Man-is-Obsolete
Member
More interesting to me is how has Halo held up with concurrent users in the face of BLOPS3, FO4, and Battlefront?
This thread is turning fucking ugly. Yeesh
Maybe it'd help but that certainly didn't stop the CoD decline after those games dropped basic PC features.
Could sales (discounts) be related to that retention? As a new-ish PC gamer I'm more likely to to wait and buy at discounts. You mentioned Civ V, I've never played a Civ game but have almost bought it a few times because it's on discount often and heavily. I've built up such a big back log for so cheap that I have no interest in playing the new iteration until I get through the last game, and slay some of my backlog dragon.It think it's rather simple at a high enough level of abstraction:
PC gamers overall are statistically less likely to move immediately (or sometimes, at all) to the next iteration of (more or less) the same thing. You see this in everything from huge FPS franchises to even sales of direct indie game sequels. It gets more fuzzy when you try to explain why this is the case, but it surely has something to do with library size/longevity and perpetual compatibility.
CS:GO is an extreme example of course (it's ridiculous how huge it has become, and its growth curve is very unusual), but there are also e.g. more people are playing BF4 and BF3 on PC right now than on any other platform. And Civilization V is still in the top 10 most played games on Steam 5 years after its release, despite a newer game in the franchise existing.
I don't really see this as either a "bad" or a "good" thing. It's just a different market.
Completely unrelated to the above, but since I looked at them for this thread, the overall concurrent numbers for SWBF across all platforms are a bit lower than I would have expected. Maybe FO4 just gobbled up too much of the market this month with its ridiculous sales.
So you are saying, 50,000-60,000 extra concurrent players would not happen if this game was on Steam? I find that a bold statement to make. I think it would, just for the convenience of it being there, and if it is there one click away, it makes it much easier to try out the game that reviewed lower than what would trigger you to go to Origin for.
I agree about the F2P, and $10 CS.
If you take an average over the day PC is not the most played platform for those two titles. Although having a lower total of unique players in the case of BF3 it certainly has a higher retention rate.CS:GO is an extreme example of course (it's ridiculous how huge it has become, and its growth curve is very unusual), but there are also e.g. more people are playing BF4 and BF3 on PC right now than on any other platform.
DOTA 2 and CS feels like the same games from the early 2000s. It might as well be a remastered CS 1.6
Yeah. Good lord, what has happened here.
I can't even get the game to install correctly on my PS4, keeps saying Corrupted file?
I get a corrupt symbol for the disc icon, but I just put in Dead pool from gamefly and it installed fine?
I tried rebuilding the data base, reinstalling 3.11, powered it off, clean boot.
I can't figure it out and see other's online having the same issue.
Do I just put the disc in and wait? Does the corrupt symbol go away after 20gb patch?
More choices cause discernment? Mate I don't think you understand the word as you've placed two independent variables in a causal relationship.They are more discerning though, this doesn't even have to be about their personal tastes. I can prove this simply by pointing out the PC is a buyers market. Where consoles often don't need nor care to be. There's a veritable cornucopia of games on PC comparitively to console. This is important because the average PC player has a wider variety of titles in their library than most console players. So it doesn't really matter if they are smarter or not, they simply have more options and that often is all it takes to make someone more discerning.
I wonder if this thread will go how i think it will.
Standard Sales thread for GAF
To imply that PC gamers make better decisions than console players is stupid.
More interesting to me is how has Halo held up with concurrent users in the face of BLOPS3, FO4, and Battlefront?
is there a halo number count?
is there a halo number count?
is there a halo number count?
Pretty funny destiny is ahead of halo. I expected fallout to be ahead absolutely thoX1 has a "Popular Game" list which Im pretty certain is a live version of Major Nelson's old Xbox Live activity lists. Past few days I've looked Battlefront, BLOPs, Fallout, and Destiny were above Halo.
Pretty funny destiny is ahead of halo. I expected fallout to be ahead absolutely tho
I wouldn't say they make better decisions but seeing that the user base is younger for console players, you can definitely say it's not the same type of market.
I have no problem making that statement. Steam is not the be all end of all of PC gaming, although it is a huge factor in sales. The main thing is that the game is simply not good enough. It would likely carry a mixed rating on Steam and along with a pricetag of 60 dollars, I can't see it doing gangbusters. I mean it would definitely be the top seller for a few days, but do we really think it would do better than Black Ops 3 on PC? I don't think so. If it were F2P or cheaper than a normal priced game, sure.
That is what happens when somebody plays the pc master race card.
PS4 MASTER RACE
You've got to be kidding me. Literally in the first page:
FWIW I work in education research, specifically technology-based education research, around a lot of young kids (12-18). Overwhelmingly, they are gaming on PC's, and they are playing F2P titles and/or Minecraft. I'm not so sure that the 'consoles are for kids, PC's are for grown ups' stereotypes fit as well as they once did. Obviously I can't get into the specifics of our dataset - but the kids very much indicated that they played Smite, DOTA2, CSGO, TF2 and iOS games. Pure console gamers were very much outliers.
Obviously, take all of this with a grain of salt. But, yeah. My experience of young people's engagement with gaming is very different to the one you're describing.
The beauty of PC is that origin is one click away as wellI dunno man. I think with over 12 million active users on Steam, and this game easily accessible with one click if it were on there, I think people would impulse on it just on the merits of graphics alone, to see how it looks on their rig and I think easily make 50-60,000 active users on top of the 40K+ on Origin at this current point.
But this is something we will never know, since EA wants their own platform.
The beauty of PC is that origin is one click away as well
No worries, I find it interesting too and obviously I'm just saying this from my point of view having done promo work for video games in hyper markets, media shops or even Paris Games Week.
The beauty of PC is that origin is one click away as well
Yep - and I'm not minimising that. Just offering an alternative perspective. I read a lot of people commenting on the demographics across platforms, who will swear up and down that erudite gentlemen use PC gaming to escape the throngs of screaming children on the consoles - this is largely not reflected by the data, which suggests that younger audiences are very much engaged with PC gaming; not system building or performance rigs, but F2P, freemium, and low-resource titles.
More choices cause discernment? Mate I don't think you understand the word as you've placed two independent variables in a causal relationship.
That is what happens when somebody plays the pc master race card.
You've got to be kidding me. Literally in the first page:
No they don't. How much time you spend has nothing to do with sound judgment. Sound judgment is quality that is possessed irrespective of the pool to be selected. The fact you think 2 independent variables are in a causal relationship reflects poorly on your judgment.So when people are given more options to choose from, you're saying they don't tend to spend more time attempting to pick the best option?
I dunno why some many people think Origin is the devil,.
I dunno why some many people think Origin is the devil.
Low numbers overall, regardless
Yes, new experiences, like Counter-Strike.
His exact quote was:
I was just pointing out that is hilariously rich considering a game like Star Citizen 'exists'.
Except it's not one click. It's 60 dollars. That alone with a low meta critic and possibly negative steam listing is enough to keep it from an impulse buy.I dunno man. I think with over 12 million active users on Steam, and this game easily accessible with one click if it were on there, I think people would impulse on it just on the merits of graphics alone, to see how it looks on their rig and I think easily make 50-60,000 active users on top of the 40K+ on Origin at this current point.
But this is something we will never know, since EA wants their own platform.
Yup Payday 2 does so well on Steam despite introducing shady P2W while being arrogant about it.To imply that PC gamers make better decisions than console players is stupid.
I wouldn't say they make better decisions but seeing that the user base is younger for console players, you can definitely say it's not the same type of market.
We're doing the Sony Christmas campaign right now and most Battlefront games sold are for PS4 and bought by parents for their young ones. Wether the game is good or bad is no concern to them as they just want a Star Wars game for the kids to play.
I'm still playing PC BF4 and none of the big games released lately.
I'll pick up Fallout 4 in a few months when bugs are ironed out more and some good mods are out. I was interested in SWBF but it seems too aimed at the mainstream for my liking after playing the beta. And the newest COD is always a no-no for me.
I've also actually started playing Starcraft 2 sp in the hopes to get good enough for the mp.
I didn't play for the past 3 days and suddenly spawn camping is a thing on hoth? Is this just the effect of the masses unlocking the jump pack? Mad dudes chilling on the rocks around the first Imperial spawn.
I don't think anyone can deny that the markets are different though. I think people often look at headlines like these and jump to uninformed conclusions about the state of PC gaming.To imply that PC gamers make better decisions than console players is stupid.