super funk
Member
super funk said:STOP STEALING MY AVATAR. DUDE GET YOUR OWN!
Cluster bomb cluster bomb cluster bomb!
super funk said:STOP STEALING MY AVATAR. DUDE GET YOUR OWN!
cvxfreak said:A true FF fan will own both DS and PSP. It's as simple as that now.
TheJollyCorner said:I guess after 17 years I can no longer call myself a true fan.![]()
![]()
I think true FF fans have probably disowned the series by nowcvxfreak said:A true FF fan will own both DS and PSP. It's as simple as that now.
TheJollyCorner said:I guess after 17 years I can no longer call myself a true fan.![]()
![]()
Jonnyram said:I think true FF fans have probably disowned the series by now![]()
ethelred said:That's okay, you can stick to the Sony-only ones.
Eteric Rice said:Their fanbase will go where ever the FF games are (though I have to wonder about XIII), it really doesn't matter.
Put it on the cheaper console, more people can buy it. Simple really.
super funk said:STOP STEALING MY AVATAR. DUDE GET YOUR OWN!
Hcoregamer00 said:Boo, is it my fault that I keep coming back after I give them money and they beat me?
ethelred said:That's okay, you can stick to the Sony-only ones.
inthezone said:Because the biggest selling Wii games (Wii Play, Sports) are exactly the opposite of what SE has been trying to achieve with all the mainline FF games.
sure why not.. paying for FF and FF II separately when you can get a cheap ass GBA version that got both games in it (got it for like 10 dollars in the bargain bin like 2 years ago.. )ethelred said:That's okay, you can stick to the Sony-only ones.
inthezone said:Main FF games are known for being technologically advanced in the grafx, productions and storytelling departments. Its what they're famous for.
Its not that simple. It means betraying the core values of what the series stand for, always advancing (in the terms I just explained).
Being released on the best selling console doesnt mean bigger sales. Im sure Halo wouldnt have performed as well as it did had it been a PS2 title or look at RE4 and Killer 7.
Its all about your audience.
Im not saying it cant happen, Im sure SE could WOW us all with a shocking announcement in 3 years regarding a mainline FF game.
Do people still seriously do the "...NOT" thing? Well, I mean, I guess they do, but ought they?MasterMFauli said:Yeah, that´s a great idea.
Make RPGs for a console that already has RPGs, and make minigame-compilations for a console that already has minigame-compilations.
Great way to succeed within competition....NOT.
Eteric Rice said:The PS2 was not the most technilogically advanced system of last generation by a long shot.
Final Fantasy was once on Nintendo systems. Hell, the top 10 charts for the DS should show you that people will buy S-E games on a Nintendo system.
In all honesty, Square-Enix would make it look good on any system it's released on. Hell, if they can make decent looking games on the PS2, they can do it for the Wii.
TheJollyCorner said:I gotta hand it to you, pal... you never, ever give up the fight, do you?![]()
TheJollyCorner said:I gotta hand it to you, pal... you never, ever give up the fight, do you?![]()
Eteric Rice said:The PS2 was not the most technilogically advanced system of last generation by a long shot.
Final Fantasy was once on Nintendo systems. Hell, the top 10 charts for the DS should show you that people will buy S-E games on a Nintendo system.
In all honesty, Square-Enix would make it look good on any system it's released on. Hell, if they can make decent looking games on the PS2, they can do it for the Wii.
Come now, don't act like the difference between the PS2 and Xbox is anywhere near the same as the difference between Wii and PS3.Eteric Rice said:Not when someone tells me that Final Fantasy games are on the most powerful systems, when obviously the last generation tells us that that is false.![]()
Eteric Rice said:Not when someone tells me that Final Fantasy games are on the most powerful systems, when obviously the last generation tells us that that is false.![]()
wait a secondTheJollyCorner said:I gotta hand it to you, pal... you never, ever give up the fight, do you?![]()
Segata Sanshiro said:Come now, don't act like the difference between the PS2 and Xbox is anywhere near the same as the difference between Wii and PS3.
exactly. Ps2 was Squares playground last gen and the XBOx blew that system away visually. PLUS it had a HArddrive :lolEteric Rice said:The PS2 was not the most technilogically advanced system of last generation by a long shot.
Final Fantasy was once on Nintendo systems. Hell, the top 10 charts for the DS should show you that people will buy S-E games on a Nintendo system.
In all honesty, Square-Enix would make it look good on any system it's released on. Hell, if they can make decent looking games on the PS2, they can do it for the Wii.
Segata Sanshiro said:Come now, don't act like the difference between the PS2 and Xbox is anywhere near the same as the difference between Wii and PS3.
maybe PSP Vs. DS..?Segata Sanshiro said:Come now, don't act like the difference between the PS2 and Xbox is anywhere near the same as the difference between Wii and PS3.
farnham said:wait a second
- he debunked your technological argument
(since the PSone was clearly weaker thent he N64 and the PS2 was weaker thent he GC or Xbox as well)
- he made an argument about sales.. which is pretty much undeniable..
so yeah your argument does not look so strong now does it..?
Which ends up meaning nothing more or less than they have always been on the best selling system. Until now.Avalon said:Okay, they are always on the most powerful, viable system.
Eteric Rice said:No, I'm not. But it's an RPG... It's Final Fantasy for God's sake. You know? The game that is made of cut scenes? :lol Cut scene games don't require that much power.![]()
I think you actually just forgot the big news of the thread you're posting in.farnham said:maybe PSP Vs. DS..?
right, sorryTheJollyCorner said:why are you calling it my argument? He was responding to inthezone... :lol
pay attention, chuckles.
Eteric Rice said:No, I'm not. But it's an RPG... It's Final Fantasy for God's sake. You know? The game that is made of cut scenes? :lol Cut scene games don't require that much power.![]()
Eteric Rice said:Not when someone tells me that Final Fantasy games are on the most powerful systems, when obviously the last generation tells us that that is false.![]()
Eteric Rice said:No, I'm not. But it's an RPG... It's Final Fantasy for God's sake. You know? The game that is made of cut scenes? :lol Cut scene games don't require that much power.![]()
that post with your psyduck avatar make a very nice combo.Y2Kevbug11 said:please stop talking, christ
Eteric Rice said:![]()
:lol
:loldai said:
ethelred said:Do you even play modern Final Fantasy games? I don't think you do...
kpop100 said:what does his avatar have to do with the fact that you're talking from your ass
Eteric Rice said:Uh, yes, I have played modern Final Fantasy titles. Couldn't get all the way through XII, it was a pain.
Anyway, what annoys me most is that because the Wii is the weakest of the three, people act like it shouldn't get any epic titles. That's absolute bull to me.
\
TheJollyCorner said:Not true.
It's getting SADNESS.
That explains the TBC at the end of the 20th anniversary video.Nif said:Haven't seen this posted yet.
Apparently, guy on the right in the Dissidia logo looks like Amano's Chaos from FF1.
![]()
FF1 sequel? :lol
Check again soldier. Nothing so far indicates Dissidia is part of FFXIII.The Eatable Arab said:anyone who wasn't expecting PSP to get a FFXIII title was just wishfully thinking after shane's hints
Nif said:Haven't seen this posted yet.
Apparently, guy on the right in the Dissidia logo looks like Amano's Chaos from FF1.
![]()
FF1 sequel? :lol
TheJollyCorner said:Not true.
It's getting SADNESS.