Ryse has cloth physics on every character.
There seems to be more popping on KZ and vegetation is no context. That's one area where Crytek can claim massive victory.
You do know it upscales before rendering don't you? Any screenshots are going to be 1080p.
The last trailer was all at 1080p, and the gameplay footage in it was indeed 1600x900 upscaled to 1080p. However, they use very good AA and lots of post processing, so jaggies are a rare sight, and other than a bit of blurryness it doesn't look low res. Now for the cutscenes, they looked almost aliasing-free for the most part, so maybe they do render them in higher resolution and with even better AA. I tried to find the edge to pixel count cutscene resolution, but gave up
Those cherry blossom trees looked pretty awesome in KZ trailer.
I haven't seen any scene were Killzone SF showed that many NPCs at the same time.
No, you keep ignoring the fact that we've seen perfectly seamless transitions between gameplay and cutscenes. Crytek isn't ND.
It does not, sorry. Also rendering? Please tell me you see a difference between Delsin vs Ryse npc.
I laughed.
Not the kind of cutscenes where characters talk to each other, etc. There was such a cutscene in the E3 trailer where your guy talks to his soldiers, and that ends with a typical one second long black screen before gameplay begins, which reminded me of how Uncharted always handled those kind of cutscenes. Then there was the other one with ship wrecking which was all happening in-game obviously, but it didn't have characters giving speech to others, and looked more like how camera in Gears moves to highlight some oh-shit moment.
This is hilarious. You guys remember when DoomBringer was saying AC needed more sparks?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=3477082&postcount=164
Ryse has cloth physics on every character.
There seems to be more popping on KZ and vegetation is no context. That's one area where Crytek can claim massive victory.
Ok, my fault. I checked upscaling of 900 to 1080 with a good algorithm and it gives very satisfactory results. Which is good news for Ryse.
I did, it does.
But until we see them...
Tiny, off-screen footage, lol...i dont know why people use ryse close ups when a ps3 game like beyond have almost similar characters,cutscenes doesnt mean shit,even if they are in engine
look ps3 is more powerfull than the one or ps4..jeez
Watch the trailer again.
Ryse could have massive pop-up problems, Ryse could be crashing every 5 minutes, Ryse could be causing overheating of the console, Ryse could....
Go and buy Beyond, or play the demo. The game looks amazing.
Give me a call when you've found cutscenes that aren't using ingame assets. I'll be waiting.Cuz in game doesn't look as good probably
That's not off screen footage. I know it blew my mind a bit when I found that out. The camera work and filters are crazy sometimes in that game.
you will be surprised,,because i have seen both in person (old builds) and infamous 3 character on screen its the same as cutscenes,when he makes that launch into the sky you can see eveything,way way more impresive than ryse
i dont know why people use ryse close ups when a ps3 game like beyond have almost similar characters,cutscenes doesnt mean shit,even if they are in engine
look ps3 is more powerfull than the one or ps4..jeez
Armor textures don't look too hot...I still can't believe this shot is in-game.
Of course not for the overall scene, but face closeups look better than in Killzone. I mean there's basically no doubt that expressions animate far better in Beyond, but even the skin shader probably looks better if you ask me.
Animation are good, it's the transitions between them that needs some work. Something that obviously isn't a problem in cutscenes. Also the cutscenes use a different camera angle than the gameplay does, giving it a view from the best possible angles.
