• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Nintendo should retire Mario, Zelda and Metroid

Having no vested interest in Nintendo's continued survival, sure yes please. I've not liked any of the three franchises since SNES days so them focusing all their A teams on new stuff would lure me back I'm sure. If I cared about the well being of Nintendo going forward however, I would point out that this is an incredibly silly idea financially.
 
Seriously, though, the idea that Nintendo should retire its most consistently best selling franchise is the silliest thing, especially when the individual games are so different from each other between each release.
 
There are admittedly too many Mario games on the market, even if a large portion of them are magnificent and varied by genre. Then again, they are a safety net for Nintendo.

Zelda is definitely a different case. To me, it's like an eternal franchise. It expands and grows as it goes on through the ages. Whether divisive or not, it's a great vehicle for experimentation with both new gaming trends and "tried and true" gameplay mechanics and structure. At the rate that console Zelda games are released, I'm happy to continue supporting the franchise. Each game is far enough apart, and is relatively distinct in some way from the one before it.

Metroid doesn't need to be retired. If anything, it just needs revitalization. Metroid: Other M was a failed experiment. They really need to make another 2D game to re-establish good will within the fanbase. The fact that Zero Mission happened and yet we haven't seen another game like it since is a travesty.
 
Yes, and while they're at it, other devs should stop making Call of Duty, GTA, GT, Forza, Halo, Gears of War, The Sims, FF, BF, etc.

In fact: stop making games. Think of another way of entertainment.
 
People are so quick to dismiss anything as a rehash/more of the same, it's not just Nintendo games actually, sometimes you see that shit after a single installment.
 
I know that these IPs are considered "hardcore" by Nintendo and NeoGAF posters, but the sales of these franchises have been on a declining curve over the last ten years. Frankly, it's strange that in 2013, Nintendo is still touting these characters, and having to hold on to the tropes of these franchises (ie. Zelda dungeons, Mario rescuing Peach from Bowser, Samus recollecting her powerups) is creatively limiting. I would like to see Nintendo build a new stable of AAA franchises without relying on the crutch of these characters.

Cue, Poochie pics.

NSMBU and 3D Land were absolutely amazing.

Terrible, terrible OP.

Now, building the new franchises? Absolutely. Even reviving them like they did with Kid Icarus I'm fine with. But retiring? No way.
 
the Miiverse Zelda series just blew up and people want it retired?
KuGsj.gif


that miiverse community is amazing right now
 
Some one always makes this thread.

So let's get over with.

- all the games are great

- all the games sell bucket loads

- a bad nintendo nintendo ip game is still better than most games out there.
 
*yawn*

I want Nintendo to make more Mario, Zelda and Metroid games. You know why? Because they are fairly consistant in quality. Sure, there is always the odd release which gets discussed to death (Sunshine, Other M, the DS Zelda's etc.) but overall people want this stuff becaus they are good.

I want good games, so no
 
Nintendo Directs apparently drive half of GAF crazy.

Iwata would be sued for breach of his fiduciary duty to the shareholders if he retired Mario.
 
but the sales of these franchises have been on a declining curve over the last ten years.

Stopped reading there. Let's all join together, point at this man, and laugh at this blatant falsehood.

In terms of both sales and quality (i.e. the only things that matter) your argument fails dramatically. I get wanting new IPs, I really do, but this isn't a smart way to pave the way for them.
 
Nintendo shouldn't retire them at all.

Nintendo should fill its genre gaps itself, though - that way, silly people can have something else to distract them so they can delude themselves into thinking there was any more or less use of those IPs than there always has been since the 80s.
 
Stop looking at these IPs as characters and start looking at them as trojan horses for Nintendo to articulate its new, innovative gameplay. That's all they are -- a means to illustrate a new way to play. Ignore the green tunic, the red hats, and the spacesuit -- they're just skins.

BeautIP is only skin deep?

But you're right in many ways. As much as we like to think that new IPs sell a lot and have a lot of draw, they don't.

Also, a lot of gamers don't know what gameplay is or how to appreciate gameplay design. It's the truth. Start looking for the signs.

Anyone pick up Dillian's Rollin Western when it came out?

Anyone?

I see.
 
I must have imagined the 60 million sales for the New Super Mario Bros. series.

and how many Wiis did it actually move?

game came out in late 2009, by 2010 Wii was already in decline (nearly 20% less sales according to NPD, can't remember the other territories).

a full year in the market and the console actually sold less, what a draw, haha.
 
My head hurts; I don't even know where to begin. But it's funny that people can rationalize nonsense like this under the guise of promoting healthy and intelligent discussion.
 
Is this thread the next gen version of "With Wii Cafe, is it time for Mario and classic Nintendo franchises to evolve?" :P

There are admittedly too many Mario games on the market, even if a large portion of them are magnificent and varied by genre. Then again, they are a safety net for Nintendo.

Zelda is definitely a different case. To me, it's like an eternal franchise. It expands and grows as it goes on through the ages. Whether divisive or not, it's a great vehicle for experimentation with both new gaming trends and "tried and true" gameplay mechanics and structure. At the rate that console Zelda games are released, I'm happy to continue supporting the franchise. Each game is far enough apart, and is relatively distinct in some way from the one before it.

Metroid doesn't need to be retired. If anything, it just needs revitalization. Metroid: Other M was a failed experiment. They really need to make another 2D game to re-establish good will within the fanbase. The fact that Zero Mission happened and yet we haven't seen another game like it since is a travesty.

Totally agreed. Even if the core knows the different between the different games with the Mario imprint on it, it'd still be a good idea to slow their roll with those games so people aren't thinking Nintendo is doubling down with "rehashed" software and themes. Zelda is spaced out well enough, taking prominence when it's rolling around then going dormant while the market digests the current entry. Metroid though, it's only issue is that after Other M, they need to find a way to cut the chafe and get back to precisely what was liked about Super/Prime and building a new game from that while building back the trust in the brand.

Nintendo shouldn't retire them at all.

Nintendo should fill its genre gaps itself, though - that way, silly people can have something else to distract them so they can delude themselves into thinking there was any more or less use of those IPs than there always has been since the 80s.

Seriously, use Star Fox. Use F-Zero. Use Kirby. Use the oft forgotten sporting franchises that don't have Mushroom Kingdom members in it (1080, Wave Race, Pilotwings divorced from Mii aesthetics). Use retro stuff that can be fleshed out accordingly a la Kid Icarus Uprising and fill niches that are under served or non-existant. (Action game? Use the Murasame Castle/Takamaru IP. Need a complimentary adventure romp while the brain trust at EAD3 spends the next 3 years working up a frenzy? Get in touch with Retro and use StarTropics.)

When all else fails, advertise your newer IPs with the same kind of prominence as you would a Mario/Zelda/Metroid affair when reasonable.
 
I don't care much for those 3 franchisess either, but just buy and play some of the B-Tier stuff if you don't want Mario, Zelda, or Metroid.
 
sales of consoles based around Mario, Zelda and Metroid:

NES - 61.91 million
SNES - 49.10 million
N64 - 32.9 million
GAMECUBE - 21.74 million

sales of consoles based around WiiPlay and WiiFit:

WII - 99.38 million

Mario and company haven't been draws in years.

LOL this thread is getting good.
 
Mario getting a bit too much time in the spotlight, but as long as the quality is there, it's nothing to panic over, especially given the fact that he stars in so many genres outside of platforming. I wonder if Nintendo has it in them to make a new IP good enough to proudly stand amongst their classics. The last one they did was Pikmin and maybe Xenoblade. Mario and all are fine and I never want to stop seeing them though.
 
I don't see why people don't just ignore these games if they hate them so much.

Seriously. I have been through last gen without playing a single FPS. I didn't suffer from the alleged CoD clone overload yet I found more than enough games to play on various platforms. You don't see me crying about how the genre/trend needs to die.
 
I'm frankly amazed at how I'm being attacked, and the level of defensiveness here. I didn't insult any of these franchises, but the fact is that being beholden to these games to really drowns out not only Nintendo's other franchise efforts but also third party games that might otherwise have a chance to shine.

way to move the goal post. In your original post, you were saying sales for these franchise are in decline and games are creatively limiting which is why they are should be retired. Both points are proven false. Now it becomes to let 3rd party shine? really?

If you haven't noticed, XBox console sales aren't imploding, and the Halo franchise sells very well. So no, they shouldn't.

And Nintendo should retire Mario because Mario games sell less than Halo? I'm not sure I got your point.
 
This topic doesn't even make sense, okay retiring Mario, I can kind of understand, but I figure it'd be better to just stop making so many spin off games, or at least make them without Mario.

As for Zelda, there were only two games released last generation on the Wii, and one of them was a Gamecube port. Yes, there was Link's Crossbow training but that was only one spin off, not nearly as bad Mario.

Metroid had only one game released last generation on the Wii.

So it's not like these franchises are being whored out nearly as much as people seem to think, although you could make a case for Mario.
 
sales of consoles based around Mario, Zelda and Metroid:

NES - 61.91 million
SNES - 49.10 million
N64 - 32.9 million
GAMECUBE - 21.74 million

sales of consoles based around WiiPlay and WiiFit:

WII - 99.38 million

Mario and company haven't been draws in years.

While you make a fair point, keep in mind Mario Kart Wii is the best selling game of all time (I think) and that Mario 3, the previous best selling non-bundled game ever, was eclipsed by several Wii and DS Mario franchise titles in the last few years.

Also, Nintendo DS really started taking off after Mario Kart, New SMB, and DS Lite. (Also Animal Crossing and Brain Age, for complete fairness.)
 
We need a Metroid side-scrolling "MMO" similar to Terrarria or Minecraft. That is, randomly-generated worlds with different biomes and powerups, bosses, and so on, that people can explore freely (possibly adding in a component to create your Hunter and select an alignment and so on).

Basically, Dark Souls meets Terraria meets Borderlands meets Super Metroid.
 
While you make a fair point, keep in mind Mario Kart Wii is the best selling game of all time (I think) and that Mario 3, the previous best selling non-bundled game ever, was eclipsed by several Wii and DS Mario franchise titles in the last few years.

Also, Nintendo DS really started taking off after Mario Kart, New SMB, and DS Lite. (Also Animal Crossing and Brain Age, for complete fairness.)

I think he thinks Nintendo only makes consoles and no handheld.
 
I'd just like to see Nintendo put some development and marketing muscle behind all-new AAA franchises, the kind that get retail releases and not just eShop, and that feature a strong cast of characters in an immersive world, like Pikmin.
 
This post is extra ignorant because it's factually incorrect, Mario has sold crazy good the past 5 years.

This is not argument for franchise overmilking.

It's funny because it's cool to hate on COD because of the countless sequels and franchise milking but if Nintendo does the same, there's nothing wrong.
 
Top Bottom