DarthFeanor
Banned
Spider-Man is not an Avenger anyway.
Xbox has stuff?Yup yup! As long as its a PlayStation exclusive no problems with this at all. Xbox stuff BETTER hit PlayStation too!
I really hope MS acquires WB Games Division and makes Batman/Superman exclusive to counter this shit. And according to Jez, MS has indeed put in a bid for them.
no there is uproar from Sony gamers more than xbox gamers in generalThere will be uproar from xbox gamers because they are on the losing end
True. Still disappointing.Nobody is going to lose it, hardly anyone is even talking about this game.
Well, there are more Sony gamers than Xbox gamers to begin with.no there is uproar from Sony gamers more than xbox gamers in general
Well, there are more Sony gamers than Xbox gamers to begin with.
Poor Xbox gamers, ever the oppressed victims, all they have left is to cheer whenever their beloved monopolist corporation buys out studios and publishers left and right, and whine when big bad Sony pays for DLC exclusive deals (often lasting a month or less).
Funny all the celebrations of exclusivity yet when Microsoft do it there uproar lol
Well, there are more Sony gamers than Xbox gamers to begin with.
Poor Xbox gamers, ever the oppressed victims, all they have left is to cheer whenever their beloved monopolist corporation buys out studios and publishers left and right, and whine when big bad Sony pays for DLC exclusive deals (often lasting a month or less).
A classic Sony move. So pro-consumer. Had no interest in the game, but if true, now even less.
I absolutely agree, this shit is always bad.Can you genuinely not see the difference between buying talented developers and funding their games, and paying for exclusivity deals?
One funds titles that wouldn't have been possible. The other adds nothing but a wall for the "others".
Everybody should be against this shit no matter who does it.
I absolutely agree, this shit is always bad.
I do hope you understand that buyouts have far more ramifications than timed exclusivity deals. In one case, partial content is delayed from release in a competing platform, while in the other, future complete games are entirely removed from the competing platform forever, unless there is a clause in the sale that enforces multiplatform releases - which is most likely what Notch included when he sold Mojang.
It's not permanent. Removing a third-party developer is. Permanent impact is worse than temporary impact. There is no argument (like funding for developers that has no bearing to consumers) that trumps this simple fact.Timed exclusivity takes something that everybody was going to have and just stops some people from gaining access. It's a bribe for multi-plat players and fodder for forum dwellers.
Spider-Man is not an Avenger anyway.
It's not permanent. Removing a third-party developer is. Permanent impact is worse than temporary impact. There is no argument (like funding for developers that has no bearing to consumers) that trumps this simple fact.
Of course it's not the same thing, aggressive industry consolidation is much, much worse.
Snowflake for Xbox and Safespace for PC.I think this is a stupid decision unless they have a replacement for the other platforms.
I was not against Playground or Lionhead being bought before them either. They pretty much always worked with Microsoft before, so gamers were not impacted by those purchases.I'd love to see your posts when Insomniac was bought out. I'm sure you were equally against that?
I was not against Playground or Lionhead being bought before them either. They pretty much always worked with Microsoft before, so gamers were not impacted by those purchases.
So yes, long de-facto exclusive relationship makes it A-ok.
You got me, you think?
I hope you mean Warner.Oh yeah, I got you.
That's why you're against a potential Bluepoint buyout, right?
I really hope MS acquires WB Games Division and makes Batman/Superman exclusive to counter this shit. And according to Jez, MS has indeed put in a bid for them.
I hope you mean Warner.
Yes, a Warner buyout that makes third party multiplatform games become exclusive to one platform I am very much against. Both Sony or Microsoft.
Yeah, I meant Warner, that's why I wrote Bluepoint.I hope you mean Warner.
Yes, a Warner buyout that makes third party multiplatform games become exclusive to one platform I am very much against. Both Sony or Microsoft.
Is this a GaaS? Disgusting, maybe that's why it looks so bad. What waste of time.Hey look, marketing rights for a GaaS game. I thought it was Game Pass that was going to push those types of games. Looks like they are being endorsed by Sony. Paging Mr. Freeman
or they just dont like it when it doesn't go there way and spit their dummy out more than xbox fans?because most people got PS4 and not an Xbox
so because there is more of you its acceptable to whinge about something? funny that how big was the whining over tomb raider?Well, there are more Sony gamers than Xbox gamers to begin with.
Poor Xbox gamers, ever the oppressed victims, all they have left is to cheer whenever their beloved monopolist corporation buys out studios and publishers left and right, and whine when big bad Sony pays for DLC exclusive deals (often lasting a month or less).
Yeah, I meant Warner, that's why I wrote Bluepoint.
Here's an Independent studio, the biggest and most respected remake/remaster/port studio, potentially the only of its kind. They've worked mostly with Sony, but their third party work is massively respected, especially Metal Gear.
I can tell from your consistent arguments that you'd be against locking a unique studio like that down so that they couldn't work their magic on future multi-plat titles. Because ultimately, consumers would suffer at such a move.
Right? Have I still got you?
"Mostly"
(Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluepoint_Games)
These guys are even closer to Sony than Insomniac.
Their last multi-platform title was done 9 years ago. The only Xbox exclusive port they ever worked on was Titanfall for the 360... 6 years ago.
If Sony bought them, it would not be a major loss. No major IPs, and the vast majority of their work has consistently already been done on Playstation.
That‘s only partially true. Sony Pictures owns the movie rights (with them allowing Marvel to use the character in the MCU movies). They lost the rights to the merchandising of the character ages ago and the gaming license was owned by Activision (which has fully returned to Marvel too).Well Spider-Man both in film and video game form are owned by Sony atm so it kinda makes sense.
Let the meltdowns begin
There isn't any. I won't buy it.What's your excuse for why Silent Hill is okay to become a PlayStation exclusive?
He is in the MCU though and this game is more based on MCU than anything else, they just cheaped out on likenesses is all.