Alright, if you mean "think for yourself" as in not buying the game yet, sure, I'm all for that. Think for yourself, watch the actual gameplay, take information from various review, then judge whether to buy the game or not. If you mean "think for yourself" by trying out the game, then what's the point? You bought the game, and it's too late to prevent yourself from getting ripped off.
And you know how everyone thinks, how? Check out Angry Joe's review for an example of someone feeling ripped off with Sea of Thieves.
Uhh, where I was arguing it was a flop? Please do provide a reference. I was just being pedantic - by definition Sunset Overdrive, Recore and QB are not first-party. Is the upcoming Spider-Man first-party for Sony? Of course not, Insomniac remains an independent entity.
Because stop liking thing i dont like
Don't you dare shit on Ryse. That game was an excellent launch title and holds up well to this day.
That's not even an argument against whether to buy the game or not. The game could be free to play, and people should still look at reviews and feedback before spending time on it. I could just say the same thing: "Bro, no offence, but if you can't even afford $60 /month, then I don't think this hobby is for you". "Bro, if you can't even afford $399". It's relative to each person about how affordable a product is, and it can be quite insulting when you talk like that to someone who can't afford $10.
What's your deal? You are obsessed with SoT and attempting to knock down everyone's opinion on why they like. We all get it. You don't like the game. It was understood a million negative posts ago.
Since when has Joe become a well respected reviewer again? I’m sorry, but I don’t let his ridiculous videos change my opinion on awesome games like Sea of Thieves.
My comment you quoted does not only apply to SoT. I think you're too concerned with my criticisms that you completely glanced over that fact.
Well respected or not, every reviewer brings info to the table. You can choose to ignore it, but his sentiment is shared by many, many players.
After reading through the SoT threads, I've seen dozens of posts. Picked the last one you made. Point still stands and so does the question. What is your deal? Seems extremely deliberate and suspect of motive.
WaterAstro
Could you do me a favor and explain why you're so prolific in this particular thread? It's definitely not to bring balance to level out people's expectations. You have the most posts out of anyone and as far as I can tell you absolutely despise the game. And as far as I can tell, you haven't touched it.
I think out of all these new IP's, QB did the best, yet MS never quantified QB's figures, and the developer has since moved on.......Remedy's next title will be multiplat. Moreover, if we put all the data we have on QB it sold just over 200k, but MS has given similar PR to it's best new IP's before, in the case of their last best IP, this was said...
It's still $10. It could be $10 towards buying Far Cry 5, or any game a person knows they are guaranteed to like.
You haven't even played the game? It does matter, especially when you are insisting on trying to dominate all discussions. What's your deal with the anti-SoT campaign you're on? Are you personally invested in the competition because it's coming off as you are.
There is still a "cost" association as the trial requires a credit card. You could start your 14 day trial for Sea of Thieves, or you can do it for a future title. The player should still be getting the information in order to make the choice on whether to play SoT or not because they only get one trial per credit card. The "cost" is the fact that the player will be using up their free trial, not real money. If they use it now, they can't use it later, so they should be sure they are getting their trials worth, they should still look up reviews and feedback.
Game Pass trials are plentiful. If not, $10 for a month is great value. And getting it through Game Pass gives you two xbox copies (via home sharing) and one for PC.
Oh please. Even without the trial, the barrier to entry is at a netflix level where people don't even think twice about it. If you're going to sweat about $10 a month, then you probably have larger concerns going on in your life than video games.
You get all those copies on a gamepass sub? well that put things in perspective relative to the OT's title, as you get two unique players just in one home with a sub. I'm thinking the PC version is tied to your main account, so they would not count that as another unique player would they?
Huge gamble. Ultra consumer friendly and forward thinking.
See, this is why I have to reply to off-topic comments because you guys keep twisting and attack what I say nonsensically.
I don't think they're going to put every new, big first party title on Gamepass, at least not right away. They definitely saw Sea of Thieves for what it is and was willing to make some money off of it by putting it on Gamepass right away. If they are going to put every first party title on gamepass right away, then you could be right. They could lose a ton of money on it because it effectively cuts their profits by a lot going from $60 to $10 (though not directly because that $10 could be more many other games).
They already said they won't be adding content until 3 months after. That's not smart imo.
If there was a PlayStation game like... hmm let's say Driveclub when it launched, then of course people should still do their research and see if Driveclub is worth getting. Driveclub is a great game, but the server issues can't be excused. If they wanted a cool online driving game, they would have gotten ripped off, and that $20 PSN card could have gone towards something else.
There is a cost involve because you used up something of value regardless if you got it free or not, and they can't try out that other game because that other game isn't out yet.
I guess you mean that there is content, but how tolerant we are of its repetitiveness makes it feel lacking, right?
