Oh... My... God! Netflix pays 100 Million to keep Friends.

Oct 23, 2016
2,894
3,071
505
#1
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/04/business/media/netflix-friends.html

Netflix had announced they were going on a break from Friends starting in 2019. After hearing feedback from consumers, they decided to pay 100 Million to renew.

Previous price to stream the show... 30 Million.

Netflix message to their customers “I’ll be there for you. Cuz your there for me too”.
 
Jan 14, 2018
713
512
275
#7
Last edited:
Feb 3, 2018
2,654
2,529
360
32
USA
#14
Yes. They all had back end deals im pretty sure

I think the office will be worth more when Netflix tries to remove it.
I cant imagine what its like to be syndicated, then when that's about to dry up along comes digital media!

They must be schwimming in the money.
 
Last edited:
Dec 18, 2013
913
576
355
#21
Is this show even worth keeping? I mean obviously it must do outstanding numbers for them to pay that. I’m surprised they don’t have a “random episode of friends” line in my Netflix.

But I just never found it funny or engaging. Not sure why people like this more then some other funnier sitcoms.
 
Mar 6, 2018
1,210
1,313
265
#25
Why isn't there a streaming service that says "you give us your show, we can cancel your contract at anytime after a year, we don't have exclusive streaming rights after a year, at that point you can still make money selling the rights elsewhere, but we can stream your show for as long as we want to, and you get paid only as people watch it."

Netflix movie selection is a joke compared to when I first got it, and there's no good reason to keep losing and regaining TV shows and movies. There has to be a better way to pay content holders and not have timed contracts to show their content.

Friends theme song band? Could you tell me why Netflix constantly pulls content you want to keep watching?

 
Last edited:
Dec 3, 2018
72
32
95
#31
Not surpised one bit. Friends is one of those evergreen shows that People keep watching like for ever.

And lol @people sad about Daredevil. It was a mediocre superhero show, and it propably was a 100% Disney decision, because you know Disney+ is a thing.

Who watches that shit?
Very literally millions and millions of people
 
Last edited:
Mar 6, 2018
1,210
1,313
265
#34
Aint going to lie, it was enjoyable when it was on. Watching reruns of it now makes me question my tastes as a teen, though. It is so corny.
They should get Two Guys, A Girl, and a Pizza place. Still corny, but a better show overall, AND you get both Ryan Reynolds and Nathan Fillion. Also a complete ripoff of Blister in the Sun for a theme song. What's not to like?
 
Apr 15, 2005
4,159
25
1,165
#36
I did rewatch most of it a while back but damn 100 mill is crazy for an old show.

Isn't Netflix running a huge debt too and hoping long term they will make money?

I wish they would get Park's and rec for canada
 
Last edited:
Mar 12, 2014
2,908
1,441
355
#38
The only explanation that makes sense to me is they got too emotionally invested in making a deal to keep it. I just cannot believe that Netflix customers, but and large, want this historic content that much to justify this cost. Great show, but come on that is a ridiculous amount if the goal is to keep the price in the 10-15 a month range.
 
Feb 7, 2007
1,363
32
940
Otterbach, Germany
#40
There's people in that article that say they only keep Netflix for Friends. They're dumb, just buy it digitally, would be cheaper than a Netflix subscription over time and you can rewatch it as much as you want.

More likely they're full of crap.

But whatever, as long as it doesn't impact my subscription price, doesn't bother me any.
 
Aug 20, 2007
2,508
5
875
Canada
#47
Should have saved the money and went for Seinfeld. Isn't that one even more expensive? Remember seeing something about that a year or two ago and was the driving factor for no streaming sites having it.

Crazy but understandable. Show is insanely popular. Wife and I rewatched all that last year I think.

Curious what the cast gets for royalties. I know it's probably more than you truly need in a lifetime.
 
Jun 30, 2010
5,135
57
590
Earth
#49
i figured it was $30 million for a period of time, only to find out it was $30 million per year, now its $80-$100 million per year that's nuts.
then in 2020 it won't even be exclusive to netflix.
 
Last edited:
Mar 5, 2007
1,444
816
915
#50
The show isn't that good but it's one of the best time wasting shows with high replayability in existence hence its popularity. You don't watch Friends to focus on it, you watch it when you want something in the backround or when you're tired and want to watch something simple and familiar to shuit your brain down. I understand why Netflix thought it's a good decision to spend all that money, shows like that might not have the best quality but they're kind of unique in a way.