NYCmetsfan
Banned
Vader is in it
vader is a sith
Vader is in it
Galen is the key to all this.
I just hope Gareth Edwards has figured out how to direct human actors. I'm sure he'll do a great job with the Death Star's motivation, but the people, who knows.
I just hope Gareth Edwards has figured out how to direct human actors. I'm sure he'll do a great job with the Death Star's motivation, but the people, who knows.
Shouldn't there be a good chance Vader makes an appearance in this movie?
I think ANH to Jedi is 4 years, but your totally right.Well that sounds freaking great
1-It explains the Death Star construction time discrepancy, as the Geonosian Prototype had to be perfected, thus giving us the 20 years of construction vs the 2 years (?) for the second one
2-The empire guy trying to atone for the horror he created sounds very damn interesting.
I´m in.
This is the funniest thing I've read all week.
And also the truest.
I don't know...........does Disney like money?
I'll take a Dash Rendar cameo , let him exist Disney
Pls
I'll be on the look out for this, it'll be interesting , that's for sure
But what will happen to the Clone Wars canon of "Tarkin really liked the design of this prison he was in one time"?
Put him in the trailers or try to keep it a surprise? How do you write Vader into a movie and his character just not take over the whole story?
Death Star II is so funny. Like why wouldnt the Emeperor just build another one?
Of course in the trilogy it's lame tho
watch Monsters
I'm really hoping this film is the last SW film to deal with any variation of the Death Star.
watch Monsters
It took them 20 years to build the first one. The second Death Star is destroyed a few years after the first one and was fully operational. No way they started work on it after the first one blew up. That shit was being constructed already while the first one was being finished.
Anyway, weird choice of story. This will be the second straight Star Wars movie that features a defection as its plot catalyst if this is true.
Have my doubts with this movie because the director made a really giant tease of a film that falls apart on the second viewing and his other, Monsters, I haven't watched.
How many death stars does one need?
How many death stars does one need?
How many death stars does one need?
What if Galen survives, and is Max Von Sydow in VII?
How many star destroyers does one need? They had the resources and they wanted to expand their reach as far as possible. Seems like overkill to me too but whatever.
Monsters is even worse if you hate what he was trying to do with Godzilla.
On the other hand, this is probably way different than those two so who knows? Both those movies had some nice things going on visually to say the least.
Someone forgot Return of the Jedi.The Death Star's only function is to blow up planets. In space combat, it's pretty much useless. It just kinda sits there. It can't fire it's beam at spaceships (or at least has never demonstrated the ability to) and besides that only has defensive weapons. It obviously costs a fortune and takes tens (hundreds?) of thousands of people just to maintain. Unless in the very unlikely scenario you need to blow up more than one planet at the exact same time, I don't see why you'd need two. The empire has never been smart when it comes to making super weapons though.
Not going to happen if these early rumors are true. According to the visual art books Sydow's character has been a Jedi worshipper and an explorer for most of his life.
Oh, so the story of the many dead Bothans getting the Death Star II intel isn't one that needs to be told? Bothans don't matter?
Oppenheimer didn't say that, he quoted it. I was drunk and reading about nukes last night thanks to North Korea.
There's also whatever the braintrust at Lucas Arts.
Fourth... ROTS had some jedi turn, I forget his name. AOTC had Dooku turning on the Jedi Council though it happens before the events of the movie so I'm not sure we can count it or not.
Because Lucasfilm was not under orders to make a Star Wars film every year.Why was Lucasfilms so timid about making Star Wars films before Disney?
Hopefully the new canon can find room to fit this in.Well do you want to see a female Bothan?
Someone forgot Return of the Jedi.
The Death Star's only function is to blow up planets. In space combat, it's pretty much useless. It just kinda sits there. It can't fire it's beam at spaceships (or at least has never demonstrated the ability to) and besides that only has defensive weapons. It obviously costs a fortune and takes tens (hundreds?) of thousands of people just to maintain. Unless in the very unlikely scenario you need to blow up more than one planet at the exact same time, I don't see why you'd need two. The empire has never been smart when it comes to making super weapons though.
Yeah, you were right though haha.Oh shit you're right. I forgot about that part. I still maintain that it's not a very effective offensive weapon when it's not taking out planets. Rewatching the battle, it looks like it can only take out bigger ships and not X-Wings.
Lucas Arts hasn't been a thing for a very long time now, and even if they were, they do video games, not movies.
Any chance these anthology films might spin off into multi arc installments? Think of a Han Solo trilogy, or a 2 parter in the same spirit as Avengers: Infinity War?