What about foveated rendering? The other VR headsets dont support this right? I mean how are you supposed to quickly transfer data that comes from eye tracking from within the headset to the console GPU which renders the image and then sends it back to the headset without using wires?
why not? sony is releasing games on steam. the game already sold what it could why would they say no to more money?
USB-C DP Alt mode has no specific power delivery demands, which is obviously present in this case. The only other difference is the fact that DP Alt mode uses two USB2.0 links which VirtualLink trades for a USB 3.1 Gen2 link. The PS5 SoC's diagram shows two USB2.0 muxed with a 10Gb/s USB 3.1.
quest is compressing to h.264 for link and hevc for airlink to reduce the bandwidth enough that it will fit over 5ghz wifi. Sony appears to not be compressing this far down so it would require wigig 60 ghz.
So it's ok to compare Quest 2 to the old tech PSVR to shit on it but not ok to compare the fresh PSVR2 to the actual Quest 2 ?
The Rift was their other headset BTW. They aren't the Oculus Rift Quest, it's just Oculus Quest.
I'll just get whatever's cheap. Quest 2 is fine for me for several years. I'll probably get Quest 4 or 5.
PC compatibility would definitely be a huge value boost. As would an optional battery for a wireless mode. Though if they are taking a loss on these they might not want to sell any that don't benefit the PS ecosystem.
Bro, it's Facebook... they are carving the Trojan Horse into the normie realm.
holly shit the meltdown lmfao.
And the people that laughed at you
kyliethicc
are some PCMRs... who call themselves "enthusiasts" who would go to war and flip flop these specs all day everyday.
Gaming, meetings, socializing, multi-media.
How can one have something they never had to begin with?
that fool wasn't ever hyped, to begin with, watch is meltdown just because i mentioned the possibility of halyx on psvr 2. weird as hellHow can one have something they never had to begin with?
Concern trolling.
Lol I know right. Yet when the RTX 4090 comes out and offers 3 more fps than the RX 7900 XT in some benchmark they're gonna be like that's worth an extra $500!And the people that laughed at you
Today I learned that HDR, 'true' 4K, 110FOV and OLED, YES, OLED, are "oh just some nice to have features, totes NBD if not"
WOOSAH!
Y'all playing yourselves.
Well the Orange Box made it to PS3 and you even had Gaben himself come up on the E3 stage to announce Portal 2 for PS3.
I mean, who needs HDR color accuracy and the black ranges of an OLED with a wider more realist FOV in well, you know, a device that is supposed to simulate the virtues of reality?
I am trying to give him the benefit of the doubt, but it feels something that he always refers to quest 2 as just "mobile vr". I mean, why keep ignoring that it also works on PC like how the PSVR2 works on PS5.
There’s so much effort to dismiss Oculus’ output of games, i feel like you guys have no fucking clue about their output in the past years.
I mean this literally serves as evidence to prove my point that Alyx on PSVR is pipe dream.
I don't think brightness is a big factor on VR because there's no interference of brightness from outside, and it's not like LCDs are brighter than OLEDs in panels of this scale. Smartphone OLEDs get as bright if not brighter than LCDs nowadays because the latter don't use LED arrays.
patent.nweon.com
Fixed
Couldn't it work on PC with more compression in this case? It would be worse than on PS5, but good enough for those (like me) who would use it primarily on PS5.Probably not going to be compatible. Only the Nvidia 20 series non super cards got a usb c port with the bandwidth capable of doing VR. Unless Sony is using compression, which i’m seriously doubting. If it is compressing to hevc Sony would need to release pc software like oculus has for link/airlink.
VirtualLink - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
what is that?
One wire is at least a bit more manageable than the monstrosity of needing 4 HDMI cables last gen but yeah still Quest 2 having a great holiday is going to kill the market share unless PS5 supply ramps up. Quest 3 can probably beat it spec wise and be 100% wireless. I’ll still maybe get one if exclusives are good enough but otherwise everything 3rd party will be on Quest.
And hell, if they port their 1st party stuff to PC you get it wireless on Quest with a PC if you have a strong one. But that all remains to be seen of course.
Sony or someone else would have to release software that would encode to hevc. We also don' know if the psvr 2 has a chip on board that can decode hevc. It might just rely on the ps5 for all processing while the tracking is obviously done in headset.
It looks like psvr2 is using fresnel lenses which would be incredibly disappointing if it wasn't for this patent that's been filed. Fresnel lenses are cheaper, lighter, and lower profile but glare and godrays are just terrible. this patent seems to suggest they are improving on this:
"
Abstract
There are provided a Fresnel lens and a method of manufacturing the Fresnel lens which can suppress a flare which is generated in an image visually recognized through the Fresnel lens so as to extend toward a center of a lens."
Sony Patent | Fresnel Lens And Manufacturing Method For Fresnel Lens - Nweon Patent
Patent: Fresnel Lens And Manufacturing Method For Fresnel Lens Publication Number: 10641931Publication Date: 20200505Applicants: SonyAbstractThere are provided a Fresnel lens and a method of manufacturing the Fresnel lens which can suppress a flare which is generated in an image visually...
