I did. Not sure what you seen to say such things.Watched it fully, but the difference is not big in favor to XSX in those 60Hz modes, but massively big for PS5 on 120Hz. So that is a clear win as well.
Yes. And there are moments which even series X outperformed ps5 in this mode. In the 60 FPS mode during the gameplay it stay literally above the ps5 almost the entirely time. Now we are talking of ridiculous difference but still shouldn't be ignored. Call the ps5 version of DMC5 better it's definitely a stretch. Of course we aren't not talking of statics so I take it as a grain of salt.
Even if you consider the 120 mode on XSX bugged, the PS5 is clearly more performant across the board, there is more than just 'tools' holding the Xbox back here.NXGamer's Dirt 5 comparison: PS5 x XSX
- A bug can make the game run at 45~50fps on XSX. To solve this restart the console - Texture detail, anysotropic filtering, foliage density, all lower on Series X - Resolution in Quality mode tends to hover between native 4K and 1800p on PS5, goes down to 1440p often on Series X - Reduction in...www.neogaf.com
What yous are explaining makes perfect sense if you are trying to compare PC GPU vs PC GPU. However throwing a console into the mix kinda disrupts the whole comparison doesnt it? Because essentially you are no longer comparing GPU vs GPU but system vs system? Also the resolution isnt even the same, this whole comparison is kinda dumb if you ask me.
But how does he know this? The only way to know is to do a CPU comparison in the same scene. Otherwise it's pure conjecture. We are talking about a mobile CPU at 3.5ghz VS one of the strongest CPU in the world at 5ghz.
The benchmark shows the 10900K's cores utilization. I would say that you can ignore all the virtual cores, since half the cores are basically idle. The other cores are between 20-40% utilization and this is on a PC with more overhead. The PS5's CPU should have more than enough cores and frequency to show similar performance here, so not bottleneck it's GPU in this scene.
Sure, you compare system against system; basically you always compare system against system. That's why you try to isolate the component that you want to benchmark by using a scenario where this component appears to be the bottleneck and powering up all other components to further reduce the pontential bottlenecks.What yous are explaining makes perfect sense if you are trying to compare PC GPU vs PC GPU. However throwing a console into the mix kinda disrupts the whole comparison doesnt it? Because essentially you are no longer comparing GPU vs GPU but system vs system? Also the resolution isnt even the same, this whole comparison is kinda dumb if you ask me.
Going by the recent Dirt5 analysis. We need to compare more than the FPS at the time , need to check other differences on screen like average-resolution geometry asset-quality shadows anisotropic-filtering ambient-occlusion and much more etc. So it's not just apples to apples comparisons anymore for the same game on both consoles
Sure it show it is not fully used, but in a scientific comparisons differences are called factors and to get the best possible comparison you need to change the least possible amount of factors between comparisons (prefereably only 1), in this case interactions between CPU and GPU are another factor.
That's why I said based on what I see in the DF video.
Is that area the worst case performance for PC too?
Yeah VRS makes this more challenging to do, these comparisons I mean.
Problem here is that next gen consoles have built-in hardware to perform tasks that CPU would do otherwise, even more on PS5. How can one measure how many core/threads would be necessary to replace that hardware without giving them advantage?
Its so stupid. I have zero desire to get one. But it bothers me so much. On instagram, girls dont even know what a xbox series x is. They post pictures of themselves half-naked and caption their photos “PS5 or me?”. You lose the tits, you lose the war.
I get it, good point. But i doubt that the game's audio and I/O requirements on this specific cut scene justifies the use of that much powerful CPU. A Zen 2 with similar thread count running at 10% or 20% higher frequency would be a fairer comparison in my opinion.
Amen.
Ok finished WD:L, and I give it 9/10, or even 10/10 for nailing the variety of NPC's/playable characters with impressive sense of humor and character differentiation from each.
I mostly played as an African spy sounds like the presenter here, makes everything funny with his specific sense of humor that sounds serious sometimes.
Another more elegantly spoken British spy sounds more "classy", even his sarcasm is classy. But man, can't get enough of that African spy, sounds and acts like a University professor.
Sounds are so fucking wonderful in the game, music is just crazy good and the locality is wonderful of 3D audio. Bass is so satisfying with Pulse 3D, and when entering a party you really feel like real sense of party even though overall I think the game doesn't use enough sources to make full 3D audio space, but still so satisfying. Stormzy makes it hard to get out of the car.
The story is brilliant, not dramatic, but more political and convincing.
This concept of NPC's being playable makes me so extremely cautious to not hit any of them by driving fast, something I've never ever experienced before. You might kill a friend of someone even in your clan, a wife, husband, relative, etc.
I got the game for around $41 but bought the season pass after playing it for 3-4 days. Finished most of the game now and I'll be downloading Ass Creed while finishing some very few side missions on WD:L.
See you later!
The 2nd part of that quote is interesting....
Please no.
Side note how I spent my day.....
Please no.
Side note how I spent my day.....
Good remind, Sony indeed wanted to spread Cell everywhere, I remember a tv model was going to use it, just not sure if it came to happen.
