Psycho_Mantis
Banned
No one who really does is going to answer that.
Everyone at MS reads this board, trust me.
I'm asking Reiko. Yes or No? There are so many insiders and "insiders" on this board its hard to tell who we can trust.
No one who really does is going to answer that.
Everyone at MS reads this board, trust me.
I am probably too late, but why does it not have a tilt motor? Because it is built into the console!! xD
I'm asking Reiko. Yes or No? There are so many insiders and "insiders" on this board its hard to tell who we can trust.
Yea MS's stock is at a 5 year high because for the 5 previous years it was stagnant! Steve Ballmer is an incredibly old school/dinosaur of a CEO which is why MS isn't doing well in their new ventures, they're too slow to adapt and Ballmer still acts like they're in the 90s in terms of his style. But as long as they have Windows, Server, and Office they can afford to throw money away until they rub out a "win". But they'll never be market leaders in any venture they attempt with Ballmer at the helm. The best they can do is bundle their new ventures in with Xbox...
I'll have to disagree with Windows Phone being a "major" competitor. They got what? 3.8% of the market replacing RIM...err Blackberry as number 3 and knocking them down to 2.8%..a hallow victory if there ever was one. The sad thing is MS should have been ruling the phone market. Ballmer dismissed it as an emerging market and now they're playing catchup/third fiddle to Google and Apple. He was then again late to the tablet market dismissing it the iPad saying Windows 7 is a great tablet OS...
Saying that MS has never traditionally done well with new ventures isn't a legitimiate excuse, sugar coating what I've been saying, Ballmer isn't a great CEO. You could put any of the people in this thread in charge of MS and unless they're complete idiots and destroy Windows, Server, Office, MS will make money. But like Dubai, MS needs to start attacking these emerging markets instead of waiting until years later to try and jump in.
Short answer: No
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
He's merely talking about the newest posted "specs" that were posted on pastebin on the 14th, and as a results wants the rest of you to temper or raise expectations because they could turn out to be real. But at the same time doesn't really want you to think he's the one propagating this hope or is the center of this.
goodmorningggg!
Anyone?
It's sad because you are heavily invested in MS and perceive these "bad pieces of info" more than another person. I'm looking at the big picture. We have multiple rumors of Durango trying to be the central box in the living room with DVR and possibly teaming up with cable companies to provide a set-top box experience like Roku. Add that with the talks of integration with the Win 8 ecosystem and interconnectivity between different systems and functionality with Kinect and you can see where this is going. MS's ambition is a wider scope then just games right now. Of course they'll have games. They don't want to alienate their fanbase at the beginning of a new generation so they will give them games to placate the core while they work on what they plan to really do with Durango and that's control the living room. As for Sony, I haven't heard any rumors of Sony trying to replace your cable box have you?
Sarcasm aside, I still feel the same. MS is going to give games because they want to keep the interest of the core until they get to a point where they can do what they really want with Durango.
Short answer: No
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
He's merely talking about the newest posted "specs" that were posted on pastebin on the 14th, and as a results wants the rest of you to temper or raise expectations because they could turn out to be real. But at the same time doesn't really want you to think he's the one propagating this hope or is the center of this.
Wider field of view = no tilt motor needed.
goodmorningggg!
Any smartphone owner in the WORLD who is also a gamer, should not give a Baker's fuck about whether a console primarily "focuses" on gaming.
Because your phone sure as fuck doesn't "focus" on making phone calls anymore.
ciao
how is going here ...reiko gone crazy?
Satchel said:I need all of you to gather around me. Cross your fingers, and PRAY the Surface team is behind the hardware.
Come on fuckers. Pray.
Different teams of people probably know different things about the development of the new Xbox, including specs and software. Any leak would be easily traced back to the offender and they'd get sacked and shitlisted.
That's one scenario anyway, lol.
okay, but only because you asked nicelyI need all of you to gather around me. Cross your fingers, and PRAY the Surface team is behind the hardware.
Come on fuckers. Pray.
Any smartphone owner in the WORLD who is also a gamer, should not give a Baker's fuck about whether a console primarily "focuses" on gaming.
Because your phone sure as fuck doesn't "focus" on making phone calls anymore.
Cheers. You're up pretty early, must have gone rather easy on those gin tonics last night![]()
used too
3 gin tonics and 2 chupitos ( u call chupito the little drinks? ..the shoots boh)
I need all of you to gather around me. Cross your fingers, and PRAY the Surface team is behind the hardware.
Come on fuckers. Pray.
Yeah, I want the game pad to have a stand thingy that goes "click" just because.I need all of you to gather around me. Cross your fingers, and PRAY the Surface team is behind the hardware.
Come on fuckers. Pray.
But didn't kidbeta tell us that the hardware is fixed since a long time and that nothing could be changed? Where is the risk to release the specs then?![]()
That's like... an entrée!
I need all of you to gather around me. Cross your fingers, and PRAY the Surface team is behind the hardware.
Come on fuckers. Pray.
How long do you think it takes to make a APU.
I said its been fixed for a while because of the testing and validation it has to go through but some people seem to think this doesnt matter :/
How long do you think it takes to make a APU.
I said its been fixed for a while because of the testing and validation it has to go through but some people seem to think this doesnt matter :/
Bad analogy. Nobody buys a smartphone primarily for the phone, as there are far cheaper dumb phones that do that just as well, if not better. Heck, most people don't even check how good the call quality is on a smartphone before they buy it.
By contrast, gamers buy a new console specifically for enhanced games compared to older consoles. Anything else is icing on the cake.
Lol he runs wild because there's no real consequence obviously. He dangles that spec bump over our heads like he actually knows it's true, but then acts like it's just him being hopeful and that we shouldn't doubt a significant spec bump is all. 20 CU's from 12 is pretty significant. He may just be doing wishful thinking, but his posts come across as he knows the truth and we just need to wait til the 21st.
I need all of you to gather around me. Cross your fingers, and PRAY the Surface team is behind the hardware.
Come on fuckers. Pray.
So bkilian just confirmed that the entire VSP = 4x CU is fake and that it means what any logical person though (identical to GCN1.0). Fun times.
I guess theres some hope for a spec bump within GCN1.0 though.
How long do you think it takes to make a APU.
I said its been fixed for a while because of the testing and validation it has to go through but some people seem to think this doesnt matter :/
he confirmed that marcberry is talking about a patent withtout understanding the paper
Vapormag controller
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
He said he's is talking crap
and marcberry's entire argument was that the VSP's are 4x as powerful
Therefore he just confirmed that its not true.
this could bkillian was the one of 7970 in devkits ...so forget about 1.2tf
really i dont wanna restart
What are you trying to say?.
devkits are always more powerful then the final machine. They have to use off the shelf parts at first after all.
What are you trying to say?.
devkits are always more powerful then the final machine. They have to use off the shelf parts at first after all.
The PS4 most likely contained a 7970 as well, so PS4 can forget about 1.8TF amirite?
And then Sony announced 8 gb of gddr5 instead of 4. Amazing, isn't it?
in my world u dont use a 7970 to emulate a 1.2 gpu...
and no theres no any logic explanation to this coz there r more close gpu that could emulate...