What's the difference between this and every site out there posting the announcement of mountain dew game fuel coming back? Loads of sites did that.
Mostly because it wasn't the appropriate resolution for the site and looked blurry.
Look, do I think it was the best, most useful post we've ever run? No, I don't. Do I see any malice in running it? Nope!
This smells like a witch hunt to me all we're doing is keeping the comments thread clear and on-topic. Since that was going to require a lot of maintenance, we just turned comments off.
We've spent a lot of money creating great gaming content that I think goes beyond what many of our peers have. I hope you look to that when you decide to dismiss the entire site based on one contest post. Here's a story from today!
You made an article on the most annoying, talentless youtube personality on the net. Great job.
What's the difference between this and every site out there posting the announcement of mountain dew game fuel coming back? Loads of sites did that.
Press ReleasePress Reset
Why isn't this a banned site yet?
Sure, but "regurgitating a press release" is not the same as "advertising" is all I'm saying. It's not advertising if you're not getting paid for it.
Guys, there's no controversy here. We decided to run a post, via EGM, that Pizza Hut was offering a prize to UK customers. Readers like to know when they can win free stuff, so we ran a post. There is no advertorial here since we weren't paid to put the piece up. Perhaps you didn't think the piece was newsworthy well, that's fine. I encourage you to let us know at feedback@polygon.com and we'll use that feedback to influence our editorial direction.
What we won't allow is to have a bunch of people invade the comments and accuse us of wrongdoing. It's off-topic, and it's not helpful. If you want to believe there's a controversy behind everything, that's fine. We have a public ethics statement and we stick by it. If that's not enough for you to believe, then I'm sorry.
In short, we welcome your feedback, but in an appropriate venue. The comments thread of an article isn't that venue.
I LoL'd
Christopher Grant said:Please read our Community Guidelines here – we reserve every right to delete comments that aren't helpful or on-topic. If you want to criticize us, you're welcome to send us an email to feedback@polygon.com. If you want to make a new account – which all the detractors here have done – and come here to rile up negativity, we're going to stop you.
We're closing this thread for now and will reconsider opening it later.
You're alright.
Annndd......we are down to one comment:
Positivity only guys, please.
Patrick K. did it the right way. A different perspective was applied to the press and it wasn't recycled PR garbage.
Viewing payment solely in terms of direct cash transfers is exactly the kind of myopia rampant in gaming "journalism" that's led to the controversy of the past week.
Sure, but not every video games site on the planet claimed to be the next Tad Szulc's of games jingoism. I don't expect you to know who Tad Szulc is, just as I don't expect polygon to be nothing more than a pr outlet.Every video game site on the planet probably ran that press release. CONSPIRACY
New games journalism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AT65jPiDFiE
Censorship is what Polygon is doing.
The comments that were deleted were not rude, profane or otherwise offensive.
They were, however, critical.
Not allowed.
The denial and lack of understanding in your post is what's stunning.
Didn't take you long to pull out the conspiracy theorist card, lol.Better get out my tinfoil hat then. A Video Game site posting a press release about a video game. They must be in somebodys pocket.
Sure, but not every video games site on the planet claimed to be the next Tad Szulc's of games jingoism. I don't expect you to know who Tad Szulc is, just as I don't expect polygon to be nothing more than a pr outlet.
Censorship is what Polygon is doing.
The comments that were deleted were not rude, profane or otherwise offensive.
They were, however, critical.
Not allowed. Positivity only.
They just didn't want them to detract from all the thought provoking posts about how awesome pizza hut is.
It's the only gaming site I visit, yes. I like to keep a clean lawn.Why, is NeoGAF the only place on the Internet, to you?
goddamit gowans.
Sure, but not every video games site on the planet claimed to be the next Tad Szulc's of games jingoism. I don't expect you to know who Tad Szulc is, just as I don't expect polygon to be nothing more than a pr outlet.
Didn't take you long to pull out the conspiracy theorist card, lol.
goddammit gowans.
at least make the MS connection clear in the thread title and clean up your possessive pro-nouns.
Better get out my tinfoil hat then. A Video Game site posting a press release about a video game. They must be in somebodys pocket.
...Does posting this as news not violate your own ethics guidelines?
No, you're just trying to end discussion by ridiculing those opposed to what you say because you have no real argument against anything the "conspiracy theorists" are saying.Took even shorter for the conspiracy theorists to show up. I was just calling 'em out.
I vote that ghst's post replaces Gowans' as the thread-starter