Fisticuffs
Member
Chichikov said:So yeah, being able to make a half burned former DA who kills peopled based on chance into a quasi-realistic character is a pretty impressive feat, but why bother?
wtf does this even mean?
Chichikov said:So yeah, being able to make a half burned former DA who kills peopled based on chance into a quasi-realistic character is a pretty impressive feat, but why bother?
It means that it's a fairly silly character to begin with, who through considerable effort and talent got translated into something less silly.Fisticuffs said:wtf does this even mean?
Chichikov said:Just saw it (already LTTP?)
I do agree that this is probably the best serious treatment to a superhero on film.
But by setting it sights high it also hit the glass ceiling of the source material smack in its face -
For a movie that revolves around crime, it takes a beyond simplistic and reactionary approach to its subject matter.
Now I wasn't expecting any serious social discussion from my summer blockbusters, but the movie just throw it straight at my face, and it does a pretty poor job at it.
It could have been a brilliant action movie, but it's dragged down by misplaced aspiration for a morality tale that just doesn't work, and quite honestly, plays like something out of creative writing 101.
And it's a shame, because there's considerable talent on display there (not a huge fan of Nolan, but outside some stupid rotating cameras dialog scenes he stay out of the way, and he got pretty damn good at directing big action scenes) and one cannot help but wonder if that talent was not better served channeled to a more mature source material (or alternatively, have fun with its silliness).
So yeah, being able to make a half burned former DA who kills peopled based on chance into a quasi-realistic character is a pretty impressive feat, but why bother?
Well, that showed me.Totakeke said:Yeah, I have simply no idea what you're talking about.
Chichikov said:It means that it's a fairly silly character to begin with, who through considerable effort and talent got translated into something less silly.
But why bother?
Why just don't start with a less silly?
Chichikov said:It means that it's a fairly silly character to begin with, who through considerable effort and talent got translated into something less silly.
But why bother?
Why just don't start with a less silly?
Yes she is.OuterWorldVoice said:I thought it was too long.
I thought the plotting and twists were excellent.
I FUCKING HATE BATMAN VOICE.
I thought Harvey was better than the reviews have claimed.
I almost choked on my coke when the Joker said to Gyllenhal, "You are beautiful," and almost blurted out, "no she's not."
I thought it looked too much like Chicago to the detriment of an imagined Gotham.
Would I like you when you're angry?Fisticuffs said:I still don't understand. I GET ANGRY WHEN I DON'T UNDERSTAND WAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH
OuterWorldVoice said:Honestly, she looks really, really weird up there. Like a sad faced, slightly spent soccer mom who has been crying because she realizes she'll never be young again and her marriage is a farce. Also, the makeup on her first scene was atrocious. She looked puffy and tired and frankly, kind of melted.
Chichikov said:So yeah, being able to make a half burned former DA who kills peopled based on chance into a quasi-realistic character is a pretty impressive feat, but why bother?
Compared to other Hollywood hotties? Perhaps.OuterWorldVoice said:Good for you. I find her unappealing.
pizzaguysrevenge said:Compared to other Hollywood hotties? Perhaps.
Compared to the general population? Shut the fuck up you lying motherfucker.
Do I need to show you what the average woman looks like?WickedAngel said:Do I need to post the screen cap again?
pizzaguysrevenge said:Do I need to show you what the average woman looks like?
Maggie Gyllenhaal is way above average.Linkzg said:Average. That means not beautiful, no?
pizzaguysrevenge said:Do I need to show you what the average woman looks like?
That is way above average.WickedAngel said:So that's a yes.
![]()
WickedAngel said:So that's a yes.
![]()
pizzaguysrevenge said:Maggie Gyllenhaal is way above average.
Average is the asian lady who works at 7-11 with missing teeth and a cock eye.
Average is that chunky bitch that sat behind you in high school.
Average is the nerdy white girl with a nose that sticks out six inches and has 6 thousand bumps.
That's what average is.
You don't want to know what ugly is.
WickedAngel said:So that's a yes.
Royale with Cheese said:The Joker's line was right about howour society in a nutshell."...they'll eat themselves alive"...
Son of Godzilla said:But he wasn't right. This movie proved that humanity is a caring lot that wouldn't blow themselves up in a bid to stay alive. It PROVED that.
But he wasn't right. This movie proved that humanity is a caring lot that wouldn't blow themselves up in a bid to stay alive. It PROVED that.
Karma Kramer said:I think it goes half and half. Cause Dent certainly proved his point... but the boat thing didn't.
pizzaguysrevenge said:Maggie Gyllenhaal is way above average.
Average is the asian lady who works at 7-11 with missing teeth and a cock eye.
Average is that chunky bitch that sat behind you in high school.
Average is the nerdy white girl with a nose that sticks out six inches and has 6 thousand bumps.
That's what average is.
You don't want to know what ugly is.
But you see, it really doesn't, at least not in an adult way.Royale with Cheese said:This film shows the duality of order and chaos, darkness and insanity, and their relation to each other.
Linkzg said:So now she is not ugly? I thought that was already established.
I think she is average, or slightly above average look broad. Not beautiful, but well above the quo.
I still think the line the line Joker says to her sticks out because of it.
Royale with Cheese said:Very enlightening point...it's the choices of individuals, not the masses, that make the most impact. In most cases.
See, that's the awesome thing about TDK that you really take with you the first time around. Sure, the stunts are great, The Joker's just insane all-around, the ensemble cast was excellent...but the film had more to say than many of us give it credit for, myself included.
I was floored when I left the theater. I had a pretty good walk back in the dark to think things through also. Very awesome flick!
So yeah, being able to make a half burned former DA who kills peopled based on chance into a quasi-realistic character is a pretty impressive feat, but why bother?
Do you really don't understand or are you blinded by rage due to the fact that someone does not share your opinion on a movie?omg rite said:The fuck does that even mean? Stop trying to sound like a professional reviewer douche. You only have half of that down.
TheHeretic said:I think if that line stuck out to you, you have serious mental problems.
Chichikov said:Do you really don't understand or are you blinded by rage due to the fact that someone does not share your opinion on a movie?
If it's the former I can try to explain again, if it's the latter, grow up.
Chichikov said:Do you really don't understand or are you blinded by rage due to the fact that someone does not share your opinion on a movie?
If it's the former I can try to explain again, if it's the latter, grow up.
Royale with Cheese said:It demonstrated it in the context of this story.
Linkzg said:So now having different taste is considered a mental problem. :lol
Whatever helps you sleep at night, kid.
I obviously challenge the story, not the fact that the director followed the script.Linkzg said:It makes sense, so I don't think that is the problem. I think the answer to "why bother?" is because it was included in the script. All there is to it.
reilo said:Oh
my
fucking
god.
Darko said:how many times?
reilo said:Only once, but, if time allows, I'm contemplating multiple views. Maybe even get ahold of IMAX tickets.
TheHeretic said:If in that scene all you could think was "omg MG is teh ugly" and that stuck out as a negative, let me tell you, taste has nothing to do with it. You simply have no idea how to go about watching a movie.
Chichikov said:I obviously challenge the story, not the fact that the director followed the script.
Anyway, it's not even a major issue I have with this movie, it's just an observation.
Not sure why so many people got hung up on this particular line.
Beyond simplistic? Reactionary? Huh?it takes a beyond simplistic and reactionary approach to its subject matter.
Elaborate?It could have been a brilliant action movie, but it's dragged down by misplaced aspiration for a morality tale that just doesn't work, and quite honestly, plays like something out of creative writing 101.
Why bother? Why bother with what? Writing a script and putting an established character from the batman universe in? The director did help to write the screenplay with his brother.So yeah, being able to make a half burned former DA who kills peopled based on chance into a quasi-realistic character is a pretty impressive feat, but why bother?
if you can't understand then you're not as bright as you make yourself sound.Chichikov said:Not sure why so many people got hung up on this particular line.
reilo said:Only once, but, if time allows, I'm contemplating multiple views. Maybe even get ahold of IMAX tickets.
somehow i knew thats what you meantDarko said:I meant how many times did you blow your load while watching the movie :lol