overthehill99
Member
This post doesn't even make sense.fistfulofmetal said:you may think i'm exaggerating but the Beatles really are truly awful. look it up in a book or something. you'll learn a thing or two.
This post doesn't even make sense.fistfulofmetal said:you may think i'm exaggerating but the Beatles really are truly awful. look it up in a book or something. you'll learn a thing or two.
jrricky said:The people that despise Guitar Hero for this reason and not Rock Band are lol worthy.
xbhaskarx said:Can you export Guitar Hero Aerosmith / Metallica / Van Halen songs into Guitar Hero World Tour?
jrricky said:I actually dont see the difference at all.
He's a Nintendo fan. They don't have that luxury.xbhaskarx said:If you can't export the GH songs, what do you mean you "can't see the difference at all"? Wouldn't that be a difference?
Are you saying you're blind or stupid or something?
Xevren said:I'm pretty much with you Dave, I honestly dont care about any of the Rock Band or Guitar Hero games coming up at all.
TheGreatDave said:I mean, I'm all for lots of discs like this
I know like allowing you to bring songs over makes any difference at all in how the franchise is being milked. You might favor it but it doesnt make a difference if you play songs off of one disk or another, or your damn harddrive.xbhaskarx said:If you can't export the GH songs, what do you mean you "can't see the difference at all"? Wouldn't that be a difference?
Are you saying you're blind or stupid or something?
Archie said:He's a Nintendo fan. They don't have that luxury.
jrricky said:I know like allowing you to bring songs over makes any difference at all in how the franchise is being milked. You might favor it but it doesnt make a difference if you play songs off of one disk or another, or your damn harddrive.
xbhaskarx said:My mistake, sometimes I forget other people actually still use their Wiis.
xbhaskarx said:Are you pretty much with some other Dave? I'm pretty sure Dave has supported disc-based market oversaturation all along (at least in the case of GH).
jrricky said:I know like allowing you to bring songs over makes any difference at all in how the franchise is being milked. You might favor it but it doesnt make a difference if you play songs off of one disk or another, or your damn harddrive.
Pearl Jam only has three albums that are really big hits, and part of that was because they pushed out a lot of material in the early days.
TheGreatDave said:In answer to your previous post; DLC is as much "milking" as regular disc releases is. Both are the same thing, just in a different package
TheGreatDave said:DLC is as much "milking" as regular disc releases is. Both are the same thing, just in a different package
VindicatorZ said:You have no clue what you're talking about. Pearl Jam delibaretely pulled back on their own fame at their peak, because they didn't want to sell out. For those first 3 albums, they were bar none, the biggest band in the world. Bigger than Nirvana, Soundgarden, Alice in Chains, anybody...
No Code came out, they did no promotion, no music videos, no nothing. They experimented with their style, continuing to make amazing music, just not the typical anthems people were used to. But they never stopped.
Then came Yield, that was a huge success. Do the Evolution was their first video in like 10 years, and it was an animated video by Todd McFarlane. They had countless radio hits off of Yield, such as In Hiding, Wishlist, Given to Fly, Evolution, Brain of J.
Continuing on, Binuaral is probably my all time favorite album. In 2000, PJ had an incredible tour. THe songs they cranked out for Binaural were fucking awsome, and the songs that they left off of the actual album that later appeared on Lost Dogs, were better singles than most bands could ever hope for "Sad, Education, In the Moonlight, Strangest Tribe, Fatal)
This band has legions of fans, and they have continued to produce awsome music.
Meier said:Pearl Jam fucking shits all over AC/DC, Metallica and Aerosmith. It isn't even close. No one compares to the Beatles obviously.
Musashi Wins! said:They weren't bigger than Nirvana, and they were never better, that's for sure. But Nirvana got cut short so who knows.
Anyhow, they don't seem relevant enough anymore for this game, but I like them, and am happy for their big fans.
lol no. I love the guys, but ending 1.5 out of 2 shows with that song is getting on my nerves.Accident said:No Yellow Ledbetter??
FAIL!
I AM JOHN! said:I heard a rumor that Jeremy spoke in class today. Can someone confirm or deny this?
shagg_187 said:That's impossible. Clearly I remember picking on the boy.
fistfulofmetal said:you may think i'm exaggerating but the Beatles really are truly awful. look it up in a book or something. you'll learn a thing or two.
:lol Always resorting to personal attacks when the odds are against eh?xbhaskarx said:My mistake, sometimes I forget other people actually still use their Wiis.
Wait so in that case, releasing new songs as DLC would also be milking, right?
fistfulofmetal said:you may think i'm exaggerating but the Beatles really are truly awful. look it up in a book or something. you'll learn a thing or two.
I wouldn't say that Pearl Jam pushed out anymore material then any other band of that time, or any band for that matter. Bands typically have a two year turn around for albums. ST in '91, VS in '93, and Vitalogy in '94. Vitalogy really only came out so quickly because of working with Brendan O'Brien after VS. I really wouldn't call that 'pushing out' material at all. Also after Vitalogy, Pearl Jam had the fan base to pretty much live off their tour receipts. They pretty much sold out every show they played for the next decade. You got to respect a band that can release 72 official bootlegs of their shows, and fans want more.Pearl Jam only has three albums that are really big hits, and part of that was because they pushed out a lot of material in the early days.
That is pretty silly. Pearl Jam was by far the most successful band to come out of the 'grunge' scene in Seattle. From '95 to '05, they were probably one of the most prolific 'rock bands' in the world. Ten has sold 13m, VS 7m, 5m.They weren't bigger than Nirvana, and they were never better, that's for sure. But Nirvana got cut short so who knows.
jrricky said::lol Always resorting to personal attacks when the odds are against eh?
If you want to know, yes, I use my Wii (as do millions of Wii owners) way more than I use my 360.
Accident said:No Yellow Ledbetter??
FAIL!
And why should you be? Are people not allowed to be fans of something? I dont get how platform preference (which means its off topic)has anything to do with how Rock Band is obviously (dont understand why this wasnt obvious from the first one) now being milked.I AM JOHN! said:
You know for some reason I'm not surprised.
And here I thought video games were produced to make money, not provide fanservice for people who know what Eddie Vedder had for breakfast.VindicatorZ said:You have no clue what you're talking about. Pearl Jam delibaretely pulled back on their own fame at their peak, because they didn't want to sell out. For those first 3 albums, they were bar none, the biggest band in the world. Bigger than Nirvana, Soundgarden, Alice in Chains, anybody...
No Code came out, they did no promotion, no music videos, no nothing. They experimented with their style, continuing to make amazing music, just not the typical anthems people were used to. But they never stopped.
Then came Yield, that was a huge success. Do the Evolution was their first video in like 10 years, and it was an animated video by Todd McFarlane. They had countless radio hits off of Yield, such as In Hiding, Wishlist, Given to Fly, Evolution, Brain of J.
Continuing on, Binuaral is probably my all time favorite album. In 2000, PJ had an incredible tour. THe songs they cranked out for Binaural were fucking awsome, and the songs that they left off of the actual album that later appeared on Lost Dogs, were better singles than most bands could ever hope for "Sad, Education, In the Moonlight, Strangest Tribe, Fatal)
This band has legions of fans man
jrricky said:And yes, but DLC does not factor into my complaint much, just when they keep making it every year with so many bundles and release versions.
fistfulofmetal said:you may think i'm exaggerating but the Beatles really are truly awful. look it up in a book or something. you'll learn a thing or two.
corkscrewblow said:This is dumb and Pearl Jam is far from being a good enough band to have their own plastic instrument game. I hope they know this is going to bomb sales wise.
corkscrewblow said:Ten is good but we already have it on RB. Vs is great and other than that they don't have an amazing album. If it's AC/DC gimped style track pack I don't give a shit but if it's a full game that's just a dumb idea. RB3 where?!
fistfulofmetal said:Beatles are boring awful tripe.
Pearl Jam decent. Ten is an ok album.
Neither are as good as Metallica
Van Halen is the ideal band for a music game.
reread my statement. I never said DLC is okay, I said yes thats milking it to but that was just someone else's complaint and not what I was directly arguing about.xbhaskarx said:So songs downloaded to a hard drive are okay, but songs copied from a disc to a hard drive are not okay?