tanod said:
When you think about the 25% increase due to the 5-week month as well as the typical 2x November boost that happens. It's weird to think that PS3 may sell upwards of a million consoles in December.
It is very important to keep in mind that, due to the extra week in January, direct comparison of this year's Nov/Dec to 2006's is problematic.
Days between Thanksgiving and Christmas, not including Thanksgiving or Christmas:
Nov-06: 2
Nov-07: 9
Dec-06: 29
Dec-07: 23
In short, November 2007 has a larger chunk of the pre-Christmas spending than November 2006, and, thus, December 2007 will have a smaller chunk compared to December 2006. Therefore, the
expectation should be for a smaller jump between November and December than we've seen the last few years.
speculawyer said:
But that said, the xbox 360 is where the money is for 3rd party developers.
Money in sales
and money for development.
DayShallCome said:
This was posted in the NPD thread, but
niceskybox.com has a deeper look at some of the title specific information (plus official NPD tie ratios) that were released over the weekend.
That's your blog, right? I don't think you should specify the software and hardware numbers to the level of precision that you do. "Significant digits"
PhatSaqs said:
From there it says 360 AC did 1.1 mil with the addition of 140K CEs sold.
That would be incorrect. The 980K included all editions of the game.
As a factor in the 360's flat sales for Guitar Hero III in November, Rock Band should be considered. Rock Band is heavily geared toward online co-op play. Whereas you may find someone playing the game with all the band members in one room, the more likely situation is that the band will meet up online. With Live being so prevalent with 360 owners, I feel this draw could've negatively impacted Guitar Hero III's second month on 360. PS3 also had Rock Band, but PS3's online draw is not as out-front as the 360's. Also, as your graph showed, a greater ratio of 360 owners bought Rock Band than PS3 owners, so the impact on the 360 would've been greater.
Nice analysis, as usual.