• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Resident Evil: Afterlife (film) updates

This will most likely be an excellent DVD movie. The first movie was good, second was just decent and third was
OMG ARE THEY USING TELEKENSIS WTF?!
:lol
 
How About No said:
Milla looks nice...?
gaf.jpg

That's all I can sayy -.-

I hate your avatar.
 
Exclamation-One said:
I hate your avatar.
:lol :lol :lol
Yours better and closer to the real one.. :D
Was planning on doing something like it, after being around 10 months with no avatar...for the second time... :p
 
The only good one was the first. :|

First at least was semi-plausible in an alternate canon universe. Now they're just ruining my fond memories of the games by adding characters and shitting on their backstory and Alice is now a Mary Sue. :|

Fuck you, Paul, fuck you. :|
 
Wasn't K-Mart killed in the 3rd one? Oh no I'm thinking about L.J. I have to admit this movie series is a guilty pleasure for me so I'll be there opening day...
 
I like how the plot outline for this apparently has nothing to do with the giant clone army assembled at the end of the third movie. Don't see how you really clean that up but it's not like there's been any real kind of continuity in these things.
 
LEELOO DALLAS MULTI PASS

I still think the first Resident Evil movie is watchable, and Jill Valentine in the second one is just obscenely sexy, but the rest of this series is an utter trainwreck. The monster thing LeelooDallasMultiPass fights at the end of the third movie is a guy in such a horrendous rubber costume they wouldn't even have used it on a second rate X-Files episode.
 
I think the third one is actually best because they stop pretending that it has anything whatsoever to do with the games and just have goofy fun with it. The first two are godawful, shitty adaptations of games that should have been pretty easily adapted into films. The third is just insane and doesn't give a shit anymore and spirals off into its own thing, which makes it better imo than something retarded like trying to make a Code: Veronica movie with Alice added into it.
 
badcrumble said:
I think the third one is actually best because they stop pretending that it has anything whatsoever to do with the games and just have goofy fun with it. The first two are godawful, shitty adaptations of games that should have been pretty easily adapted into films. The third is just insane and doesn't give a shit anymore and spirals off into its own thing, which makes it better imo than something retarded like trying to make a Code: Veronica movie with Alice added into it.

I AM ALEXANDER ASHFORD! MWA-HA-HA!

They already ruined Wesker, why not ruin
an already shitty character
Ashford?
 
NintendosBooger said:
Let's get real, people. The first one wasn't good; it's just that the sequels were so bad that it made the first one look good.
The first and second piss me off more than the third, actually. The first because I read the Romero screenplay and it was far, far better, so I knew what it could have been; the second because Raccoon City is probably my favorite setting ever for games and they completely turded it up. Afterlife has the advantage of no longer being adapted from the games whatsoever. It's still crap, of course.
 
NintendosBooger said:
Let's get real, people. The first one wasn't good; it's just that the sequels were so bad that it made the first one look good.

What exactly was so bad about the first movie? It actually had a story that followed closely to the first RE game, characters that were stereotypical but fun, and enemy cameos that had to put a smile on your face
 
Top Bottom