100% of people will claim it sucks.This is disgusting, I don't think any sane person will defend this practice.
Activision made 3b revenue from microstrans. Thanks to COD players on XBOX and PlayStation.100% of people will claim it sucks.
But 10% will actually secretly support it giving companies humongous microtrans revenue.
Thus, the microtrans trend continues.
Nothing is worse than Xbox charging people $30 to have rechargeable batteries.
Until they start charging 99c per hint. Like phoning the Nintendo hotline back in the day.
The Xbox Controller NOT having a RECHARGABLE BATTERY has to be the WORST ANTI-CONSUMER feature of last-gen (Phil Spencer, GET IN THE FU**ING THREAD!)
How do Xbox Players convince themselves that Microsoft were doing them a favor by NOT adding a built-in rechargeable battery inside their self-proclaimed "bEsT gAmInG cOnTrOlLeR"??? Phil Spencer should be ashamed of his brand and team for doing what they did and should IMMEDIATELY rectify this...www.neogaf.com
Poor guy, Troll thread closed. Here have some food:
The irony of this post is that wasn’t even a MS patent. It was a a Sony one that people memed to make it look like a MIcrosoft one.
close enough
The Xbox Controller NOT having a RECHARGABLE BATTERY has to be the WORST ANTI-CONSUMER feature of last-gen (Phil Spencer, GET IN THE FU**ING THREAD!)
How do Xbox Players convince themselves that Microsoft were doing them a favor by NOT adding a built-in rechargeable battery inside their self-proclaimed "bEsT gAmInG cOnTrOlLeR"??? Phil Spencer should be ashamed of his brand and team for doing what they did and should IMMEDIATELY rectify this...www.neogaf.com
Happy Birthday, famFanboy back to trying to derail the thread
He means if they are not paying for the batteries why isn't it cheaperSo it’s easier to buy the tools and the proper battery online, then it is to go to the store and buy AAs and pop the cover off?
Or buy a play and charge kit?
This has to be trolling now.
There's a tiny problem with your post. It's not a Microsoft patent, it's another Sony patent.
close enough
There's a tiny problem with your post. It's not a Microsoft patent, it's another Sony patent.
Sony patent wants to make advertising more interactive
We all know adverts are a necessary evil, which is why different companies are trying to make them more personalized, more engaging or just plain get rid of them. In a recently granted patent, Sony outlines its ideas for next-gen advertising on network-connected devices -- essentially to make it...www.engadget.com
Sony Patents Playable Adverts With Online Social Hooks | TheSixthAxis
Blatant patent.www.thesixthaxis.com
That's ok, it was a joke post anyway
It's common knowledge that Sony also looked into DRM early on. They just folded and settled for X360 style DRM right away because they couldn't get the same kind of infrastructure that MS had in place. Which is one of the reasons EA and others were overwhelmingly supporting the X1 in the beginning of the generation. It was very fortunate for Sony that consumers rose against it.Reminds me of how Sony was looking at DRM prior to Microsoft getting slammed for it. Sony will always try to hide this kind of thing, to keep their fanboys sucking on that "pure" nip, that only wants the best for their big, strong, mature boys!
It's common knowledge that Sony also looked into DRM early on. They just folded and settled for X360 style DRM right away because they couldn't get the same kind of infrastructure that MS had in place. Which is one of the reasons EA and others were overwhelmingly supporting the X1 in the beginning of the generation. It was very fortunate for Sony that consumers rose against it.
Now that those facts are out of the way, can you please stop projecting your own fanatical impulses?