In general, I like this article a lot more than last month's.
jvm, I have criticisms and suggestion for next month's article, if you are interested in them:
1) When comparing PS3 and 360 sales, I think you should focus more on the fact that software sales are healthy on all platforms. Head-to-head comparisons only serve to insight conflict.
2) If you want to keep these types of comparisons then you may also want to look into comparing the PS3 to the 360 in 2006. It should help balance perspectives. For example, in November 06, the 360 had GoW at about 1 million, but then only 5 other games sold over 100k (4 of those being under 200k). The PS3 doesn't look so bad overall in that comparison, although 1st party comparisons will look worse.
3) Seeing how NPD has been combining SKU for the Top 10, might I suggest looking into the combined sales Pokemon and Nintendogs and other split titles. You comment that the PSP and DS have no titles in the Top 10, but I wonder if that would still be true if everything was equally combined.
4) I don't understand why you made this comment:
Super Mario Galaxy performed extremely well for its first month. If it follows in the footsteps of Super Mario Sunshine, we will be seeing Galaxy on the charts for at least two more months and given the pace of Wii sales, perhaps even longer than that.
SMG has already outsold the first several months of SMS. There is no pattern to track, no footsteps to follow. If there were, then we should expect SMG to sell 11 million lifetime in the US.
5) We need clarification about Assassin's Creeds total. If the 980k includes the Collector's Edition, then it is NOT the best selling new IP, despite what another annalist claims. Gears sold just over 1 million when you combine it regular version with the CE version in November '06.
JoshuaJSlone said:
Irrelevant in a discussion about frontloadedness. Call of Duty 4 for X360 could drop off the face of the Earth this month and be on both the "drop off releatively quickly" and "over 1m sold" lists.
The statistic itself is also unverifiable and the method used to reach that number does not consider actual sales. You could have just left it at, "Irrelevant in a discussion."