Did this just get unlocked?
Apparently.
EDIT: Shit. Why do posts I actually want at the top of a page never end up there, and crap like this does!?
Did this just get unlocked?
why was this locked then unlocked?
funny review. felt like they fairly assessed a lot of the games shortcomings
why was this locked then unlocked?
funny review. felt like they fairly assessed a lot of the games shortcomings
Gunshot fade to black? GUNSHOT FADE TO BLACK?!
why was this locked then unlocked?
funny review. felt like they fairly assessed a lot of the games shortcomings
No, not really. All the time while I was playing BTS I was either thinking "You have great concepts here, make an actual video game out of this" or "I wish this was a movie so I could at least not confuse myself with nonsensical next-gen analog to pixel hunting".Say what you will about Heavy Rain or Beyond Two Souls, but you can't watch the games on youtube and say you've gotten the full experience of "playing" those games.
I got a couple minutes in where they were trying to explain the setting being Steampunk-ish, and I know this isn't for me.
The game could have done a ton more than it did gameplay-wise, but I really enjoyed it. There were so many things about it that were just so good otherwise.
Thats probably the best thing about it. They ripped it to shreds without even touching the "I rather have a 6 hour fun game than a 20 hour boring game" bullshit defense mechanism that was used for this game's length.yes. and they didn't even mention the game's length either.
Hey now, don't forget the dick punches. They loved the dick punches.The way they literally attack every single aspect of this game, leaving no room for "but this part was good" was excellent.
why was this locked then unlocked?
Flawless victory, right there.Best part of the review is the kill counter after the "not going to kill anyone" scene
I think whoever locked the thread forgot that there is no review thread for The Order anymore. lolDid this just get unlocked?
David Cage games have actual branching paths. Which is more than can be said for even the Telltale games. That's just something you can't do on youtube, unless you watch like 10 different playthroughs of the game or something.No, not really. All the time while I was playing BTS I was either thinking "You have great concepts here, make an actual video game out of this" or "I wish this was a movie so I could at least not confuse myself with nonsensical next-gen analog to pixel hunting".
It's exact same thing. Heard Heavy Rain was better. Maybe it was, but I have no intention on giving it a try after BTS.
Apparently all TO1886 has over that is a standard issue GoW-type shooting.
MGS3 has like, twenty more minutes of content after thedat ending
But I think they do give it a fair shake compared to some other reviews by focusing on the story. Since the game is clearly meant to be more of a cinematic experience, it's actually pretty damning that the story is so full of plot cliches and bad characterization. Also, didn't MGS3 almost end with a similar cut to black - gunshot? There was a bit more afterwards but that was also pretty bad. Recycling a boss encounter for the final boss that closely has got to be one of the laziest / rushed conclusions to a game I've ever seen, only compounded by the unresolved plot points.
Who wants a pizza roll?
MGS3 has like, twenty more minutes of content after the, and that's important because it gives context to the final confrontation of the game. It's nothing at all similar to what was done in The Order.gunshot/fade to black scenario
Lemme guess: They don't like it. They seem to gravitate toward indie games and Nintendo stuff, and mostly seem to dislike AAA-budget games.
I still love you, Red Letter Media.
That is the Plinkett stuff.
THAT deserves its own thread.
Yes, I love RLM but I don't like Previously Recorded at all. They seem to me to be trying too hard to dislike stuff and had some incredibly weird complaints about Alien Isolation, as a recent example I watched.
I think they'd prefer any game interaction that was attached to choice in The Order. They spend multiple minutes discussing this.
As far as testing a player's "skill or attentiveness" how does "press X to continue cutscene" do either in an enjoyable or meaningful way?
Also, it doesn't actually cut to black. ¯\_(ツ_/¯ MGS4 is the one that does it, and then it goes ahead andYeah, people making that comparison really have no understanding of the trope at play.
For a game that seems to get majority hate, sure does get a lot of coverage.
And what games do they enjoy?
I remember them liking Mario Kart 8, Guacamele, Crypt of the Necrodancer, Invisible Inc (though it being Early Access was a sticking point), Risk of Rain, and, in a round-about-way of picking on Call of Duty, the Mario games.
Just watched final and credits part. God damn, I wish I saw that live just to see all the chat reactions.I love these guys. Its the only twitch steam I watch. And the only one I will everrrrr watch.
The melt down is still on their twitch steam for the ending, it was pretty great.
http://www.twitch.tv/previouslyrecorded_live/v/3835355 2hrs 42mins in. You have to try a few times usually cause the audio can get funky.
They destroyed the game cause thats what they do at the ends on their series 'best of the worst' for really bad movies they watch.
Also, didn't MGS3 almost end with a similar cut to black - gunshot? There was a bit more afterwards but that was also pretty bad.
It's not a game about making choices. It was never pitched as a game about making choices. It's like complaining your seafood platter tastes of fish or being mad no one would just talk normal at the opera.
Isn't there a review thread for stuff like this?
A lot nonsense to obfuscate one simple fact: the illusive standard which you debate distinguish professional reviewers from a forumner.
What standard do you speak of? Aren't reviews plagued by selective criticism - or, "inconsistencies"? In instances showcase bias? In instances showcase non-adherance to their own "guidelines"? Aren't these guidelines different from outlet to outlet? Scoring systems different from outlet to outlet? Aren't these guidelines changed on a whim because of "flaws"? Aren't scoring system criticized by "reviewers" themselves because of lack of inclusiveness? Aren't reviews subjective opinions in practice despite the allusiveness of objective analysis?
Can a forumner not adhere to guidelines? Can a forumner not be well spoken, or have good writing skills and post coherent "reviews" aka final impressions on a product? Can a forumner not have a degree?
Ultimately, can a forumner not have a voice because of a difference in platforms? Is the quality diminished by the platform? NO.
How about we stop pretending x platform = good, y platform = bad and judge the content of words by their own merit? I mean people do this all the time with review sites themselves? IGN>Polygon, Gametrailers>Gamespot bla bla bla..... my favorite is x, y is a joke.
Lets look at GAF: I trust final impressions from poster x on GAF, distrust impressions from poster Y on GAF because of X, Y, Z.
Luther King Jr. would be proud.
This isn't even a review.
Its just satire.
They literally don't have one positive thing to say about the game.
This isn't even a review.
Its just satire.
They literally don't have one positive thing to say about the game.
This isn't even a review.
Its just satire.
They literally don't have one positive thing to say about the game.
There are more good than bad things about the game.What if there.....Isn't *gasp* No but really would that would of made the review better for you if they lied?
There are more good than bad things about the game.
But it is so cool to hate on the game! They are cool.
There are more good than bad things about the game.
They specifically say that it isn't steampunk though.
Lemme guess: They don't like it. They seem to gravitate toward indie games and Nintendo stuff, and mostly seem to dislike AAA-budget games.
I still love you, Red Letter Media.
There are more good than bad things about the game.