Shh poster who has been to previous screenings and known at shh
it is 100% confirmed that he went to a batman screening?
Shh poster who has been to previous screenings and known at shh
it is 100% confirmed that he went to a batman screening?
Ras Al Ghul or however you spell it is in the film as well.
That's my final spoiler, I have work to do. There are no big surprises besides that I think. Maybe people were expecting too much of a shocker.
Monk, lies are a part of your game.
If that is the real ending, then I will probably see it.
I told my buddy already that I would not see it opening night and wait for spoilers on if he died or not. I had no intentions of seeing it if he died. I'm not even that big a fan of Batman as a character but killing him?
I like Nolan and his films but "I'm Christopher Nolan and I can kill the Batman." And WB saying "Sure. We'll just reboot it in two years."
Fuck that noise. I was 99% sure it would happen too.
so who's bought their tickets already? can you even reserve them now? I gotta look into it
I hope you fucking burn if you're full of shit.
How would you guys feel if Damian was incorporated someway? The MPAA rating lists sensuality and the SHH guys imply that has to do with Talia.
What if she gets knocked up by Bruce and the film ends with Damian's birth. I have no expectation of this happening, but I'd like to see how the Internet reacts, haha.
I've heard that Batman "dies" but Bruce lives.
There is no Robin/Nightwing.
Batman defeats Bane by removing his mask which feeds him painkilling chemicals.
Just what I heard bros.
The last line of the film is Bruce asking his new son "Why do we fall?" Lolololol.
so he doesn't kill him? Interesting, has he killed any villains to date? Does dent count? He did die from the fall after all.
You obviously mean Terry, his adopted son.
Someone didn't watch the second season finale of JLU!
You obviously mean Terry, his adopted son.
http://manarchymag.com/core/2012/07/dark-knight-rises-sneak-review/Katy Purry said:If you thought The Dark Knight introduced us to a dystopia, just wait until you watch this movie. We learn that it is not only Bruce Wayne and Batman that are rotting from the inside out, but an entire society. You will see urbanites at their most wretched, and in their prime. The chaos wrought unto Gotham City by the Joker was merely the beginning. And Nolan manages to convey this wild ride into 165 minutes of his best work.
Best conclusion to a film I have seen since âThe Shawshank Redemptionâ. Thatâs all I can say. 9.2/10
I would probably rank the films like thisâ¦
Batman Begins â 8.4/10
The Dark Knight â 8.7/10
The Dark Knight Rises â 9.2/10
Best film trilogy since âThe Lord of the Ringsâ. The only thing that really stopped this film from scoring higher was that, unfortunately, it does drag a little bit. The running time was my only concern going in. Itâs not so much a fault in the film itself (the running time is necessary to bring the trilogy full circle, and to answer any unresolved questions), I just got a little uncomfortable sitting in the theatre for so long haha.
And yes, there was a standing ovation at the end. Brilliant, brilliant film. Literally in the same league as âThe Godfather: Part IIâ in terms of story-telling and character. The real question is, whatâs next for Mr. Nolan?
Read more: http://www.nolanfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=10680&start=30#ixzz2004CqJ4j
Cant believe they killed Alfred in this.
:/
THE DARK KNIGHT RISES is a fantasy action film in which Batman returns to Gotham City when it is threatened by a new enemy. The film was classified '12A' for moderate violence.
There are a number of scenes of moderate violence and these generally occur during fast-paced fights between characters who are clearly defined as good or bad. Although there are heavy blows and impacts, little is shown in terms of injury detail, with the emphasis firmly placed on the abilities of the characters involved. One sequence sees the sustained beating of one character by another but the scene serves to emphasise the powerful and ruthless nature of the attacker rather than presenting sadism for its own sake. A stabbing carries little visual detail and the focus is on the treachery of the character using the knife rather than on any sense of relish in violence. The Guidelines at '12A'/'12' state 'Moderate violence is allowed but should not dwell on detail. There should be no emphasis on injuries or blood, but occasional gory moments may be permitted if justified by the context'.
The film also contains a single use of moderate language when a woman is referred to as a 'dumb bitch', as well as some milder bad language, including uses of 'Jesus', 'hell', 'peeing', 'son of a bitch', 'balls' and 'bastard'. There are also infrequent mild sex references.
So.....do you still want to be permabanned?
a woman is referred to as a 'dumb bitch'
Planar, why'd you tell Hype thread dwellers not to come here? Was that dude from the front page correct?