Considering the average delta in 60fps is smaller than the 120fps one, it could be considered a tie. But once again, we've been hearing about those 2 extra TFs and higher memory bandwidth on chart, 'the most powerful console ever' and how XSX would perform better since March, so even a tie could be considered a win for PS5.
It was Toshiba making the Cell TV's, earliest model I saw was 2009, and it was 4K. Cell Regza it was called at the time.
Uh, one of the most important authors in the history of videogames and his collegues?
I agree with that but also Linus is really useless in moment of analize a budget product for example:
hmmm ....
www.tomsguide.com
gizmodo.com
www.destructoid.com
Look a penguin, don't hate me! 
100% the tits decide
Konami still own Kojima Productions as well.. the first one lol.
I understand that Leadbetter at DF did an amazing job in slighting the PS3 through that generation, and hence your view of the PS3's Cell processor
Hasn't he quit several times in the last couple of years after major gaffes.
Phil Spencer himself has said this is true. Its not suspicion, its fact. It was designed as a server chip and for a console, dual purpose.
A server chip for xCloud servers......
I'm guessing you believe it's because it was designed as a 'server' product.
twinfinite.net
I don´t remember how many CU but I think was the same as the Xbox one S.Here's Phil himself from 2018.
"Interestingly, he then talked about the silicon designed for the next-generation Xbox consoles."
“The thing that’s interesting for us as we roll forward, is we’re actually designing our next-gen silicon in such a way that it works great for playing games in the cloud, and also works very well for machine learning and other non-entertainment workloads. As a company like Microsoft, we can dual-purpose the silicon that we’re putting in.
We have a consumer use for that silicon, and we have enterprise use for those blades as well. It all in our space around driving down the cost to serve. Your cost to serve is made up by two things, how much was the hardware, and how much time does that hardware monetize.
So if we can monetize that hardware over more cycles in the 24 hours through game streaming and other things that need CPU and GPU in the cloud, we will drive down the cost to serve in our services. So the design as we move forward is done hand-in-hand with the Azure silicon team, and I think that creates a real competitive advantage.”
Xbox Boss Phil Spencer Explains Why He Doesn't Need to Buy EA; Talks About Next-Gen Hardware
Xbox division head Phil Spencer explains why Microsoft doesn't need to purchase EA, or make its own Fortnite. Also talks about Next-Gen hardware.
The Xbox Series X chip can run 4 Xbox One games at once.. and how many CUs does the Xbox One have?
The Xbox One has 14 CUs. And thats why the Series X has 56. To run 4 games at once. 14x4=56.
Is 52 active
But there is one thing though, series X has Rdna2 CUs but Xbox1 has GCN cus, so series X has bigger CUs than Xbox1. If xbox1 games were to run on 14 RDNA2 Cus of series X, does the performance of those games will increase or not? If not, they are leaving most of the performance of Rdna2 Cus on the table.
Shouldn't matter in these tests as the game shouldn't be CPU bound at this resolution. That's likely what he has along with his i5 box.
still invalidates the findings when using vastly different CPUs for benchmarking
I mean for clouds gaming, they are using 14 Rdna2 Cus of series X apu to run Xbox1 game right! But Rdna2 Cus are equivalent to ( about 22 Cus of xbox1 gpu), why shouldn't those games running on Series X server enjoy increased in performance?? That's what i was thinking.
I'm sure somehow they could run like One X enhanced versions (maybe?) but would anyone care/notice on a phone? Most phones are like 6" 2K screens.
Watch the whole thing (1 hour and 10min), pure comedy with Pasta!
I guess you think the ps3 was designed as a server part then as there were farms of them for psnow.Here's Phil himself from 2018.
"Interestingly, he then talked about the silicon designed for the next-generation Xbox consoles."
“The thing that’s interesting for us as we roll forward, is we’re actually designing our next-gen silicon in such a way that it works great for playing games in the cloud, and also works very well for machine learning and other non-entertainment workloads. As a company like Microsoft, we can dual-purpose the silicon that we’re putting in.
We have a consumer use for that silicon, and we have enterprise use for those blades as well. It all in our space around driving down the cost to serve. Your cost to serve is made up by two things, how much was the hardware, and how much time does that hardware monetize.
So if we can monetize that hardware over more cycles in the 24 hours through game streaming and other things that need CPU and GPU in the cloud, we will drive down the cost to serve in our services. So the design as we move forward is done hand-in-hand with the Azure silicon team, and I think that creates a real competitive advantage.”
Xbox Boss Phil Spencer Explains Why He Doesn't Need to Buy EA; Talks About Next-Gen Hardware
Xbox division head Phil Spencer explains why Microsoft doesn't need to purchase EA, or make its own Fortnite. Also talks about Next-Gen hardware.
The Xbox Series X chip can run 4 Xbox One games at once.. and how many CUs does the Xbox One have?
If the game is not CPU bound, there is no reason to believe this will influence the results in any meaningful way.
I'm not an xbox fan lol
Sure, but its not how scientific testing is done, leaving other variables undermines conclusions drawn from tested differences. The goal is to keep all other factors identical when testing to isolate one aspect.
Yet you drink the coolaid. Go figure.
Bro lol... I'm making fun of the Xbox ya idiot. I can tell you're new here.
DF is not centralized so there is no rig all testers can use and a lot of the hardware is likely private hardware.
What? DF say it themselves: their test rig for GPU benchmarking is a 10900K. They work out of an office and are part of Eurogamer, and do lots of GPU benchmarking.
www.eurogamer.net
