They can, sureSo every planet, every bit of flora and fauna...all get named by the player base, is that correct?
Makes sense if the Bypass Chips have other uses we don't know yet. Then it becomes a matter of resource management, use the material for a chip or another itemThinking a bit about it, I think the Bypass Chips are badly designed. They should have implemented it like how you activate other terminals in the game - just demand 10 Iron and 10 Plutonium upon activation of the device, instead of forcing you to craft an item first.
Hopefully I can wife up a korvax babe and make babbies. Intergalactic father.
Makes sense if the Bypass Chips have other uses we don't know yet. Then it becomes a matter of resource management, use the material for a chip or another item
I'm assuming you can also get them as rewards or find themSure, but you can craft them at any time, so if you just keep the required materials in your inventory it will always be better than crafting the chips in advance.
Sorry, I'm having a discussion with a person regarding the game and the stream, this person claims that Hello Games lied regarding the playtime of the game when they said it'll take between 60 to 100hs to reach the center of the universe straight (that's what this journalist is saying they said, which is weird since that looks like a pretty wide estimation). As far as I know withouth knowing much of the stream, it took the streamer close to 40hs right?
Either way I'm saying that it's weird to take one random person opinion as a weapon to diminish the game and the word of the developer and even if it takes that time, devs always tend to claim they games are longer than it really is for people so is not breaking news.
Anyway, this person says that No Man's Sky deserves all the backlash is getting so my question is: Does the game is receiving any backlash? Does the streamer said if the game is good or bad to him? because honestly I haven't read any backlash yet.
Sorry, I'm having a discussion with a person regarding the game and the stream, this person claims that Hello Games lied regarding the playtime of the game when they said it'll take between 60 to 100hs to reach the center of the universe straight (that's what this journalist is saying they said, which is weird since that looks like a pretty wide estimation). As far as I know withouth knowing much of the stream, it took the streamer close to 40hs right?
Either way I'm saying that it's weird to take one random person opinion as a weapon to diminish the game and the word of the developer and even if it takes that time, devs always tend to claim they games are longer than it really is for people so is not breaking news.
Anyway, this person says that No Man's Sky deserves all the backlash is getting so my question is: Does the game is receiving any backlash? Does the streamer said if the game is good or bad to him? because honestly I haven't read any backlash yet.
I'm surprised they managed to nail 60fps on PS4... might have to get this if it reviews favourably.
Is this confirmed 60 FPS on PS4?
Not confirmed, no. Just talk of the streamers saying "it's smooth". So a stable frame rate, but not necessarily 60fps.
Sorry, I'm having a discussion with a person regarding the game and the stream, this person claims that Hello Games lied regarding the playtime of the game when they said it'll take between 60 to 100hs to reach the center of the universe straight (that's what this journalist is saying they said, which is weird since that looks like a pretty wide estimation). As far as I know withouth knowing much of the stream, it took the streamer close to 40hs right?
Either way I'm saying that it's weird to take one random person opinion as a weapon to diminish the game and the word of the developer and even if it takes that time, devs always tend to claim they games are longer than it really is for people so is not breaking news.
Anyway, this person says that No Man's Sky deserves all the backlash is getting so my question is: Does the game is receiving any backlash? Does the streamer said if the game is good or bad to him? because honestly I haven't read any backlash yet.
Interesting. I'd be fine with 30 but 60 would be icing on the cake.
Holy shit. Imagine being able to make a space farm? Mate different creatures you've captured to create new species. We spore nowHow Korvax get pragnent?
I could take one of these things.
![]()
Hmm...that may have just sold me..I could take one of these things.
![]()
Uuuuuugh... it's still the coolest looking thing, and it sucks that it probably isn't in the game anymore.
Because we haven't seen it yet(I'm assuming that's the logic going behind that otherwise idk)wait what? why isnt it in the game anymore???
Uuuuuugh... it's still the coolest looking thing, and it sucks that it probably isn't in the game anymore.
Just because it hasn't shown up in a stream doesnt mean it's not in the gameUuuuuugh... it's still the coolest looking thing, and it sucks that it probably isn't in the game anymore.
Any word on a NEO patch? I've waited so long for this game but if they are going to be putting a NEO patch out for it I might just wait another month or so and make it my launch title. What an experience that would be.
Any word on a NEO patch? I've waited so long for this game but if they are going to be putting a NEO patch out for it I might just wait another month or so and make it my launch title. What an experience that would be.
Sorry, I'm having a discussion with a person regarding the game and the stream, this person claims that Hello Games lied regarding the playtime of the game when they said it'll take between 60 to 100hs to reach the center of the universe straight (that's what this journalist is saying they said, which is weird since that looks like a pretty wide estimation). As far as I know withouth knowing much of the stream, it took the streamer close to 40hs right?
Either way I'm saying that it's weird to take one random person opinion as a weapon to diminish the game and the word of the developer and even if it takes that time, devs always tend to claim they games are longer than it really is for people so is not breaking news.
Anyway, this person says that No Man's Sky deserves all the backlash is getting so my question is: Does the game is receiving any backlash? Does the streamer said if the game is good or bad to him? because honestly I haven't read any backlash yet.
Just because it hasn't shown up in a stream doesnt mean it's not in the game
And it doesnt work like that anyway. They can't just remove an individual creature, the devs probably never found that creature ever again
I mean, they haven't even officially announced the Neo yet. House said it's real and that's it. So... no there hasn't been any word on a Neo patch for this or any other game.
wait what? why isnt it in the game anymore???
There's still seems to be a lot of missing information regarding universe vs galaxy. The streamer got to the center of a galaxy, not of the universe.
Now is there a center of the universe? Going by quotes, seems like there is.. but there hasn't been any concrete evidence otherwise, and the streamer got the platinum trophy by the time he got to the center of his first galaxy.. so it's hard to tell what's what.
They can, sure
So after a couple more days, has this been dis-proven yet??
How has the primary path to center been different for each streamer playing the game so far?
Well,only the people that find your planetsGoodness...the abundance of idiotic names alone might be enough to make me not want to play this.
Or do I only see what I name and nothing else?
Or does everyone get to see that I named each planet Richard Peckerwood 1st, Richard Peckerwood 2nd, etc...
So after a couple more days, has this been dis-proven yet??
How has the primary path to center been different for each streamer playing the game so far?
Well,only the people that find your planets
Are you asking if people are being given paths through completely different systems? Yes, of course they are.
I really don't understand where the idea that this changed came from. You will start in a random spot in the Euclid galaxy. So will I. The "path" seems to be the game just giving you the most direct route from where you are, to the center.
But is the Euclid galaxy a static galactic map that is the same for everyone? Or could everyone's galaxy just be randomly generated from a unique seed?
What kinds of events have happened on the "happy path" planets to center for players so far? Is there a main event on each one that allows them to propel forward? A discovery that gives coordinates for the next "happy path" planet?
But is the Euclid galaxy a static galactic map that is the same for everyone? Or could everyone's galaxy just be randomly generated from a unique seed?
What kinds of events have happened on the "happy path" planets to center for players so far? Is there a main event on each one that allows them to propel forward? A discovery that gives coordinates for the next "happy path" planet?
This is the part I'm more worried might be true:
![]()
...and we're not really moving towards a physical "center".
How far "out" can we zoom the galactic map? Can we view the entire circular galaxy and see our current location relevant to the center? Can we see the edge? etc
And I don't know if they ever indicated that we would have a constant marker of which planet / system to head for next on the way to center... I always imagined you could zoom out the map to view the galaxy, and it would be like:
- you are here
- center is there
- Good Luck!
There is only one seed. Every single thing in the game is already decided by the math using that seed. So the Euclid galaxy (which seems to be the name of the starting galaxy) will always be the same for everyone, but we are all so impossibly far apart that there is only a small chance we'll even see the same planets and star systems, much less actually cross paths in real time.
There is no "randomly generated" content for individual players.