RainbowL33T
Member
And in other news,Bourdais got his fourth consecutive champ car championship.Not bad at all.I hope he can do well in F1 next year.
Burai said:They won't disqualify the drivers. It would make a complete mockery of the championship.
I'm expecting constructors points for the race removed and a hefty fine for each team.
skybaby said:What I posted is still not confirmed as official. One of the marshals is Portuguese, and he leaked the news to Portuguese press. Still going as unofficial. It started as saying they would lose points but places remained, then no penalties at all.
iapetus said:Not disqualifying the drivers also makes a complete mockery of the championship. It's okay to get points by cheating if to lose those points would improve another driver's standing? Frankly I wish they'd just covered the whole thing up and let the result quietly stand (that would obviously have made a complete mockery of the championship too, but at least nobody would have noticed...)
Bizarre that such a good season from the point of view of racing has been such a joke from the point of view of results - both the constructors and drivers championships finally decided by the FIA not the on-track activity.
reilo said:The race in itself was decided on the track. Lewis fucked up. Alonso could not defend his title. Everything that has happened in the previous races did not matter and the championship was decided by the last race - and the best driver took it.
:lol Gotta love The Sungodhandiscen said:"The Sun" is a load of garbage. "At least Alonso didn't win" :lol
godhandiscen said:"The Sun" is a load of garbage.
Shinobi said::lol Peter Windsor just called into Wind Tunnel, saying McLaren is going to appeal. :lol
Man, calm down. They said they were below temperature, but they did not say what argument the teams used for not getting a penalty. If the facts they presented prove its not their fault, then so be it, even if they were outside regulations. I'm sure we will hear more during the week.iapetus said:Except it ultimately came down to a decision by the FIA that would determine what the final result was. Once you've got that situation where the three drivers were found to have breached the rules, whether you decide to strip them of their championship points or not is a decision that determines who wins the championship. Sure, Lewis could have not made a stupid mistake and could have won the championship in his own right, and that's why I'd have been perfectly happy if none of these fuel irregularities had come to light and Raikonnen had won in a purely on-the-track decision. The fact that everything has been determined by decisions by the ruling body leaves a bad taste in the mouth after this season, though - which shouldn't be the case, because in a lot of other ways it's been a great season.
If the FIA has any plans of being consistent, by the way, this ruling means that teams can now use colder fuel than the rules permit without fear of being penalised. Hands up everyone who thinks that'll actually be the case next season. No, me neither.
Fernando Alonso says he will hang his head in shame for the sport if Lewis Hamilton is named champion
Doubt remains about the result as the FIA launched an investigation into irregularly cold petrol used by the two BMW and a Williams car which all finished ahead of Lewis Hamilton.
Cooler fuel means it can be loaded into the car at a greater rate and being denser, is also said to give improved performance for several laps. If the FIA had disqualified them, then Lewis Hamilton would be World Champion, moving up from 7th to 4th in the Brazilian race.
Finally the stewards decided not to punish the three drivers, and the current result stands – Kimi Raikkonen is World Champion.
However now McLaren Mercedes say they will appeal, and so things remain in doubt.
Fernando Alonso is reported this morning as commenting that it would be shameful if Hamilton is named winner because of this. He told the Cadena Ser radio station that his face ‘would fall in shame for the sport’ if it happened.
The ex World Champion commented that Raikkonen was a ‘just champion’.
‘If you have more points you are the Champion, as in football’, he said. He has won six races and Hamilton and I four’.
Yup, Lewis must not win it this way. He would become a symbol of everything that is wrong with the sport. Best let him win next year instead.Shinobi said:
skybaby said:Man, calm down. They said they were below temperature, but they did not say what argument the teams used for not getting a penalty. If the facts they presented prove its not their fault, then so be it, even if they were outside regulations. I'm sure we will hear more during the week.
Not everything is black and white you know. Not getting a penalty does not equal to the FIA letting them go and allowing rules to be broken.
skybaby said:Edit: it's really amazing the complains of Mclaren's supporters here when the team was convicted of stealing other teams plans and all they got was a "fine" and didn't lose any driver's points when they obviously benefited from it. Quite hypocritical IMO.
You obviously have not read the full report, just the filtered parts through the British press. But I'm not going to go back to that, instead let's list how many times Hamilton was benefited from the FIA "fairness":iapetus said:And for the record, I missed the part where McLaren were shown to have benefitted from Ferrari's plans. The definitive evidence that got them convicted for having the details of the plans known through the team was an incident in which the plans turned out not to be of any use to them because of the fundamentally different design of the cars.
iapetus said:And for the record, I missed the part where McLaren were shown to have benefitted from Ferrari's plans.
skybaby said:You obviously have not read the full report, just the filtered parts through the British press. But I'm not going to go back to that, instead let's list how many times Hamilton was benefited from the FIA "fairness":
- Monaco: Hamilton complains Mclaren favored Alonso in the race strategy. Investigation is opened, but nothing happened.
- USA: The other way around, Alonso complains to the Stewards that Mclaren is favoring Hamilton, no investigation opened.
- Nürburgring: Hamilton is lifted back into track. Everyone else? Tough luck. FIA later says "please don't let that happen again".
- Hungary: Alonso loses his pole position as he delays his pit exit, thus slowing down Hamilton. But before that, Hamilton disrespected a team order to let Alonso drive past him on the track.
- Italy: Hamilton cuts a chicane to overtake Massa and doesn't even go under investigation.
- Japan: Hamilton brake-checks less than 5 meters from the safety car, causing an accident between 2nd and 3rd placed cars. No investigation the same day or the following week after investigation was opened. (Alonso was punished with 10 grid positions last year in Hungary for brake-checking a back runner in a friday pratice, under dry conditions, and no accidents resulted from it). Kubica is punished instantly for touching Hamilton, in a clear race incident.
- Brazil: Hamilton uses an extra set of wet tires, but only the team is fined. During qualifying, stays in front of Kimi's fast lap and once again, nothing happens.
Oh it has always been like this, don't worry. Ever heard of Jean-Marie Balestre?Ghost said:*sigh* F1 is such a colossal joke of a sport.
The whole of the FIA just needs to quit and let some people who aren't totally under the thumb of the top teams take over.
But they wont because they all seem to be as arrogant as they corrupt.
After Moseley goes, next in line for the presidency is John Todt... once he's at the helm we'll probably look back at 2007 as a golden age of fair play.Ghost said:The whole of the FIA just needs to quit and let some people who aren't totally corrupt and/or life long friends/enemies with the team bosses.
Your memory must be letting you down, McLaren didn't steal a thing.skybaby said:Edit: it's really amazing the complains of Mclaren's supporters here when the team was convicted of stealing other teams plans and all they got was a "fine" and didn't lose any driver's points when they obviously benefited from it. Quite hypocritical IMO.
I think we can all agree on this.MrSardonic said:And yes, at least that cunt Alonso didn't win.
Kroole said:Well they did get Ferrari's floor banned thanks to the info they got from Stepney. A move which definitely helped McLaren gain a head start vs Ferrari.
skybaby said:You obviously have not read the full report, just the filtered parts through the British press. But I'm not going to go back to that
JonathanEx said:I think everyone who isn't braindead can agree on this.
tetsuoxb said:Fixed again.
megateto said:Fixed.JonathanEx said:I think everyone can agree on this.
megateto said:Braindead? Please, be nice and let have people their own opinion, without going into not so nice comments, would you?
tetsuoxb said:Ironic, considering you go around editing the opinions of others.
But I would expect nothing less than this kind of whining from an Alonso fan.
Ghost said:*sigh* F1 is such a colossal joke of a sport. The governing body is a disgrace, they've totally failed to create any kind of consistant competitive sport on the track, so they just manipulate the rules to create whichever situation gives them the most money!
The whole of the FIA just needs to quit and let some people who aren't totally corrupt and/or life long friends/enemies with the team bosses.
But they wont because they all seem to be as arrogant as they corrupt.
iapetus said:This is true, but the floor was illegal, so it's hardly a bad thing.
Just a tiny bit of the report for you:iapetus said:That's alright, it's fine for you to admit you don't have a leg to stand on.
What reports, you ask?WMSC Transcript said:Nigel TOZZI: Rather than playing lawyers games, let me raise the question. The e-mail is in the FIA dossier, behind Tab 5, on page 46. Mr Lowe, in that e-mail, in the second paragraph, you say: By the way, we are now certain that the lever in their car is for brake-balance. Mr Lowe, certainty is a very high test. One way to reach it is from a source you know to be impeccable, such as Mr Stepney.
Patrick LOWE: That is a correct observation, hypothetically.
Nigel TOZZI: As I understand it, you say that this was not the basis for your certainty, but rather it was reports which you received.
Patrick LOWE: It was partly from reports, and partly from an assessment which we made. Analysis of the situation shows that there are no other things that this could possibly be. That is the principal reason for the certainty. There are so few things possible within the regulations. That was our feeling, but we applied some rigour to that thinking. As I explained in my statement, a number of us brainstormed and came to that conclusion.
Is March too late for they to change their braking system for the season? Jonathan Neale, Managing Director, disagrees:Page 6 the WMSC Decision of 130907 said:3.18
On 12 April 2007 at 12.25 Mr. de la Rosa wrote to Mr. Coughlan and asked can you explain me as much as you can, Ferraris braking system with the [reference to detailed technical information]? Are they adjusting from inside the cockpit ?
3.19
After a number of exchanges about whether a description would be too complicated to articulate by e-mail, Mr. Coughlan replies on 14 April 2007 at 14.40 with a technical description which purports to be a description of the principles underpinning the Ferrari braking system. Ferrari have confirmed that the description given is an accurate (though incomplete) description of the principles of its braking system. Coughlan concludes with a statement that we are looking at something similar. This latter statement strongly suggests that the McLaren system was being worked on from a position of knowledge of the details of the Ferrari system, which, even if the Ferrari system not being directly copied, must be more advantageous to McLaren than designing a system without such knowledge.
3.20
The e-mail exchange between Mr. de la Rosa and Mr. Alonso dated 25 March 2007 at 01.43 also describes some aspects of the McLaren braking system and states that with the information that we have, we believe Ferrari has a similar system and goes on to describe highly specific elements of the Ferrari system (which cannot be set out here for confidentiality reasons but which clearly demonstrate knowledge of Ferraris confidential information).
There isnt much on the car that stays the same; maybe the seatbelts dont change. From the moment the car is formed in January to the last race in October, we make an engineering change on average every twenty minutes.
The rules also say you must stay more than 5 meters from the safety car. It goes both ways you know.mrklaw said:stop railing on Iapetus. He's one of the sanest people in this thread right now.
So we shouldn't let the BMW drivers be penalised becasue that might not let Kimi win? But if it really did give them a 5-10BHP boost, isn't it possible that Hamilton could have fought back to the necessary 5th place, but was prevented from doing that partly because of the unfair performance of the cars in front of him?
So how would that make it 'fair' that Kimi wins?
I agree neither outcome is ideal. There are too many rule and regulations these days. Perhaps all rules need an associated penalty. It seems the rules are clear but the penalty for breaking one is down to too much interpretation by the FIA. If it clearly said (for example), that exceeding the fuel temperature limits will result in disqualification, or a penalty of 3 places in the race, or starting on the back of the grid in the next race - it doesnt' matter. Whats needed is clarity.