It makes Yamauchi even more rich on paper. Maybe he'll repeat what he did a couple years ago, sell and re-buy some stock and set up a "Q Fund" with the surplus again.Endgegner said:how exactly does Nintendo profit from being more valuable?
It makes Yamauchi even more rich on paper. Maybe he'll repeat what he did a couple years ago, sell and re-buy some stock and set up a "Q Fund" with the surplus again.Endgegner said:how exactly does Nintendo profit from being more valuable?
SovanJedi said:One probably tires of hearing the same old complaint, but it really REALLY can't be stressed how much of a free pass to market domination Sony handed the competitors with that price, not only in narrowing their own market but in giving the others room to breathe. I really do think Nintendo intentionally held back on their price announcement when they heard the PS3 price, so they could work out on making a relatively insane profit on it while still being a fraction of the cost of its biggest rival.
Why should they want to diversify? For one, they're #2 with the Wii and DS and it's typically that very move that kills most companies. Nintendo is doing great with their current line of products.Crayon Shinchan said:Talk about overvalued.
Fuckin' A, it's a game company.
... so what else are they going to diversify into?
innovative games
bluheim said:I beg to differ.
Yeah, letdown total...tahrikmili said:Still no itprintsmoney.gif ? You disappoint me GAF.
Vaandaviii said:I :lol much more at all the Wii lovers who get more fun talking about nintendo figures than playing wii games.
Casuals, mothers and girlfriends = make money, fans = defend, spread and bore. Mission Accomplished.
ethelred said:I hear they've got their eye on the hanafuda market.
karasu said:How are they the most valuable? What does this mean? The Wii is selling amazing well, but at the same time there haven't been THAT many Wii's sold. I mean it's not past the ps2 or anything.
DemDereNads said:Thought this was pretty damn impressive for a game company, but then I saw... number 2 use to be Canon? eh?
Both Nintendo Canon are greater than something like Honda? Or is Honda not officially a "Japanese" company?
Btw, Nintendo get off your asses with your new success and do something cool with it instead of boasting about it.
karasu said:How are they the most valuable? What does this mean? The Wii is selling amazing well, but at the same time there haven't been THAT many Wii's sold. I mean it's not past the ps2 or anything.
karasu said:How are they the most valuable? What does this mean? The Wii is selling amazing well, but at the same time there haven't been THAT many Wii's sold. I mean it's not past the ps2 or anything.
Honda probably has more real assets than Nintendo and Canon combined, but the "value" being measured here is market capitalization, which fluctuates on a everyday basis with the stock price. Just like during the dotcom boom when Cisco was valued at over $500 billion (the largest company in the world in market cap at that time), Nintendo is a flavor of the week stock that gets pushed up a lot with hysteria. Once that dies down, share prices will fall a lot. And when that happens, it will have nothing to do with whether Nintendo is profitable or not (almost all publicly traded companies are profitable, so that's a non-issue), it will have to do with Nintendo unable to continue meeting higher and higher net income expectations from Wall Street analysts.DemDereNads said:Both Nintendo Canon are greater than something like Honda? Or is Honda not officially a "Japanese" company?
All the little pieces of Mitsubishi are accounted separately I think, and some of them are privately held. Even all together I don't know if they would top Toyota, the world's most profitable (and very near to largest) car company. GM was the largest US company for decades so it isn't odd to see a car company on top.Mithos Yggdrasill said:WHAAAAAAAT ?????????'
O_O Incredible. And the first one is Toyota. What ? Better then Mitsubishi ????
Stele said:Honda probably has more real assets than Nintendo and Canon combined, but the "value" being measured here is market capitalization, which fluctuates on a everyday basis with the stock price. Just like during the dotcom boom when Cisco was valued at over $500 billion (the largest company in the world in market cap at that time), Nintendo is a flavor of the week stock that gets pushed up a lot with hysteria. Once that dies down, share prices will fall a lot. And when that happens, it will have nothing to do with whether Nintendo is profitable or not (almost all publicly traded companies are profitable, so that's a non-issue), it will have to do with Nintendo unable to continue meeting higher and higher net income expectations from Wall Street analysts.
Crayon Shinchan said:Talk about overvalued.
Fuckin' A, it's a game company.
... so what else are they going to diversify into?
DS changed everything, rise to heaven and all that.JoshuaJSlone said:I think you give too little credit to their first 115 years.
Well executed :loldrohne said:remember when japan was a world-class economic power and a center of technological innovation
now their second most valuable company is a producer of cut-rate hardware and software bearing some distant resemblance to video games
sad to see
103rd issue of Nintendo Power has a chart.Great Rumbler said:Does anyone know where I can find the chart that shows profits for Nintendo, Microsoft, and Sony over the past six years?
tahrikmili said:Affordable crap for the masses?
Neomoto said:It's amazing that Nintendo is still rising so high in such a fast pace.
Funny how people here say things like "how about releasing some actual games!" and such. I don't know guys.. I see them releasing one of, if not their biggest holiday line-up in more than a fucking decade. It's incredible, so many new installments of their biggest franchises all coming in such a relatively short period of time. How can you possible expect more from a first party output standpoint? Seriously, and we don't have much information on 2008 line-up but we don't know that too for DS. That doesn't mean that they won't release good stuff.. both platforms are market leaders.
Shares in Nintendo were up 2.6 percent at 58,900 yen in afternoon trade on Tuesday, bringing its market value to 8.34 trillion yen ($72.6 billion), surpassing Canon's market capitalisation of 8.20 trillion yen.
Life is like a hurricane,
Here in,
Duckburg.
tahrikmili said:Affordable crap for the masses?
Oh COME on :lol :loldrohne said:it's difficult to feel much patriotism as an american -- america having become some noxious cocktail of obesity, ignorance, and military aggression
but when i compare the xbox 360 and halo 3 to the wii and whatever garbage nintendo is pushing these days -- i think i feel a certain stirring in my breast -- a stirring not wholly unpatriotic
plus i've been watching 'the war,' which hits patriotism buttons i didn't know i had
we'll beat back the nintendo menace yet -- halo 3 will be like the pivotal american victories at midway and guadalcanal, so powerfully depicted by burns and co.
off to attend midnight launch. i'm wearing red and blue. and there's this ugly white hoodie i've got half a mind to put on.
drohne said:it's difficult to feel much patriotism as an american -- america having become some noxious cocktail of obesity, ignorance, and military aggression
but when i compare the xbox 360 and halo 3 to the wii and whatever garbage nintendo is pushing these days -- i think i feel a certain stirring in my breast -- a stirring not wholly unpatriotic
plus i've been watching 'the war,' which hits patriotism buttons i didn't know i had
we'll beat back the nintendo menace yet -- halo 3 will be like the pivotal american victories at midway and guadalcanal, so powerfully depicted by burns and co.
off to attend midnight launch. i'm wearing red and blue. and there's this ugly white hoodie i've got half a mind to put on.
This doesn't account for third party releases, but Nintendo is publishing more games for Wii than they were for GCN, even if you exclude the ones that most frequently get shit for being nongames, kiddy games, or minigame fests.Endgegner said:It's amazing that the "hardest of the hardcore" actually believe more in Nintendo pr than they look on the actual release lists.
JoshuaJSlone said:This doesn't account for third party releases, but Nintendo is publishing more games for Wii than they were for GCN, even if you exclude the ones that most frequently get shit for being nongames, kiddy games, or minigame fests.
True. It's more a defense to "Nintendo has shifted focus to nongames." and is somewhat misused against "Nintendo should make more games."ethelred said:That defense only holds water if people didn't also say that Nintendo needed to make more games for the stillborn GameCube. But... they did! And it's just as true now as it was then: the company needs to be delivering more games.
I would even go as far as :lolHaunted One said:
Can I ask the logic in this?SomeDude said:Meh, It should be Sony.
ethelred said:That defense only holds water if people didn't also say that Nintendo needed to make more games for the stillborn GameCube. But... they did! And it's just as true now as it was then: the company needs to be delivering more games.
JoshuaJSlone said:True. It's more a defense to "Nintendo has shifted focus to nongames." and is somewhat misused against "Nintendo should make more games."
CTLance said:So they're damned if they do, and damned if they don't. At least that's the way I see it.
Toyota doesn't make TVs.vilmer_ said:I can't wait to pick up a nice new shiny Nintendo 1080p HDTV!
An unknown future is not a counterpoint to past and present.ethelred said:Until Nintendo presents a more compelling 2008 lineup beyond Wii Fit, Mario Kart, nothing at all for the DS, and the canceled Project Hammer, that criticism, too, seems perfectly valid.
If gamers are to be expected to far and wide agree that Nintendo is continuing to make game development a priority, then Nintendo can, by all means, try being a little bit more forthcoming than Pravda.
The worth of their stock has little to do with the human and monetary resources they employ relative to Sony and MS.Pope Benedict XVI said:If Nintendo is more valuable than Sony, then they must be waaaaay more valuable than SCEI which is just one part of Sony. Presumably Nintendo also dwarfs the xbox division of MS in terms of resources. I mean MS doesn't make all of its cash available to the xbox division by any means, and by all accounts that division is under pressure to stop asking for cash from MS. It's weird to think about that because I tend to see Nintendo as this plucky underdog going up against the big boys.
JoshuaJSlone said:An unknown future is not a counterpoint to past and present.
ethelred said:Yes, actually, it is. You want to refute the criticism that Nintendo is shifting away from game development? That's an active process -- the only way to make such a refutation is to point to solid, consistent, ongoing support for gamer-oriented software. That can't be done because Nintendo steadfastly refuses to present such a lineup.
Without evidence one way or the other, people can think whatever they like.
Pureauthor said:I haven't been paying too much attention to the actual lineups, but I've heard people throwing the exact same accusation of a seemingly empty 2008 at Microsoft - and the reason Sony doesn't get accused of the same thing is because all their big 2008 games were announced who knows how long ago like MGS4 and FFXIII.