WHY ISN'T IT GODDESS OF WAR GODDESSDAMMIT?????
Kratos is an actual character though. Link is a blank slate in every game where he's playable.
WHY ISN'T IT GODDESS OF WAR GODDESSDAMMIT?????
I've played through Wind Waker. He's shown to be dozing off for one scene but nothing about that game would imply he's lazy.Link does go through character arcs and you can tell what they are thinking based on how they react to situations.
Take Wind Waker for example. Link starts as a lazy islander who reluctantly sets out with pirates to rescue his kidnapped sister. He's not very courageous and shows a lot of fear; moving forward because of family love. Over a long journey he builds up his courage and finally rescues his sister; and in a turning point for his character he continues onward beyond his personal quest and decides to be the hero of the world. He fails. This Link has no connection to the Hero of Time. He isn't born with the triforce or a mark of destiny. Unlike other heroes he has to earn his status as the hero and become acknowledged by the gods. The Link that defeats Ganon is very different from the lazy islander he started as.
Sure you can name him, but not in the FS games or HW, and no one seemed to notice or care which is pretty telling as to how much that feature really matters.You can name him BUTTMAN if you want to, come on. Zelda has always straddled the line between a vaguely established character and light player customization.
Because he reincarnates or whatever, ignoring though that even if he does he's still stayed basically the same in everything from looks to his voice. So it's brand vs lore.why does everybody wants a female link? for me Link is his own character, for me, if they wanted to let you use a female character they could have made some other characters playable, heck I would like to have more of Impa, so far, she is my favorite character in HW
That's what he started out as, but over time they started giving him his own personality, backstories, relatives, romance implications etc. Which is why I wish that they would fully commit and finally give him dialogue.I could've really, really sworn that that's exactly what Link is supposed to be. I dunno.
this thread is a bunch of nonsense.
it's this stupid politically correctness gone mad, and everyone's just arguing for the sake of arguing. what rubbish.
the 3 heroes in this game are male because they're male. that's it.
there's no hidden meaning in it. nintendo aren't trying to make any political statements with it. they don't have anything against females in their company. there's no hidden agenda here. it's a non-issue.
the 3 characters are simply male, because they are, and nintendo didn't think there would be any issue with it because really, there is no issue with it.
just a bunch of bored idiots making a mountain out of a molehill.
there are multiple games nintendo has made that feature strong lead female characters.
and the best thing about the scenarios when nintendo creates strong female characters is that it isn't done as some sort of response to real world politics or in order to address some gender equality issue it's done simply because they wanted to make another lead female character in their game and it suited it.
which imo is a much better ethos than seeing a bunch of studios & publishers stumbling over each other trying to create female 'leads' in order to appear politically correct & appeal to some real-world political movement. imo that's more dishonest & pandering, because the intention to create a female lead isn't from genuine desire to create it, period it's a 'pop-culture' knee-jerk reaction for the purposes of marketing and being able to be seen as 'progressive'.
The story calls for this sort of legend/prophecy where heroes will come together to help solve a problem. And in that, they are male characters. So, because the game is set with that as the story background, you cannot choose a gender; you are a male character.
Kratos is an actual character though. Link is a blank slate in every game where he's playable.
Well...Kratos is an actual character though. Link is a blank slate in every game where he's playable.
What's up with all the social justice warriors? What does it matter if you can't play as a girl? It doesn't mean that the creators imply that women can't be heroes. Does Tomb Raider and Metroid imply that only women can be heroes? Don't you think that calling a developer sexist because of one game is extremely shallow? What do you know about those individuals? It's weird really. Why would you look down on people like that?
That's what he started out as, but over time they started giving him his own personality, backstories, relatives, romance implications etc.
I've played through Wind Waker. He's shown to be dozing off for one scene but nothing about that game would imply he's lazy.
Nothing is reluctant about him leaving. One sad wave good bye to grandma isn't reluctance.
What courage is he building again? Does he look fearful trying to go meet Valoo or save Komali? Or any of the other ridiculous tasks that you have to do? To be courageous you have overcome fear. Like if he had tried refusing every time or complained about all of the stuff you're asked to do, you'd have a point.
I like Wind Waker Link. I think he is the closest that Link has ever been to a fleshed out character but this is still stretching beyond what's there.
I'll agree with you in this specific case (with the first paragraph), as the person asking it clearly doesn't seem genuine about it.Asking contrived questions just to ask them is a transparent and really bad thing.
No, not for this game but when does it end???
But the question here isn't why Link isn't female. I mean, that's what some people are debating about, but it's not related to this game, as Link isn't in multiplayer.My man.
If Nintendo don't want female Link it's ok, it's their vision. And I'm ok with that, personally I don't want to play as a female Link.
I didn't even consider asking for female Link in this one. All I saw was clothing customization. Didn't really think anything else of the game.
Because he reincarnates or whatever, ignoring though that even if he does he's still stayed basically the same in everything from looks to his voice. So it's brand vs lore.
Definitely! That's part of what made Wind Waker so great. The important thing here is that none of those characteristics could be exemplified by a female character, and it's not like each Link is a different person.Link in Wind Waker *regularly* emotes fear towards the enemies he faces. He also emotes annoyance at the stuff grandma wants him to do doesn't he? He's reluctant to even wear the hero outfit and go through that nonsense. He doesn't leave because he wanted to go off on adventures. He leaves because a giant bird took his sister and he's going to do everything he can to get her back, even if it means leaving the tiny island he has spent his entire life on for the first time.
I guess he could be going for the whole "all of the main characters are reincarnations" thing?Backstories? You mean basic non descript stuff like being a descendant of so and so, being an orphan, and having a childhood friend? Realtives? Last I checked you can have relatives in CaC games. Romance? Sure, but that's not gender specific. Even Pokemon does romance implications.
I'm surprised this is even an issue with a game like this, is every future zelda going to be plagued with "why no female lead?!". Can't people think of other ways to be progressive without having to change the gender of a well established character?.
You're right, even if their response was crappy and not sure why it's even a question.
People should demand Nintendo to come up with new IPs that have female leads.
Again, this thread isn't about asking Link to be female.I'm surprised this is even an issue with a game like this, is every future zelda going to be plagued with "why no female lead?!". Can't people think of other ways to be progressive without having to change the gender of a well established character?.
Not everything necessarily needs an explanation, but there's no such thing that could not be asked about. If people ask questions, it's good to answer.The three heroes are males, becasue they're male. That's it. No explanation needed.
No everything needs an explanation, no every game needs a gender selector.
Definitely! That's part of what made Wind Waker so great. The important thing here is that none of those characteristics could be exemplified by a female character, and it's not like each Link is a different person.
I guess he could be going for the whole "all of the main characters are reincarnations" thing?
Has it really something to do with Nintendo? They have female leads since the 80s (Metroid), not mentioning other games that have female playable characters (3/4 of Hyrule Warriors' cast, Paper Mario, 3D world and others)We're calling a developer sexist because of one game? More like 100. Can you not see the pattern with how common male heroes are compared to the amount of games that have women heroes?
But sure. What's up with the damn SJWs.
This is true. It's not Nintendo's fault, this is they way the story happened. Changing their genders would ruin the historical accuracy of the game.The three heroes are males, becasue they're male. That's it. No explanation needed.
No everything needs an explanation, no every game needs a gender selector.
More like being lazy and sleeping all the time. Ridiculous kindness, even the option to be competitive via dialogue options. And yes, even those things you said make it so that he's not a blank slate, the dude from the very first game was a blank slate. We knew absolutely nothing about him besides the fact that was a warrior. And I'd feel that like with DA2, the romance would feel cheap if every romance option was bi. I just don't agree with the blank slate thing. Link may not be a super divisive original hero, but he's certainly not *nothing.*Backstories? You mean basic non descript stuff like being a descendant of so and so, being an orphan, and having a childhood friend? Realtives? Last I checked you can have relatives in CaC games. Romance? Sure, but that's not gender specific. Even Pokemon does romance implications.
Well then that blows that argument out of the water haha.Wind Waker throws a wrench into that seeing as the game specifically states that WW Link is not a reincarnation of the hero.
Well then that blows that argument out of the water haha.
Of course none of that matters anyway because there's no four sword in this game so 2/3rds of the playable characters aren't link anyway.
Hyrule Warriors is
A) not a mainline entry in the Zelda series but a fun little non-canon distraction
And
B) NOT developed by Nintendo.
Are you really trying to argue that Samus in Other M wasn't a noticeable regression of her character? Because I'd love to see you try.
It's not a matter of political correctness or progressiveness. People just want to play as female link. That's it.
Woah, seriously?3/4 actually. Only the character you play as in single player is Link. All 3 of the multiplayer characters are not Link.
But isn't Link himself just a generic term used to describe multiple different characters that wear the same clothes? Ryu is one guy.There is no female link, that character doesn't exist.
Let me explain what I mean:
If we give Ryu a costume where he has breast and long hair would that be female Ryu? or Ryu with breast?
If we had a palette swap of Ryu with dark skin, would that be black Ryu? or blackface Ryu?
TLDR, I would rather have an actual female playable character (who is her own character) than a Link with long hair and boobs. That would be progressive imo.
This is true. It's not Nintendo's fault, this is they way the story happened. Changing their genders would ruin the historical accuracy of the game.
Actually, wasn't the entire backstory of the villain in Hyrule Warriors was that she was susceptible to becoming evil out of jealousy for Link? Because that kinda shit is ridiculous, not to mention yet another example of a character getting dark skin when she's evil. First being Tetra, who was rebellious.Neither game was developed internally by Nintendo but they both had Nintendo oversight and they both are part of Nintendo's exclusive console game library and use their IP. If Other M counts against Nintendo (it does) than Hyrule Warriors should count for Nintendo (it does).
Yes, this.There is no female link, that character doesn't exist.
Let me explain what I mean:
If we give Ryu a costume where he has breast and long hair would that be female Ryu? or Ryu with breast?
If we had a palette swap of Ryu with dark skin, would that be black Ryu? or blackface Ryu?
TLDR, I would rather have an actual female playable character (who is her own character) than a Link with long hair and boobs. That would be progressive imo.
People make a mountain out of a molehill so that maybe, MAYBE, this will be a consideration for their next Zelda/franchise. Then everyone can be happy and progress can be made. Nothing crazy about it.this thread is a bunch of nonsense.
it's this stupid politically correctness gone mad, and everyone's just arguing for the sake of arguing. what rubbish.
the 3 heroes in this game are male because they're male. that's it.
there's no hidden meaning in it. nintendo aren't trying to make any political statements with it. they don't have anything against females in their company. there's no hidden agenda here. it's a non-issue.
the 3 characters are simply male, because they are, and nintendo didn't think there would be any issue with it because really, there is no issue with it.
just a bunch of bored idiots making a mountain out of a molehill.
there are multiple games nintendo has made that feature strong lead female characters.
and the best thing about the scenarios when nintendo creates strong female characters is that it isn't done as some sort of response to real world politics or in order to address some gender equality issue it's done simply because they wanted to make another lead female character in their game and it suited it.
which imo is a much better ethos than seeing a bunch of studios & publishers stumbling over each other trying to create female 'leads' in order to appear politically correct & appeal to some real-world political movement. imo that's more dishonest & pandering, because the intention to create a female lead isn't from genuine desire to create it, period it's a 'pop-culture' knee-jerk reaction for the purposes of marketing and being able to be seen as 'progressive'.
Actually, wasn't the entire backstory of the villain in Hyrule Warriors was that she was susceptible to becoming evil out of jealousy for Link? Because that kinda shit is ridiculous, not to mention yet another example of a character getting dark skin when she's evil. First being Tetra, who was rebellious.
Yes, this.
There is no female link, that character doesn't exist.
Let me explain what I mean:
If we give Ryu a costume where he has breast and long hair would that be female Ryu? or Ryu with breast?
If we had a palette swap of Ryu with dark skin, would that be black Ryu? or blackface Ryu?
TLDR, I would rather have an actual female playable character (who is her own character) than a Link with long hair and boobs. That would be progressive imo.
So you can't play as a woman because...they...decided you can't play as a woman.
Okay...
Which enemies does he show fear to? Is it a regular enemy? Ganondorf? The big fat ghost clown? The scorpion dude? The giant plant? The worm?Link in Wind Waker *regularly* emotes fear towards the enemies he faces. He also emotes annoyance at the stuff grandma wants him to do doesn't he? He's reluctant to even wear the hero outfit and go through that nonsense. He doesn't leave because he wanted to go off on adventures. He leaves because a giant bird took his sister and he's going to do everything he can to get her back, even if it means leaving the tiny island he has spent his entire life on for the first time.
I think it's fine to argue that Link shouldn't be a female in any game, because the character is long established as a male.There is no female link, that character doesn't exist.
Let me explain what I mean:
If we give Ryu a costume where he has breast and long hair would that be female Ryu? or Ryu with breast?
If we had a palette swap of Ryu with dark skin, would that be black Ryu? or blackface Ryu?
TLDR, I would rather have an actual female playable character (who is her own character) than a Link with long hair and boobs. That would be progressive imo.
Not everything necessarily needs an explanation, but there's no such thing that could not be asked about. If people ask questions, it's good to answer.
And this answer was ridiculous.
This is always what bothers me personally about this topic. I'm all for diversity in games, but the solution shouldn't be "Let's change previously established male characters to female" but rather it should be "Let's make the next Mirror's Edge/Life is Strange/Tomb Raider etc" the former is just lazy
Just because they don't mind doesn't mean everyone else will agree with them. Also, Japan is leagues behind other nations in gender equality. What people may see as normal in society there can be seen as discriminatory in other countries.