• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Should we boycott Shadow Complex?

Oh and boycotting is really stupid and once you realize that your consumer lifestyle has helped fund many horrible things you'll become as disillusioned as I am.

For example, if you have bought a computer you literally supported companies that profit from African slave labor.
 
Ulairi said:
I think as soon as we try to punish everyone we disagree with, the ability for an actual dialog to take places goes away.
I don't think you fully understand. Who is trying to punish Card, and how?
 
Someone should write a spin-off gay erotic novel staring Ender and Bean.

In all seriousness,

Gay marriage is seen as a civil rights issue by a lot of people. Personally, I've yet to hear a valid argument against it, or why it's not a civil rights issue. Invariably, the arguments are hateful or inappropriately religious. Orson Scott Card's comments and actions are bigoted, illogical, and hurtful. If companies decide to hire controversial figures, especially when these people say things that are ignorant and base people, then they should be willing to face the consequences of public ire.
 
Asmodai said:
You get no cookies for guessing which ideology I lean closer to :lol

There are fanatics and irrational people on both sides of the political spectrum. That much is obvious. But the Republicans in the United States have just gone batshit insane since Obama was elected. Half the things they say are objectively false. Any party that lets a fool like Sarah Palin be their standard bearer has clearly lost the pulse of the average person in the US.

Of course I live in Canada, where politics in general are much more to the left.
Blasted separatist!
 
Another not so smooth move from gaygamer.net.
I still think that sexual orientation and gaming have nothing to do together.
If the guy is homophobe, blame him, not a video game.
 
Ulairi said:
I think as soon as we try to punish everyone we disagree with, the ability for an actual dialog to take places goes away. No longer do we agree to disagree, if someone disagrees with me they are not just wrong, but they are evil and a hate monger. I'm pro-gay marriage only because marriage is good for a stable society. There is a high rate of STDs in the gay community and that does harm to a lot of people. Promoting stable relationships (not for the current generation of gay people) but for the long term view of gay people is good. If they see their relationships in the prism that they should meet someone, get married have a family, I hope that the rate of people killing themselves will go down. I disagree with Card. But, I'm not going to punish someone I disagree with. being against gay marriage isn't the same as being in the KKK. If Card was caught funding a group that wanted to do physical harm to gay people that would be one thing. But, not being in favour of gay marriage doesn't make someone evil and worthy of our scorn. It's a disagreement but something that can be discussed and should be debated.

I do not like with the mass adoption of the internet the fact that it is so easy for people to get into an echo chamber. We talk to people who agree with us, we scorn people that disagree with us and then talk about how much better and more "progressive" we are than them. Want to know why it's so loud in political discussions? Because of that very reason. No longer can we agree to disagree.

k

Card has called same-sex marriage a "potentially devastating social experiment" and argued that same-sex marriage is not necessary to ensure equal rights because: "Any homosexual man who can persuade a woman to take him as her husband can avail himself of all the rights of husbandhood under the law."[18] He claims that "gay activism as a movement is no longer looking for civil rights, which by and large homosexuals already have."[19] He also says he is against "changing the word 'marriage' to apply to something it's never applied to."[20]

"The first and greatest threat from court decisions in California and Massachusetts, giving legal recognition to 'gay marriage,' is that it marks the end of democracy in America."

http://www.nauvoo.com/library/card-hypocrites.html

Within the Church, the young person who experiments with homosexual behavior should be counseled with, not excommunicated. But as the adolescent moves into adulthood and continues to engage in sinful practices far beyond the level of experimentation, then the consequences within the Church must grow more severe and more long-lasting; unfortunately, they may also be more public as well.

"Laws against homosexual behavior should remain on the books, not to be indiscriminately enforced against anyone who happens to be caught violating them, but to be used when necessary to send a clear message that those who flagrantly violate society's regulation of sexual behavior cannot be permitted to remain as acceptable, equal citizens within that society."

The day we stop treating dangerous ignorance that outright considers people to be less than they are based on sexual orientation without scorn is the day I fucking hang it up.

It deserves scorn. It doesn't deserve to be censored, if that's what you're asking, but it deserves scorn.
 
NaviLink said:
Another not so smooth move from gaygamer.net.
I still think that sexual orientation and gaming have nothing to do together.
If the guy is homophobe, blame him, not a video game.

Agreed... this entire article is just plain stupid, i say just enjoy the damn game and keep all the other crap out of it including the gay rights stuff, its like where ever you look its slapped in your face now days :D
 
Ulairi said:
I think as soon as we try to punish everyone we disagree with, the ability for an actual dialog to take places goes away. No longer do we agree to disagree, if someone disagrees with me they are not just wrong, but they are evil and a hate monger. I'm pro-gay marriage only because marriage is good for a stable society. There is a high rate of STDs in the gay community and that does harm to a lot of people. Promoting stable relationships (not for the current generation of gay people) but for the long term view of gay people is good. If they see their relationships in the prism that they should meet someone, get married have a family, I hope that the rate of people killing themselves will go down. I disagree with Card. But, I'm not going to punish someone I disagree with. being against gay marriage isn't the same as being in the KKK. If Card was caught funding a group that wanted to do physical harm to gay people that would be one thing. But, not being in favour of gay marriage doesn't make someone evil and worthy of our scorn. It's a disagreement but something that can be discussed and should be debated.

I do not like with the mass adoption of the internet the fact that it is so easy for people to get into an echo chamber. We talk to people who agree with us, we scorn people that disagree with us and then talk about how much better and more "progressive" we are than them. Want to know why it's so loud in political discussions? Because of that very reason. No longer can we agree to disagree.

I agree with you, we should respect the rights of people to hold their own opinions. Card is certainly free to say or do whatever he wants. However, by not purchasing this game, one isn't punishing him at all, they're merely not supporting him. I certainly would not support any act to prevent this game from being sold, just as I won't support Card by giving him money through the purchase of this game.
 
K.Sabot said:
Don't make my video games into politics.

Same went for Resident Evil 5, don't make my video games into a civil rights issue.
Ignignort said:
The game is excellent, you guys should talk more about the actual game rather than the world it is based on. It's obvious a lot of work has been put into this title and it's alot better than some of the rubbish that ends up at retail. We should want MORE games like this.
I see the head-in-the-sand defense force has showed up. What are you guys even doing in this thread if you don't want to discuss the issue?

Odrion said:
why do we discuss politics in a gaming forum

the average age here is like fourteen or something
Odrion said:
Oh and boycotting is really stupid and once you realize that your consumer lifestyle has helped fund many horrible things you'll become as disillusioned as I am.

For example, if you have bought a computer you literally supported companies that profit from African slave labor.
Odrion said:
If you have ever bought a can of coke, you supported a company that murders union leaders.
dude. shut up.
 
Asmodai said:
You get no cookies for guessing which ideology I lean closer to :lol

There are fanatics and irrational people on both sides of the political spectrum. That much is obvious. But the Republicans in the United States have just gone batshit insane since Obama was elected. Half the things they say are objectively false. Any party that lets a fool like Sarah Palin be their standard bearer has clearly lost the pulse of the average person in the US.

Of course I live in Canada, where politics in general are much more to the left.
The people on the left are just as mad. Everyone here feels like they have to pick a team instead of remaining independant and finding out for themselves. I think it's a combination of apathy and just general sloth. Either way, we have the right to be absurd on all levels, spread as much misinformation as possible, aggressively hate all those who oppose our views regardless of how ill informed and narrow they might be and people can rightfully not do any research of their own and take the words of a loon as fact and join a cause they know nothing about. It's awesome. Or in other words fuck yeah!
 
Tobor said:
I won't be purchasing this. I'm debating writing a letter to Epic as well. This is very unfortunate, as I wanted to play the game, but I can't justify putting money in OSC's pocket.

Says the guy who seems to make it his personal mission to defend every single act of anti-consumer douchery Apple is charged with on this forum.

Sure, I'd agree that groups trying to oppress the rights of others is worse than corporate malfeasance, but we're also talking about directly and indirectly. Shadow Complex doesn't directly promote or aid anti-homosexual actions or opinions in any way. You have to start going down the line to find the connection, and even then, it's not really that strong a link.

Personally, I could never impugn something based on such an indirect link. I am currently writing this via my Cablevision internet connection, a fucking foul company. While I don't know the full lineage of where the clothes I'm wearing came from, I know they were cheap (t-shirt and shorts) and were purchased at some mega-store, and thus, quite possibly were made by exploiting some 3rd world citizens. I don't look past this or just accept this as the way things are, it bothers me, but I do try to engage in personal accountability. I would laugh at myself something fierce if I tried to say on the internet that Shadow Complex is worthy of scorn and/or boycott because down the line you can make some vague connection to homophobic behavior even though the product in no way directly supports or promotes that, when I am unfortunately fucking awash in similar connections in my typical 21st century lifestyle.
 
pvpness said:
The people on the left are just as mad. Everyone here feels like they have to pick a team instead of remaining independant and finding out for themselves. I think it's a combination of apathy and just general sloth. Either way, we have the right to be absurd on all levels, spread as much misinformation as possible, aggressively hate all those who oppose our views regardless of how ill informed and narrow they might be and people can rightfully not do any research of their own and take the words of a loon as fact and join a cause they know nothing about. It's awesome. Or in other words fuck yeah!

Your point?

If stupidity was a crime, there would be a prison on every block.

And those who try to pretend that they're above it all and the only impartial ones are the most amusing of all.:lol
 
Odrion said:
People who boycotts a single product or two are hypocrites, whose false feeling of self importance is gain by LITERALLY DOING NOTHING.
It is certainly doing more than copy and pasting their own posts from a few posts above.

And you edited in a period! Good for you.
 
EmCeeGramr said:
Wow, slippery slope fallacy

Just wanted to point out that a few pages earlier, this is precisely the slippery slope I was talking about EmCeeGramr:

EternalGamer said:
I don't think it is completely correct to say there is NO real association between Chair and these views given that this is the SECOND game they have made based on his works. That is clearly not a random coincidence. It's not just a one off where they saw a cool idea for a game and pursued it. Literary licenses for videogames are incredibly rare. For a company to have TWO products associated with a single author is pretty rare (outside of Clancy and Ubisoft).

The concepts of these games clearly doesn't require a literary association but the designers sought out an associating with Card. Twice.
The Drowning Man said:
You don't help to create a wacky, far-right looniverse if you're not a wacky, far-right kook to some extent

Saying that because a company decides to publish works or use a license, that they must somehow endorse the viewpoints!

As you can see, the chain is clearly fucking established in my argument.
 
ShockingAlberto said:
It is certainly doing more than copy and pasting their own posts from a few posts above.

And you edited in a period! Good for you.
I felt the need to be efficient by ending my rant in response to someone. What's your point of this post anyways?
 
Timber said:
I don't think you fully understand. Who is trying to punish Card, and how?

OSC is against gay marriage. The developers and he co-created this universe. He will recieve monies from the sale of the game. We are try to punish him because he has beliefs we disagree with. He has not advocated hate. He has not said that gay people are evil, should be sent to jail. He has stated that he thinks gay marriage will hurt the nation and has given his reasons why.

If OSC advocated hate I would be in favour of not purchasing a game. But, to try to punish a studio and a writer because we have different political beliefs isn't going to change anyones minds. Also, the logic of being against OSC doesn't even work. He lives in Utah and couldn't have voted for or against prop 8. The law was changed because the population of california didn't want it. In fact, many people say because President Obama won so big in California and that black people do not want gay marriage in such high numbers was another cause of prop 8 not working. Should I boycott black people? They DIRECTLY not indirectly in the case of OSC contributed to gay people not being able to get married. Now, since we will boycott black people for being such hate mongers, should I only boycott black people in California or throughout the world. Also, the pro gay marriage groups in California did a horrible job with their message, should I boycott them for doing something that damanged the civil rights of gay people? I mean, did you see how they were trying to counter the prop 8 people? It was down right stupid. I think we need to find everyone who contributed to them and start the lists of boycotts. I cannot support someone in good faith who would have contributed to a group that directly harmed the civil rights of a gay person, in california.

You know what? I think John McCain would have been a horrible President and he doesn't believe in gay marriage either. We need to get the voter rolls and find out everyone who voted for them, because like OSC, they are against gay marriage and other things I believe in!

Unless someone can show me a quote from OSC that he advocates HATE and not just disagrees with a political movement, I think boycotting him will not help anything. I think a much better solution would have been for gaygamer.com to try to actually talk with the name and have a discussion. those, usually do much better in the long run of inacting change.
 
Amir0x said:
Just wanted to point out that a few pages earlier, this is precisely the slippery slope I was talking about EmCeeGramr. Saying that because a company decides to publish works or use a license, that they must somehow endorse the viewpoints!

As you can see, the chain is clearly fucking established in my argument.

Well, it is my understanding that Chair Entertainment created the Empire Universe and they licensed Card to write novels for that universe. So I don't really see how they aren't both responsible for the views espoused in it.
 
K.Sabot said:
Don't make my video games into politics.

Same went for Resident Evil 5, don't make my video games into a civil rights issue.
Well I hope you aren't one of the people asking for videogames to be thought of as a mature artform, because mature issues kind of come with that.
 
Unregistered007 said:
WTF!!!!!!!!!!


cru.jpg

wait, someone got banned for saying they agreed with the card guy?
 
Divvy said:
I agree with you, we should respect the rights of people to hold their own opinions. Card is certainly free to say or do whatever he wants. However, by not purchasing this game, one isn't punishing him at all, they're merely not supporting him. I certainly would not support any act to prevent this game from being sold, just as I won't support Card by giving him money through the purchase of this game.
It's what we unknowingly support when we spend our money that we should really be worried about, not just some random person's opinions. eg. Child labour, etc.
 
Mr.Green said:
:lol :lol :lol

Doing something this dumb is one thing but publicly admitting it on a message board wraps it up in a delicious extra layer of fail.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

Au contraire. This is exactly the sort of thing that needs to be done. This is not a case of someone with extreme views who has been outed. This is someone who has actively campaigned for a section of our society to be denied the most basic of human rights. This kind of right wing nonsense is ignored at our peril. I cannot help but feel that if Orson Scott Card was a vocal racist then most people would be happy to ignore his output. Have I ever enjoyed literature, music or art that was the product of someone with homophobic views? Probably. Would my opinion of that work be tainted if I was aware of those views? Absolutely. Bottom line is that yes, I will be boycotting this game. I encourage any gamer with a sense of social justice to do likewise.
 
Calcaneus said:
Well I hope you aren't one of the people asking for videogames to be thought of as a mature artform, because mature issues kind of come with that.

:lol

The whole "mature" artform thing is so incredibly stupid. Do a bunch of pages on internet forums making up fake controversy for games somehow make the industry or the medium more mature? More worthy to be called "art?"

The people who seem to care so much about what certain people think of their hobby are the ones who aren't mature.
 
No, we have several people who speak out against homosexuality. What's wrong with that banner anyways? There are more hilarious ones that pop up than gay cruise ships.

Oh, and it isn't unlikely that we have purchased games that helped fund someone's salary who donated to a prop 8 organization.
 
Odrion said:
People who boycotts a single product or two are hypocrites, whose false feeling of self importance is gain by doing nothing.

I'm sorry, but some of what you say isn't relevant to the issue at hand. You may be indirectly supporting slavery by buying computers, chocolate etc., but that has nothing to do with OSC's anti-homosexuality and boycotting products he supports or is involved with. You seem to assume that just because an individual feels compelled to boycott a certain product that they perceive as morally unjust that they must boycott all products that perceive as morally unjust. But this isn't true. The phrase "pick and choose you fights" exists for a reason.
 
Asmodai said:
Your point?

If stupidity was a crime, there would be a prison on every block.

And those who try to pretend that they're above it all and the only impartial ones are the most amusing of all.:lol
Well you pointed out that they're all crazy but then went on to talk about how the republicans are especially crazy. Which is incorrect. Both sides spread just as much false shit. Plus your assessment of the people who follow Sarah Palin is off as well. SP stands directly on the pulse of at least 40% of average americans.

People pretending to be above anything at all is amusing. Pretty improbable to disassociate yourself with human affairs if you're human. I wasn't tryin argue mang, just pointin out.
 
Oh/darn..too bad, I was looking forward to the game. Though I'll ask a few friends that are also gay and bought the game to know what they think about it...now.
 
YoungHav said:
I hope threadstarter is boycotting $1 and $20 bills for having slave owning wicked racists on them.

I hope dumbasses dont think Washington and Jackson are still alive and prospering from me spending my 1s and 20s!
 
Odrion said:
People who boycotts a single product or two are hypocrites, whose false feeling of self importance is gain by doing nothing.
This has been addressed several times in this thread, by myself and many others. But instead of reading you feel the need to chime in with an obnoxious series of petulant trollish posts.

We know we're all hypocrites in one way or another. But in your world, people who make a conscious effort to be less hypocritical by being more informed in their purchasing decisions are self-important? What misanthropic bile. We know our not buying something has little effect in the greater scope of things. But a little bit is still better than nothing. Your mentality is that you can't do good in everything you do, so you might as well not try to do any good at all. What a sick fucking way of looking at life.
 
Asmodai said:
:lol

The whole "mature" artform thing is so incredibly stupid. Do a bunch of pages on internet forums making up fake controversy for games somehow make the industry or the medium more mature? More worthy to be called "art?"

The people who seem to care so much about what certain people think of their hobby are the ones who aren't mature.
I just find it wierd that gamers as a whole want gaming to be respected, but whenever people question whether games have racially insensitive imagery or anything like that, people jump up to say "woah, its just a videogame, shut up!".
 
Divvy said:
Well, it is my understanding that Chair Entertainment created the Empire Universe and they licensed Card to write novels for that universe. So I don't really see how they aren't both responsible for the views espoused in it.

Exactly!

I can see why people would be confused though, it's an unconventional arrangement - I thought it was a simple case of loosely licensing a story to give it a 'name' when I purchased it, but further reading has revealed the decidedly murkier truth.
 
woodypop said:
Which was ridiculous and pointless, because according to that logic, everyone is a hypocrite.

I had some general point about acting out on one situation and ignoring others because you know this particular contributor's finacial agenda and yadda yadda, I wasn't exactly being literal if you can't tell, but I'm sure that's gone round and round by now. Focus on the hyprocrite line as if I wasn't excluding myself though.
 
Coins said:
I hope dumbasses dont think Washington and Jackson are still alive and prospering from me spending my 1s and 20s!

So if Card would die in this instant, you would ask to delete this thread? Would it be ok to buy the game then?
 
Timber said:
This has been addressed several times in this thread, by myself and many others. But instead of reading you feel the need to chime in with an obnoxious series of petulant trollish posts.

We know we're all hypocrites in one way or another. But in your world, people who make a conscious effort to be less hypocritical by being more informed in their purchasing decisions are self-important? What misanthropic bile. We know our not buying something has little effect in the greater scope of things. But a little bit is still better than nothing. Your mentality is that you can't do good in everything you do, so you might as well not try to do any good at all. What a sick fucking way of looking at life.

hear hear

You can't have a heap without a single grain of sand.
 
To OP:

Excuse me if my knowledge of American culture isn't up to speed (I'm not American), but in America, don't people have a right to an opinion just as much as you have a right to be homosexual?

Boycotting a game because of someone's (who isn't even very closely tied to the game) opinions is equivalent to boycotting something because of someone's homosexuality.

And I don't think quoting his "reproductive dysfunction" comment really supports your case. From a purely scientific point of view, homosexuality is a reproductive dysfunction. Whether or not that's a bad thing is up for debate, considering how overpopulated the world is. His other comments and actions are definitely inflammatory and insulting, but overall I think you're taking the issue far too seriously.

It's a damn good game, just buy it and enjoy it! I know I did.
 
Top Bottom