 version will get the Vita version for free. That could encourage Vita sales in the long run.
I guess we can expect GT6 to be PS3/Vita too now?
Awesome.
Next up, port all of Wipeout 2048's tracks to HD Fury, por favor.