mckmas8808 said:This sir is a pure lie.
Things like this is what makes Farrakhan a horrible person.
I never said he wasn't a delusional idiot, simply that he's basically a cookie cutter congregation leader.
mckmas8808 said:This sir is a pure lie.
Things like this is what makes Farrakhan a horrible person.
CoolTrick said:So, I'm just wondering, is the Obama fan's defense on this "Despite him sitting in this church for over 20 years and voluntarily choosing to do so, he holds not iota of any of the ideals of his pastor."?
Because while I frankly don't believe Obama really does, what in the world does this say about his judgement? Twenty YEARS of listening to this. Why doesn't he do more to seperate himself from these comments, and repeatedly pound it over and over again? Why was Mitt Romney crucified for being a Mormon, but not Obama, for directly having a bigot pastor for over 20 years?
Since I'll probably now be called a racist and accusing Obama of being a bigot due to people not even reading, again, let me say I don't really think Obama agrees at all. But that doesn't excuse him for not doing more against this.
Twenty. Years.
this is not new information, he denounced this guy a long ass time ago. what are people not getting here?
If he hadn't said "God Damn America" 80% of gaf would of agreed with the pastors views.
AmishNazi said:It just a funny double standard on GAF. These types of things get said all the time about muslims and no one bats a eye and the few that do get ridiculed to no end. So it's ok to point out a country's faults as long as it's not America?
I've heard a lot of this rhetoric before. The America is reaping what it has sown from it's foreign policy has come out of black mouths, white mouths and highly educated political pundits.
Replace the third strike, drugs and building bigger prisons with abortions, turning our backs on god, and sexual freedoms and it sounds like any other baptist preacher. It's not like he's calling for the eradication of an entire religion in a country based on religious freedom. I take that he's saying that we shouldn't say god bless America when it hardly follows god's rules.
Still trying to figure out how this makes him a bigot though.
harSon said:His comments on drugs and prisons are actually spot on.
AmishNazi said:Definitely not what Jesus would do.
ComputerNerd said:Although Obama probably doesn't share all the views of his pastor, if I were him, I'd have switched churches long ago.
I couldn't bring myself to listen to crap like that for a few hours a week. Something's strange when you're willing to listen to hate speech a few hours a week, and never think to change churches.
CoolTrick said:Twenty Years.
"Oh, yeah, I don't agree."
Nope, sorry. I'm sorry that you Obama fans won't hold a presidential candidate to a higher standard than just needing THAT.
ComputerNerd said:Although Obama probably doesn't share all the views of his pastor, if I were him, I'd have switched churches long ago.
I couldn't bring myself to listen to crap like that for a few hours a week. Something's strange when you're willing to listen to hate speech a few hours a week, and never think to change churches.
Yes it's so horrible we nuked them instead of going into a land war with potentially millions of casualties on both sides.icarus-daedelus said:This needs to be said more, dammit, MOAR. Well, maybe not the part about NY and the Pentagon, that is uncalled for and unrelated, but pointing out the hypocrisy of our attitudes towards other countries (especially their nuclear policies) when we nuked hundreds of thousands of innocent Japanese civilians cause Truman didn't wanna drag out the war... this has always, always rubbed me the wrong way, and it's nice to see it brought into the conversation every once in a while.
The problem is, this guy is saying things that I think are valid opinions... and then he drags 9/11 into it. And as far as I can tell from that article, Obama disagrees with his views on 9/11, so I'm not sure how this is a megaton.
Branduil said:Yes it's so horrible we nuked them instead of going into a land war with potentially millions of casualties on both sides.
harSon said:I was watching a documentary a week or so ago on the building of massive prisons. They're basically being built in rural towns to compensate for dried up oil reserves. And those cities have 90+ % conviction rates, most of which are Blacks, to fill these prisons. Pretty disgusting stuff.
I don't think you understand what the Japanese mindset towards surrender was.Atrus said:Dropping 2 atomic bombs onto the civilian populace of a nation which has depleted it's military and strategic resources was unnecessary. The bombs were nothing but the flexing of military power that could have been easily replaced with offshore bombardment or air strikes onto strategic targets.
It would have taken longer, but it would have at least saved the civilian populace the fallout from atomic weaponry.
mckmas8808 said:People have to commit crimes in order for them to need to build more. Us blacks need to stop committing so many crimes.
Branduil said:I don't think you understand what the Japanese mindset towards surrender was.
harSon said:Do some research buddy.
Because of idiots who don't understand basic military tactics?mckmas8808 said:I don't understand how you think it was a good idea. You are the main reason why people overseas hate us Americans.
'F' it lets just bomb and kill 10,000s of innocent people in order to save 1,000,000 US military lives.
The way I look at it, if you signed up to be in the military it should be you the one dying. Not innocent people from other nations. They should have land war it up.
Gen. George S. Patton said:The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
Jtrizzy said:Didn't you guys know that the government created crack and AIDS and put them into black communities to kill them? If not maybe you should attend this man's sermons.
This man married Obama and his wife. Would any of you allow this man to marry you and your spouse?
mckmas8808 said:I'm curious. What are you getting at? Because I've heard plenty of black people being pissed off about the growing rate of prisons being built. Hell I hate the high number of prisons being built.
But I have a feeling I hate it for another reason. What's your reason?
Branduil said:Because of idiots who don't understand basic military tactics?
CoolTrick said:Ugh, so of course, the thread will get derailed into the raving lunatic's actual arguments instead of Obama's link with this guy.
Wasn't I chastised by Amir0x for going slightly off topic in one of these threads? The Debate Thread, wasn't it?
mckmas8808 said:But what if we do what General Patton says, but kill 200,000 innocent people in the process?
What if we don't do it and a million civilians die, as well as hundreds of thousands more soldiers?mckmas8808 said:But what if we do what General Patton says, but kill 200,000 innocent people in the process?
harSon said:The fact that these prisons are being built for profit and slave labor in cities with dried up oil reserves. These areas are known to target minorities and have ridiculous conviction rates that are often well over 90%. The fact that are broken prison system no longer seeks to rehabilitate inmates but instead over crowd them for reasons listed above. Taking non-violent criminals and cultivating them into violent people because of our incompetent drug laws and co-ed prisons (Sending Violent and Non-Violent criminals to the same prison).
CoolTrick said:Ugh, so of course, the thread will get derailed into the raving lunatic's actual arguments instead of Obama's link with this guy.
Wasn't I chastised by Amir0x for going slightly off topic in one of these threads? The Debate Thread, wasn't it?
CoolTrick said:Ugh, so of course, the thread will get derailed into the raving lunatic's actual arguments instead of Obama's link with this guy.
Wasn't I chastised by Amir0x for going slightly off topic in one of these threads? The Debate Thread, wasn't it?
Branduil said:What if we don't do it and a million civilians die, as well as hundreds of thousands more soldiers?
You were the one that called the preacher a bigot. We're merely pointing out that really these discussions have been around for a long time and aren't really that bigoted.
Branduil said:I don't think you understand what the Japanese mindset towards surrender was.
Atrus said:I do. However, you don't realize that the immediate impact of the atomic bombs was by and large no different than the continuing firebombing of Japanese cities by more conventional methods.
In testimonies from survivors, nobody even realized that it was a new weapon and it was initially treated as another firebombing strike. What was different however was that this was not only the first occasion an atomic device was used, but also the first occasion it was used on a civilian populace. The effect of atomic fallout wasn't even tested at that time since the atom bomb was newly developed, and was only made known after the Japanese victims were documented.
The war would have been won just as easily without having to bloody the hands with this senseless atrocity, and US military commanders rejected the notion that the atom bomb was required. Part of the hesitation on the Japanese was that they wanted their over-glorified emperor sitting on the throne and the US counter-response to that was to keep leveling cities until unconditional surrender was achieved.
This myth that the Japanese are all die-hard suicidal people is a false one. No civilization has ever had all its members drink the kool-aid, Bushido code or no. So long as you keep on killing the head of any country, you'll find someone willing to surrender to keep both the power and their life. This wasn't even needed in Japan since the government switched from Koiso to the pro-surrender coalition of Kantaro Suzuki back in April of that year, months before the atom bombs were dropped.