bitbydeath
Member
What did you play it on?Not My Sky . Worst controls I came across in a flight game yet, by far.
What did you play it on?Not My Sky . Worst controls I came across in a flight game yet, by far.
No Mans Sky, but it's actually game.It's like No Mans Sky but in space
Wait, no
I don't mind you being negative on the game, feel free to rip it apart. It's easier though to just use facts, not fiction. It weakens your argument otherwise.I most definitely tried it sadly and not many years ago either. It's literaly like comparing Tomb Raider 96' with Uncharted 4. In tiny still images where you can't see or feel the trash tier gameplay it doesn't look that bad.
And yet nothing I said is wrong.I don't mind you being negative on the game, feel free to rip it apart. It's easier though to just use facts, not fiction. It weakens your argument otherwise.
Why double down? It doesn't have on-rails flying. Again it's so easy to criticize NMS, but you're doing it all wrong.And yet nothing I said is wrong.
You did actually, it isn’t on rails in the least, you sure you’re not talking about something else?And yet nothing I said is wrong.
Really you gonna double down? Try taking of from planet like in Star citizen. It's not just flight mechanics that fell like from some indie ps2 game , but everything else too from walking, shooting, any action is terrible.Why double down? It doesn't have on-rails flying. Again it's so easy to criticize NMS, but you're doing it all wrong.
The flight mechanics are one of the best parts of NMS, it’s not on rails and taking off feels amazing, if I were to criticise anything in that area it would be the dog fights, although it may have been improved since I last played.Really you gonna double down? Try taking of from planet like in Star citizen. It's not just flight mechanics that fell like from some indie ps2 game , but everything else too from walking, shooting, any action is terrible.
Really you gonna double down? Try taking of from planet like in Star citizen. It's not just flight mechanics that fell like from some indie ps2 game , but everything else too from walking, shooting, any action is terrible.
I don't think it's the "look" ppl are saying looks similar, it's the mechanics. And most of the ppl seeing this are casuals and don't really know that NMS has little story. I think they're literally looking at what the characters are doing and they just happen to find the footage with a mech too. I can't blame a casual for thinking this tho, they see a space dude with a similar style of mining, there's a mech, there is a ship you jump in and you travel from planet to planet and terrible combat LOLBut who gets the "Molyneux Game Overhyping Award" ? Sean Murray or Todd Howard ?
Jokes aside, that's a dumb comparison. It's really apples and oranges. Starfield looks far closer to Fallout or Skyrim in space. It has the space exploration and base building similar to NMS, but really it's not the same kind of games at all.
I think maybe you dont know what is meant by "on rails". Thats why i think you both feel right, because you understand that differently.Really you gonna double down? Try taking of from planet like in Star citizen. It's not just flight mechanics that fell like from some indie ps2 game , but everything else too from walking, shooting, any action is terrible.
It's not bad - it's simple/arcade. By design.Not My Sky . Worst controls I came across in a flight game yet, by far.
It didn't deserve more of my time. It was boring. Not fun. Starfield looks like a lot of fun. I know some of you were worried they couldn't find the funYou should write a full review of your 15 minutes with the game.
Yeah, really insulting to No Man's Sky devsJust goes to show how gamers no longer fully understand video games. Comparing No Mans Sky to Bethesda games is insulting and moronic.
Says the guy coping right now lolI wouldn't be surprised if No Man's Sky sees a massive jump in sales on PS consoles leading up to the release of Starfield. People are going to learn to cope one way or another. Just gotta accept that Starfield is an Xbox and PC experience only.
Coping with the fact that I get to play the game in less than a year at no additional cost to me? Yeah, you're right, hard to digest the value GamePass has given me.Says the guy coping right now lol
Nah sometimes it's good to hear a good and constructive criticism, nothings wrong with that. So that maybe their next game wont play like a ps2 title.Yeah, really insulting to No Man's Sky devs
I only really enjoy it in creative mode. I don't have the patience for survival mode.NMS has always sucked no matter how much they have improved on it, imo. Starfield looks really good.
nahhh.They should just keep updating the game as they have been. I don't think there's any need for a sequel if you go that route.
First of all there is not many space games.it is like saying GOW and hz are almost the same game because there are some similarities.
Now you’re just being mean.I'd compare this to star citizen imo.
Am I really? There was a game that looked like nms, but starfield aint it.Now you’re just being mean.
There's a lot of games mentioned that I personally wouldn't want to put time in, but there's were also games that I was surprised were going to be day 1 GP. I stop playing on Xbox after the 360, but Game Pass is something that might make me jump back into the Xbox ecosystem ( I don't game on PC so it'd be investing in the Series X).Coping with the fact that I get to play the game in less than a year at no additional cost to me? Yeah, you're right, hard to digest the value GamePass has given me.