• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Sega was amazing at naming consoles

The perception of the name Dreamcast has definitely changed over the years. It's was considered terrible when first revealed. I think it's legacy as the little console that could (or at least tried very hard to) has made everything else about it be looked back at fondly (other than the d-pad... I think we all still agree that was nasty).

The same is already happening with Wii tbh... and to be fair, Nintendo were vindicated on this one quite a while ago.



Yea, Xbox One is a bad name as well, no question. I think the Wii U situation though is less due to who buys it (in both cases this will often be a parent buying for the child, whilst a child or gamer will simply know the differences), and more to do with the fact that the new console provided something that could easily be mistaken as an add-on, and also still used Wii Remotes, and overall still looks]/i] like a Wii. The Xbox One doesn't really have anything that suggests it's anything other than a new console. So in a way, it's less the name itself, and more the context that the names were given that makes the Wii and DS lines worse. They're made to be too easily confused with the other devices that share their name.


Yeah that could be. Also I thought after that it's also the first time Nintendo used such a similar name back to back? So that would be a giant problem too
 
Yeah that could be. Also I thought after that it's also the first time Nintendo used such a similar name back to back? So that would be a giant problem too

Nah, Nintendo have a history of it really. NES to SNES for example... or all the different Gameboys. De-emphasizing the "Nintendo" when releasing the Wii made a followup a somewhat different prospect though. Much like how many people don't register the Xbox as a Microsoft device, the Wii was seen much as its own thing rather than another Nintendo console.

Sega tried to do this with the Dreamcast also (to shake the stigma built up from MegaCD, 32X and Saturn)... but everyone knew it was Sega anyway, lol.
 
.. people think Dreamcast is a good name?

Maybe itÂ’s because English isn't my native language, but yes, I think that "Dreamcast" sounds awesome.

Master System, Mega Drive and Saturn are great names too.
Sega had cool names on their arcades as well. Dreamcast was the child of Sega Naomi. Microsoft Xbox was the rich spoiled brat that was jealous of them and wanted to buy their happiness.

Naomi was the child of Dreamcast :P
 
It makes far too much sense to be questioned imo. Prior to the Xbox, DirectX WAS gaming for Microsoft.

I'm not gonna pretend you're wrong. Even single bit of evidence proves you right.

I just don't buy it. Especially with the insane overuse of the letter X in the late 90's.

No PR/MKT department would be using an internal name based one tech even few PC gamers knew at the time. DX was hardly even a standard then. 3do seemingly ascending to the throne. DX7 was a response to that. It wasn't until 9 that the brand was worth anything.
 
Out of all the SEGA console names, the only ones I think are on "cool-tier" are Master System, Mega Drive and Saturn. They sound cooler when you add SEGA on them, like SEGA Mega Drive and SEGA Saturn.

Dreamcast was decent, I guess. Not really as catchy as its older brothers. Cool logo though.
 
Those names aren't exceptionally good except for Dreamcast. I also loved the swirly logo and the boot animation.
 
Recent names are so bland, or downright bad in some cases. WiiU, PlayStation [number], Xbox One, Vita, Ouya. I like 3DS, though.

NX will have a stupid name, mark my words.
 
Naomi was the child of Dreamcast :P

Technically Naomi was born first (1998), so I don't think that works. :P

I'm not gonna pretend you're wrong. Even single bit of evidence proves you right.

I just don't buy it. Especially with the insane overuse of the letter X in the late 90's.

No PR/MKT department would be using an internal name based one tech even few PC gamers knew at the time. DX was hardly even a standard then. 3do seemingly ascending to the throne. DX7 was a response to that. It wasn't until 9 that the brand was worth anything.

Yea, it was at a time where everything was using X. But then, that just kinda also explains why DirectX was called what it was too (beyond X being a wildcard for the various modules it was made up of). It makes sense to call it a Direct X box internally, because that's precisely what it was, a console built on Direct X (8.1 specifically). DirectX was also hardly niche by this time. It had mostly superseded OpenGL in the PC space by the time the Xbox launched (and was becoming the default in many cases years before that due to the Unreal Engine murdering PCs in OpenGL mode at the time).

I assume you mean 3DFX btw? They were long dusted by then (NVIDIA got them good with the TNT2 vs Voodoo 3). Glide was basically a non-factor.
 
The first time I heard 'Dreamcast', I refused to believe it.

To this day I still think it's the most brilliantly insane perfect console name ever.

There won't be any better name than Dreamcast in console history!

When you hear the words "Dreamcast", what's the first thing that comes to mind?

"Dreamcast" is easily the best console name ever. Incidentally, it was the only Sega console I owned while its games were still being released.

RIP Sega

A few good men. Dreamcast is the GOAT console name hands down.
 
Dreamcast is a great name.
Genesis sounds cool.
Wii was post-modern and perfect.
Wii U is barf.
Nomad made sense and felt forced.
Playstation sounds a bit childish.
Saturn feels as random as Sega Jovian but with alliteration.
M2 is kind of beastly sounding.
Gamecube sounds like something from the future I'm not sure I should like.
3DO sounded futuristic.
N-Gage sounded like something from a weird catalog.
 
Technically Naomi was born first (1998), so I don't think that works. :P

uqIQwzg.gif
 
I'll put a "The" in front of the names to make them sound even more omnous and bad ass.

The Master System
The Genesis
The Mega Drive
The Saturn
The Dreamcast

Of these, my favorites are either Master System or Mega Drive. Few things in this weary world of ours deserve still to be called "rad"; but Master System and Mega Drive are pretty rad names.
Genesis and Saturn are two strong sounding words and Dreamcast is an amazing console name and even when I understand why consoles don't want to call themselves something like Master System, they should have been striving to be something like Dreamcast.

Compare those amazing Sega console names with
Playstation - sounds like something an engineer announced to the press before the marketing department could shoot him down
Xbox - Sounds like the project name and, again, the marketing department just let is slide.
Super Nintendo 64 - Sounds like that you have enough brand recognition to honestly don't even care.
Gamecube - Another prototype name.
Wii - Good, simple, fun name. Could be less abstract, but I like the simplicity and good hearted nature of the sound.

In a time where developers waste precious console names just reminding the public that this is the same company that made their last favorite console, I think we should honor sega for what they strived for.
Just think of the children whose consoles were: Playstation, Playstation 2, Playstation 3 and then Playstation 4.
Think of them and weep, NeoGAF.

They certainly were. Saturn did have a cool logo as well. I liked Sega's sudden interest in going through our solar system looking for cool names. If I rememberg correctly the 32X was referred to as "the Mars adaptor", then there was Neptune.

Dreamcast is maybe the most beautiful name for a game console ever (even though PlayStation certainly makes perfect sense it's boring that Sony just keep adding a number, but I understand why).

Xbox is an ugly name to begin with and Xbox 360 doesn't make any sense at all. I like Gamecube, though. Thought it described both the product and the looks of the console perfectly.
 
I kinda like PlayStation. I like Wonderswan too because it just sounds so crappy.

I agree about numbered successors. Boring!

Genesis is the best name though. That's coming from a Brit too.
 
I kinda like PlayStation. I like Wonderswan too because it just sounds so crappy.

I agree about numbered successors. Boring!

Genesis is the best name though. That's coming from a Brit too.
I love WonderSwan too :P So random and unique, like the system itself. Same with SwanCrystal.
 
Seems like a weird case of revisionist history when people are touting Dreamcast or Wii for being good names.
 
i was a bit late to dreamcast name hate as i wasn't really on the internet at the time, but what was it like for people when it was first revealed? i just remember seeing it in rental shops and at toys r us and thinking it was a fucking rad system with a cool name (the logo is great too).
 
i was a bit late to dreamcast name hate as i wasn't really on the internet at the time, but what was it like for people when it was first revealed?

Only article I ever remember reading specifically on it had a headline that read something like "Sega has a promising new console; it just needs a real name." Basically argued that "Dreamcast" didn't have anywhere near the punch or cool factor as "Saturn" or "Genesis" and sounded much more like a silly toy.

"Katana" (the project name) may have been a little corny, but it was certainly less weird.
 
Megadrive is the GOAT IMHO.

Sega is a bad name though: it literally means masturbate in Italy. Or skipping school, sometimes.
 
The public reaction basically ranged from "muh revolution" to "Playing with our Wiis? Seriously?"

http://web.archive.org/web/20060430184311/http://www.penny-arcade.com/images/2006/20060428.jpg
I know what the initial response was, I was here back then.

But that response has nothing do with whether Wii ended up being a good and successful name or not. Of course such an outlandish and different name resulted a huge backlash but Nintendo knew that beforehand and took the risk anyway. It was supposed to be a different and strange name because the whole concept of the console was new and different. It reflected that and from a historical standpoint, the whole branding of Wii from name to everything else was very successful.
 
Now the question is: what was the best logo?

4EqSvR1.jpg


It's the blue one
I had a blue one and didn't know about colors those days. One day I saw an orange one and I thought it's a chinese Dreamcast rip-off ! lol
I found out an interesting thing about PAL logo now. A german company called Tivola had a very similar logo to orange dreamcast and Sega had to change DC's logo, so they made it blue in europe!

S8WqNo.jpg
 
I know what the initial response was, I was here back then.

But that response has nothing do with whether Wii ended up being a good and successful name or not. Of course such an outlandish and different name resulted a huge backlash but Nintendo knew that beforehand and took the risk anyway. It was supposed to be a different and strange name because the whole concept of the console was new and different. It reflected that and from a historical standpoint, the whole branding of Wii from name to everything else was very successful.

Stockholm syndrome, yo.
 
Saturn is quite weak IMO, it doesn't translate anything to me (but the logo is nice at least).

The rest are really cool indeed.
 
Dreamcast is easily the best name for what the console stood for. The fact that many of the first games for the system were super colorful and ran at 60 fps made you feel like you were dreaming. I think as far as creativity and accuracy, the Dreamcast just makes so much sense, more than any console has been named before. Instead of trying to be cool with names like the Saturn and Mega Drive, the Dreamcast just was cool without trying to hard and I think that's why it was a generally badass system.
 
I like all the Sega names except Master System. That one just doesn't sound like a video game machine. The rest all have the right mix of evocative and fun, even Mega Drive which sounds like a game feature like limit break or beserk mode.
 
I like all the Sega names except Master System. That one just doesn't sound like a video game machine. The rest all have the right mix of evocative and fun, even Mega Drive which sounds like a game feature like limit break or beserk mode.

IIRC, "Master System" wasn't even the proper name for it initially. I believe there were distinct "Sega System" and "Sega Master System" SKUs early on: same console hardware, but bundled with different games or peripherals. Then for some reason the SMS moniker just stuck.
 
Gotta disagree. Maybe they sound cool in isolation, but at the time they released it just served to confuse consumers.

Mega Drive/Genesis: These are good. Genesis is especially good because it implies the start of something new (Master what?), an alternative to Nintendo. Mega Drive sounds like some sort of mech, but mechs were in (and still are!).

CD: Ok so it plays CDs, got it. Pretty straight forward. But is this a new console? Oh it's an add on? Is it like more powerful or something? I'm so confused.

32X: Ok so it's got 32 in it, so you know it's more powerful than the 16-bit Genesis. But is this a new console? But you just attach it to your Genesis? Do I need the Sega CD? Does this have CDs? Why did you introduce CDs and then release this thing which doesn't use CDs? Which one should I buy? Screw it, I'm going back to Chrono Trigger.

Saturn: The name tells me nothing. Ok it's a planet. And it also shares the name of a budget car model. What am I supposed to think about? Rings? Something far away? Screw it, I'm going back to Gran Turismo.

Dreamcast: It has "dream" in the name which invokes possibilities and wonder. Dreams have no limits, nor did the DREAMCAST (in theory). I think this is a really good name, and one of the coolest console names ever.

Nintendo surprisingly has had a history of very good console names in comparison:

Nintendo Entertainment System: Entertainment? I NEED TO GET THIS.

Game Boy: You've got "Boy" in there to differentiate the size between the NES and GB. It also plays games! Wow!

Super Nintendo: It's like the NES but SUPER I need it.

64: Back in the day, we didn't talk about no DDR5 RAM or some shit. We talked with bits. To go from 16 bits to 64 bits was an absurd leap in power, so of course Nintendo would show it off (spoilers: it didn't matter actually).

Game Boy Color: Holy shit it's got color all my dreams have come true.

Gamecube: While the Xbox and PS2 had multiple functions (namely playing DVDs), the GCN lacked this feature. Nintendo possibly tried to highlight the fact that their system was for games and ONLY games, but turns out people didn't want "just" games. It was also a cube. At least they were honest.

Game Boy Advance: It's time to move beyond the Game Boy and advance... into the future. Ironic considering it had basically no major hardware features outside of shoulder buttons and more power compared to the GBC. It's like the safest upgrade ever.

DS: DS, dual screens, boom.

Wii: The name invokes simplicity, togetherness, and quirkiness. It's fun to say, and strange to hear, but in a good way. No matter if you think it's cool or dumb, it sticks in your mind. Those original Wii commercials were genius too.

3DS: Remember the DS? THIS ONE'S IN 3D. You know what you're getting.

Wii U: No comment.
 
3DS: Remember the DS? THIS ONE'S IN 3D. You know what you're getting.

Weird how you insist that "Sega CD" is somehow confusing, yet cite 3DS positively. The 3DS actually had a similar problem as the Wii U, where consumers couldn't always differentiate it from its predecessors. ("What's the difference between DS, DS Lite, DSi, 2DS, and 3DS?" "Can they play the same games?" etc.)
 
Top Bottom