Who the hell are you talking to, Tubs?tiong_fi said:Welcome to the 20th century.
Low resolution textures played at a high resolution.Branduil said:Why does it look so much worse than the GC version?
The same Reason why DMC3 need a PC port.Aristotlekh said:Didn't this game come out like 8 years ago? Why does there even need to be a PC port (especially with RE5 on everybody's mind anyway)?
I could understand it if there was a big graphical update and some new levels or something, but the game looks like ass. Better be a major budget title.
AlanHemberger said:Who the hell are you talking to, Tubs?
Uh, friggin Handbanana over there.
Low resolution textures played at a high resolution.
Branduil said:The GC had better lighting than this though. Did they just port the PS2 version?
Indeed it looks much betterRody said:The PS2 version does not look like that.
ColdBlooded33 said:It Looks like House of the Dead 2 :lol :lol :lol :lol
All it needs is "G's bloodstains.."
mrkgoo said:It seems a lot of games that are designed for lower res, look really harsh and unreal in the hi-res space.
Looks better than Halo did in 2001Armitage said:I have a hard time believing that's as good as the PC version can look. That would have been acceptable in what, 2000 maybe?
aeolist said:Looks better than Halo did in 2001
Not that that's saying much
Nuclear Muffin said:WTF! it looks like a Dreamcast game and I am not exaggerating!
No you're being generousNuclear Muffin said:WTF! it looks like a Dreamcast game and I am not exaggerating!
The game fails without mouse support.- No mouse support
- Cutscene equal to PS2 version (640x480 movie)
- Only resolution option (AA and AF not supported, maybe by forcing it through ATI/Nvidia driver)
- The game is in english
- Frame limiter in 60 fps
- X360 joypad support (others too)
Ike said:I really don't like the thought of RE4 with PC controls honestly
cvxfreak said:It was ported from PS2 because it contains the extra Ada minigame. Weird that the title is biohazard 4 with English text though.