Clevinger said:Now you're taking the polar opposite view. Everyone in the country is a "real American", good or bad, uneducated or educated, no matter what race, class, or creed.
So basically there is no data that will satisfy them . . . allowing them to believe what they want to believe.Oblivion said:As I said above, the issue with them is that the one posted online is not verifiable or could be easily forged. Or something. :lol
Your friend's either a racist or believes Obama's a secret Muslim, that's really the only two options for him.Oblivion said:As I said above, the issue with them is that the one posted online is not verifiable or could be easily forged. Or something. :lol
speculawyer said:Is it any surprise that the GOP is also more highly correlated with religion?
Also don't forget that Jesus was the definition of an extreme socialist... and we know where GOP stands in the debate about socialism.Zero Hero said:It's a front to get some votes. Jesus helped the poor but the GOP takes great strides to keep the government from doing it.
Well it depends on how you define populism. Populism is often defined as support for unions and the workers . . . and that is not what Palin is about.APF said:I like how populism is now considered the most evil thing you can espouse.
When someone invokes 'humane' treatment, what springs to mind for you? Maybe the ASPCA battling the abuse of dogs or PETA railing against the cruelty of animal testing; perhaps the ACLU advocating for proper treatment of terrorism detainees.
Whatever comes up, usually it involves people being urged to properly value the life of something that, for some reason, might be considered sub-human. It's the act of visiting kindness or compassion on something deemed less deserving -- which made it all the more telling last week when Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said he was seeking "a more humane way" of enforcing the military's policy that bans gay men and lesbians from service.
To be specific, Gates gave an interview in which he said Pentagon lawyers were researching alternative ways of implementing the ban, which currently bears no resemblance, by the way, to the magnificent policy misnomer "don't ask, don't tell." Just to be clear, in many cases, soldiers are told on, they are investigated, and they are asked.
Among other things, Gates said they were reviewing whether third-party outings should necessarily prompt an investigation.
"When we're given information from someone with vengeance in mind or blackmail, somebody who has been jilted," Gates explained, "If somebody is outed by a third party, does that force us to take action? That's the kind of thing we're looking at -- seeing if there's a more humane way to apply the law until it gets changed."
If it sounds like the government has sometimes been a willing participant in the blackmail of men and women who are voluntarily defending America's freedom -- that's not far off.
Now on one level, Gates's comments were welcome -- they were the very first indication in several months that military leaders are engaging in serious discussions with President Barack Obama about changing the policy.
On another level, his words were not only offensive, but when the phrase was repeated last Sunday by the Joint Chiefs Chairman, Admiral Mike Mullen, the tandem laid bare the cultural generation gap that remains the biggest hurdle to our nation doing what 23 of our NATO allies have already done -- let those who are willing to die for their country do so in full view of their countrymen.
Even more striking to me was their misguided emphasis on some perverse notion of mercy when one would think their focus would be on building the strongest military possible. Is it really conceivable that, somehow, it hasn't occurred to these guys that kicking out some 13,000 soldiers over the past 16 years -- hundreds of whom had mission-critical skills -- might undermine the military's ability to effectively do its job? If that is the case, then nothing short of homophobia is blinding them from the truth.
And while it's perfectly noble for Sec. Gates and Adm. Mullen to be aspiring to a kinder, gentler force, quite frankly I think they're pondering the wrong question.
Shouldn't the measure of any military policy be whether it's promoting
national security in a manner consistent with our constitutional values?
With all due respect, Mr. Secretary, the next time you're mulling the ouster of gay service members, skip the paternalism and just tell us whether we're safer and whether we're upholding American ideals.
The GOP rails against socialism, but as far as sacrificing our freedoms and taking our monies for the sake of big business, I'd say Bush would make a great socialist.NetMapel said:Also don't forget that Jesus was the definition of an extreme socialist... and we know where GOP stands in the debate about socialism.
...speculawyer said:Well it depends on how you define populism. Populism is often defined as support for unions and the workers . . . and that is not what Palin is about
mAcOdIn said:Your friend's either a racist or believes Obama's a secret Muslim, that's really the only two options for him.
You could try this:
Obama is a naturally born US citizen because none of his enemies in the "know," for instance Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and all his other adversaries in the Democratic primaries ever outed him. I think it's foolish to believe that everyone in the Democratic party are such party first people as to not secure their own shot at the Presidency by outing a non natural born citizen. Not to mention the fact that if this were a conspiracy that it would make George Bush and Dick Cheney equally guilty for not ensuring that their successors were legit.
Same reason it makes more sense that we did go the moon as opposed to a conspiracy, Russia would have known if we were lying and yet never pushed the issue. It would have been a huge embarrassment to the country had they exposed our "lie" and yet they didn't, because we did go.
That's the best I got, but I really think he's just a racist or Muslim hater.
In my opinion not all racism is universally applied.Oblivion said:Yeah, it's really weird. It's doubtful he's racist or just hates Muslims since we have one of both living in our place (both he asked to stay). It's just really shocking since he's otherwise been extremely intelligent about almost everything.
He also seems to not think Obama's not right for our troops and seemed offended that he bowed to a Saudi king. Alas, what can you do...
There's different degrees of racism. You can live with a black guy and still think one shouldn't run the country, or even have a higher position than you at work.Oblivion said:It's doubtful he's racist
Maybe Al Franken had a heart to heart with Reid and told him to grow a pair.Incognito said:...and saw the news that Harry Reid developed a spine and is losing patience with Max Bacaus. In effect, he is telling Max to tell the GOP to get bent. Push me over with a feather-- best thing I've heard in weeks.
He's got to be addicted to am radio or Hannity or something. Things like the 'bowing to the Saudi King' is one of those talking points you can only go for if you are hardcore GOPer/conservative. I mean fuck, look at this:Oblivion said:He also seems to not think Obama's not right for our troops and seemed offended that he bowed to a Saudi king. Alas, what can you do...
speculawyer said:I mean fuck, look at this:
So Bush is his girlfriend but Obama just sucks his cock? Is that it? Key-rist.APF said:I agree it's a non-issue, but bending over to have someone place a medal or necklace on you is not "bowing," nor are kissing or holding hands. Further, none of those acts acts of subservience,
This is why we can't have nice things.speculawyer said:So Bush is his girlfriend but Obama just sucks his cock? Is that it? Key-rist.
I'd get a lil' chub over oil money too.Tyrone Slothrop said:
so precious
Good god man.. where did you get this shop? North Korea?speculawyer said:
Dude, just google 'bush kissing saudi'. (Or was that sarcasm?)Number 2 said:Good god man.. where did you get this shop? North Korea?
There is zero hope for this country. i see this now.speculawyer said:Dude, just google 'bush kissing saudi'. (Or was that sarcasm?)
NetMapel said:If you're a citizen of a country, you're SUPPOSED TO BE EQUAL. DIDN'T JESUS SAY TO TREAT EVERYBODY EQUALLY ?
speculawyer said:Dude, just google 'bush kissing saudi'. (Or was that sarcasm?)
Even for GAF, this can be hard... and this is why people are often quick to criticize the media. By perpetually focussing on talking points and partisanship, the collective whole of the 24/7 news networks have made these things further ingrained in the political discourse of this country.APF said:I thought we were supposed to be countering talking points and fakes, not perpetuating them. As I said, this is why we can't have nice things.
APF said:Your first link doesn't even allude to "Real America." [edit: OIC, "pro-America"] Sill, look at what you wrote: "Everyday Americans" "Not all in Washington DC." If it was your intent, how does the quote you posted contradict my comment?
You folks never ever never seem to read anything you respond to. Where are the *real* posters here?
We believe, we believe that the best of America is in the small towns that we get to visit, and in the wonderful little pockets of what I call the real America, being here with all of you hard working very patriotic, very pro-America areas of this great nation.
Hasn't that love affair ended? He's a terrible White House correspondent.Hootie said:Chuck Godd on Morning Joe!
No, you read more. As I said, the first link doesn't mention "real America.". The second one does, and I address that too. Christ people. And WTF does the Iraq war have to do with her comments? Note you don't try and address anything I actually said. In fact, as usual I have no idea what you are actually arguing now.cartoon_soldier said:Read More.
Where is JayDub, normally a comment like this would've brought him to the computer already.Shiggie said:who is this new douche on MSNBC talking about how its bad to use tax money to boost the economy? Am I missing something? Isnt this what tax money is for?
Sadly it has. He regurgitates false talking points and tries to 'balance' it with facts.Steve Youngblood said:Hasn't that love affair ended? He's a terrible White House correspondent.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/06/arizona-is-6000-years-old/DISCOVER said:Blogs / Bad Astronomy
« kilochars
Texas: careening toward doom »
Arizona is 6000 years old?
submit to reddit . .
Ian ONeill at Astroengine posted this stunning bit of video featuring Arizona State Senator Sylvia Allen.
Its not that she says the Earth is 6000 years old twice, just to make sure that floors me. Its the casual way she said it, as if she said "I had a cup of coffee today." From her manner, its clear that not only does she believe this complete and utter nonsense, but this is a simple fact woven into her mind just like the Sun is bright or chocolate is tasty.
To her, the Earth being 6000 years old just is.
Now, to be fair, this video is without context, and so we cant be absolutely sure shes a creationist. But it sure as heck sounds that way, and given her voting record it fits right in.
The irony, of course and theres always irony when creationism is involved is that shes talking about uranium mining, and its through the radioactive decay of uranium that we know the Earth is billions of years old. And she also praises technological achievements!
Yeah, I see it now . . . someone took the image of them kissing and just pushed their faces even closer together. I didn't notice it when I grabbed the image from the many available.Masta_Killah said::lol spec, look around the area of Bush's tie(near the bottom). He's obviously talking about the bad editing to the image.
mckmas8808 said:Dude APF is just fucking with you. He knows that what Palin said is bullshit and that there's no such thing as a "real American". You're either an American or you're not.
There are real Americans that live in DC, LA, NYC, Chicago, etc. GTFO is you don't believe that.
GrayFoxPL said:
"Is it this big?"
"It's this big!"
Operations said:Not sure if this has been posted already (did a search, nothing came up). This dumb senator says Earth is 6000 years old:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/06/arizona-is-6000-years-old/
The video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtzJhTfQiMA
Lucky Forward said:"You don't have to pass an IQ test to be in the Senate."
Arkansas Senator Mark Pryor, "Religulous"