Masked_Ninja
Member
Here's some UI but its old and only the tv guide feature.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifa9Q7ATfVA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifa9Q7ATfVA
An actual inside source with proof? Rather than the " someone told me that Xbox live and snap feature causing crashes"
Of course they could, people are just defending Penello rather silly comment. If random YouTubers making knock off AVGN videos can do it, so can one of worlds wealthiest companies.
GAF never fails to outdo its GIFs.![]()
All Credit to Lovely Salsa for this gem.
I don't understand... Sony launches sooner and there's no UI vid to speak of. And no, "Dude, I don't have that, man." doesn't count.
Even if MS put something together now, using already licensed assets, its too late. The GAF hate machine it so spun up they no one here would believe anything they say anyway. "Star Trek again! This shit is so fake!"
This. Why would they even bother; people will call it fake and they wasted time getting this sorted. Even if they were to show it off on a stage with a live audience, it would still be called fake.
Who owns the license on crashing?
*rimshot*
*dodges thrown fruit*
Someone is very confused about it. You.
As in, you can't allocate a buffer larger than 8MB on it, even if you can have four such buffers? I really doubt that's the case. Where did you hear that from? Also, I'm pretty sure there's a pretty solid channel of communication between CPU and ESRAM on XB1.XB1'S eSRAM is used differently that WiiU's eDRAM
For example, WiiU's eDRAM is one block of 32MB sitting in the GPU but accessible by the CPU.
eSRAM is broken down into 4 blocks of 8MB. And I believe the CPU doesn't really have access to it.
They worked out the "legal departments and contracts" to produce the fake video we are all seeing, however.
Spare me.
Most of the posts on here regarding the tweet completely proves that virtually NOBODY in this thread works in a company as large as Microsoft.
Microsoft has contracts that they are RESPONSIBLE by LAW to uphold 100%. Maybe one of their agreements with their advert companies is NOT to blur their content out for demos, it would not be the first time that has happened.
Not to mention licensing involves both companies legal departments and contracts. Its not as simple as flipping a fucking switch like most of you would want to believe. Its absolutely pathetic the level this console fanboy war has gotten to
The real question that the are looking at:
"Is it worth our time doing all of this to feed a never ending request for more information or is it better to spend the time making sure it works?"
I think the latter makes more sense. To do the offline video you lose most of what they were showing because you are disconnected from Live.
Did someone say 3?
![]()
It is NOT always that simple. Blurring content is NOT always technically legal.
![]()
All Credit to Lovely Salsa for this gem.
So famousmortimer, and thuway having been verified with the mods means nothing?
Matt in all his glory means nothing?
Proelite means nothing?
Robert Florence means nothing?
The general apprehension by all of MS to discuss or show the UI means nothing?
If it makes you feel better I've seen half of mort's face and thuway in a nice suit
Define credible?
Most of the posts on here regarding the tweet completely proves that virtually NOBODY in this thread works in a company as large as Microsoft.
I'm sure they did too, a long time ago. I don't think they were expecting to produce a live demo of the dash and release it in the same way they did the "fake" one.
So, again, they can't just flip a switch and throw that out for us. Not that i'm trying to play devil's advocate, but I can't really take his statement as straight dodging the issue.
OMG. That is an amazing GIF. I'm dying over here.![]()
All Credit to Lovely Salsa for this gem.
The fuck is this none sense?
Pretty sad MS has allowed PSN to get ahead of Live (assuming this is true) given the PS3 never quite reached parity with the 360's online feature set. Then again, with the rumors of complete redesigning how live works with games and them running 3 OS's on the thing I'm not completely surprised how mucked up it's gotten.
Yes, and? you dont think those happened over night do you?
Words fail me![]()
Could have been easily spun. The fact is nobody has used , in any depth, either UI, simply because they aren't ready yet for either system.
But there has been no UI footage released that isn't either fake or from that kid in september on a beta build
UI for PS4 has been shown at gamescom and the dev UI was leaked by french devs
As in, you can't allocate a buffer larger than 8MB on it, even if you can have four such buffers? I really doubt that's the case. Where did you hear that from? Also, I'm pretty sure there's a pretty solid channel of communication between CPU and ESRAM on XB1.
Well obviously, I just said that, why are you telling me something I already just said you silly boy?..
How did THIS post fall through the cracks?
He does have a point. MS fucked up by not having this already shown/ready. But Pennello can't just unilaterally film a walkthrough and throw it up on youtube in like 15 minutes per GAF's request.
Still, MS should have been past this.
My company has 10,000 employees... We almost there!Most of the posts on here regarding the tweet completely proves that virtually NOBODY in this thread works in a company as large as Microsoft.
They won't. They don't want to.Overdelivering on value.
Get your shit together, Microsoft.
Super low latency and super high bandwidth, all 32 megs of it.
GAF never fails to outdo its GIFs.
Now changed the faces to MS execs.
It has been weeks since he first mentioned a walkthrough.
And I was really just calling out his none sense on GAF not working for big companies, that is bullshit.
People have seen/used the PS4 UI on 'unlocked' demo kiosks.I don't understand... Sony launches sooner and there's no UI vid to speak of. And no, "Dude, I don't have that, man." doesn't count.
So in short:
++ UI - it's fast, beautiful and easy to navigate
It's a conspiracy.