I still don't see the direct comparison when relating it to on the go remote play/ off TV functionality.
I don't have to carry my PS4 to work to use it's remote play feature. Where as with the WiiU last time I checked you have to basically be within eye sight of it and have no walls/barriers in its way.
Both are great uses of the off TV feature but I feel like remote play via the Vita is more practical for taking your console games with you out of the house/room.
I completely agree with everything you said there. Well put. I think the PS4 remote play is superior in that regard.
For me personally, I haven't owned a handheld since the original GBA way back when and have no intention of gaming outside of my home anymore. Gaikai and what Sony is doing is great for the Vita because this will undoubtedly sell some units which they have struggling to do as of late.
I'm personally rooting for the VitaTV to come Stateside so I can stream to another TV as I just can't justify the purchase of a Vita in my circumstance.
Sony has had wireless Remote Play since the PSP. Nintendo was still flirting with link cables at the time.
Also, I believe Nintendo themselves refers to our more as "off-screen play" than actual "remote play". The difference is that with a PSP/Vita, you can actually control and operate the console wirelessly without having to play a game. In addition to that, you don't even have to be in the same building to be able to use Remote Play. Once again, it goes back to the "remote" emphasis. Nintendo only offers off-screen play, and only through direct connection. So no, the WiiU and PS4/Vita are not equals.
Correct. Wii U is off-screen and PS4 is remote play. I also never said they were equals. This whole idea is about having the ability to take console gameplay off the TV and onto another device.
Explain the first post, and everything else after it.
First post is what first posts on NeoGAF usually are, puns or jokes. Everything else are people stating that the first post was funny, followed by Nintendo shouldn't even be spoken about in this topic, to the stereotypical childish console wars commonly found on GameFAQs. My post only said that it is fair for Nintendo to be included in this conversation as both systems have similar awesome features.
You salty as hell, bro.
At the end of the day, it's irrelevant which console did it first; it's all about expanding on feature sets, and Remote Play for Vita does that, which makes it much better than the WiiU solution...
Salty? Seriously, this new "umad" thing is tiring. Try to be civil please.
I agree that the Vita is a better solution for those going out of the home. I never said otherwise. I'm simply pointing out the Nintendo is included in this conversation and is not shitting up anything. How hard is that for anyone to understand?
Shield is very limited with what it works with at the moment. Only problem really apart from size [and needing a compatible PC].
Really? I was considering picking one up next month to stream to my TV. I guess I can move my PC but I'd rather not... Blegh.