Majima Everywhere System
Member
Top hats gentlemen!
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Red Dead Redemption - 360 & PS3 comparison (Bish-approved!)
- Thread starter Mik2121
- Start date
zero margin
Member
quality post junior, this isn't the vesti.
Kazuma Kiryu
Member
DrBo42 said:
we really love posts like these though:lol
We don't know yet:lol .Y2Kev said:
these are confirmed
PS3
Pros
-Exclusive content: gang outfit and gang hideout
-support for custom soundtrack (XMB)
-Home avatars
Cons
-resolution ???
-600MB install (mandatory)
-Gamespy
XBOX 360
-720p 2xMSAA (confirmed by MazingerDUDE)
-Avatar awards
-Custom soundtrack obviously is supported like all the other 360 games.
there were some framerate comparisons by Magnus and he said framerate is better on 360.
He wrote about lots of other things like lighting, tearing, pop in etc (nothing important, small things), I can't find his posts, they are in the official thread.
Dead Prince
Banned
pop ins are important. you don't want to be riding on a horse and crash into an invisible tree that pops up seconds later!
I wasn't ever serious, I just find the absurdity of last-minute PS3 exclusive content found almost by accident really amusing. I mean, Sony has yet to say anything about it and I don't think RS has said anything either. Then again, it is just a tophat/costume and hideout.DrBo42 said:
It's so bizarre and kinda hilarious.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
No_Style said:
You're most probably not gonna get proper answers until the inevitable eurogamer face off, so until then get the version you want and play and enjoy it until you're told how it's not better than the other one at which point you can proceed to hate it
Tylahedras
Banned
miladesn said:
Mandatory install? Fucking...
Kazuma Kiryu
Member
DrBo42 said:
i'm not accusing you of anything. i'm just saying, i believe people in this thread are expecting to see something like what you posted, but instead from someone who means it (and since you actually had a conversation with him...you're disqualified to bring us meltdown enjoyment
)edit: this thread seems pretty much just for giggles, so i wouldn't take much of what people here post as their actual opinion. i think 90% of people here just want to play the game, console versions aside.
AranhaHunter
Banned
I've been curious about this and I think this is as good a thread as any to ask this, what makes a review go on metacritic? What I mean is the Eurogamer, Eurogamer Spain reviews seems to be for both the PS3 and 360, but it's only on the PS3 meta and not on the 360. Likewise Gamesradar PS3 review is up on meta, but not the 360 one. I'm sure there are more examples and other examples of some reviews that are on 360 but not on PS3, but you get my point. So does anyone know why that is? What makes a review go up on meta?
TheThunder
Member
So lame jokes aside does the PS3 version runs better or worse than GTA 4 ?
WickedLaharl
Member
haha this is starting to remind me of the gta4 comparison thread with users posting lists and whatnot.
was pretty damn funny once the truth came out.
my favorite posts where when users said they preferred the ps3 version because gta4 on 360 looked "too gamey". :lol
was pretty damn funny once the truth came out.
my favorite posts where when users said they preferred the ps3 version because gta4 on 360 looked "too gamey". :lol
kazuma_pt said:i'm not accusing you of anything. i'm just saying, i believe people in this thread are expecting to see something like what you posted, but instead from someone who means it (and since you actually had a conversation with him...you're disqualified to bring us meltdown enjoyment
I just find it really sad that threads like this even have to be made. Exclusive this, exclusive that, 1 more pixel on that horse saddle/9000x super dynamic multifaceted bump mapped anti-aliasing. It's nauseating. Eventually the threads calm down to a point where people are actually sharing experiences with each other like human beings, but we really have to sit through some bullshit.
WickedLaharl
Member
miladesn said:eh I just posted all the known facts, I didn't add anything
on no it's cool. i was just reminiscing is all
Pucc said:
http://multiplayer.it/video/red-dead-redemption-per-ps3/red-dead-redemption-videorecensione.lo/
Go to about 1:20 of the video and watch the shadows on the buildings.
No?
The PS3 version of GTA had its issues, but the lower resolution actually did not have a significant impact. The 360 version was a touch clearer, but had a lot of additional dithering artifacts. It ran smoother, however, which made it the superior version.
Terrordactyl
Member
It really depends on the game, skate, madden, and fifa are the types of games I would use custom soundtracks in. Killzone 2 mp had it and I never used it, so I guess game where peripheral sound isn't a big deal, I would say yes, they do matter.Havok said:
I don't see any problem with pointing out the differences between the two versions of RDR. There's obviously not a lot to point out, but there's nothing "retarded" on trying to decide which version to get if you own both consoles. The fact that the OP thinks comparing the versions is "retarded" leads me to believe he may have a secret bias. Also, not to derail, but isn't using that term a ban-worthy offense? Honest question.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Sticky