I wonder if it will look like console or look like pc tower or maybe htpc.
I see a headcrab when I look at it. Even made a picture. ;-;
Gaben pls.
The living room is getting awfully crowded!
This seems important:
Hmm.
Interesting announcement. I'll probably pick one up at some point so I can play some of the games that never make it to console.
I also wonder how a $400 steambox compare to ps4 performance wise.
I also wonder how a $400 steambox compare to ps4 performance wise.
1. I can already hook up my PC to my TV and play.
2. I can already play a game with my 360 for windows game pad.
3. I don't use steam as a friends list or community.
4. Basically 1 and 2, I don't want to buy a new piece of hardware just so I can bypass windows.
None of this is convincing me to not buy a Xbox or PlayStation in the next generation. I already have a PC. Your fan base is based on PC gaming. I don't think this will work out.
Although I can see why they haven't announced Half-life 3 yet. Can you say exclusive?
If it is released a year later, it could well be significantly more powerful at the same price.
Right now, I wouldn't really expect performance parity with a PS4 for anything less than 600$... And that would be the best case scenario.I also wonder how a $400 steambox compare to ps4 performance wise.
I'm not sure this thing is really meant for those games though. I mean, there's PC gaming, and then there's PC gaming. And if you're looking for PC gaming then you'd probably be much better served by sitting at a desk and using a keyboard/mouse.
Don't get me wrong, I love my Steambox build, but most the stuff I play on it are superior versions of games already found on console. There are a few rare exceptions, like Outlast, though.
This certainly has be intrigued but I'm not satiated on existing details. I've been on the ledge in terms of investing into a modern gaming PC but I'm not sure of Valve's vision and whether it's in line with future purchase decisions.
This certainly has be intrigued but I'm not satiated on existing details. I've been on the ledge in terms of investing into a modern gaming PC but I'm not sure of Valve's vision and whether it's in line with future purchase decisions.
See I was wondering this myself, as I'm from the UK. I did a quick scan through the T&C and no where does it state you have to be in the US.Can the lucky 200 live in europe because usually these things just select people from the good ol us of a and I'm SOL.
Can we expect Valve's own machine to be subsidized?
Just build your own computer. Cheaper that way and you get to choose the OS.
Where are people getting this $300 or 400 mid-tier thing from?
$300 would be some pretty dated shit, and even $400 won't run highest setting on newer games at 1080p with solid frames.
$600+ would build a solid box I'm sure...
and if you're talking "pre-built" add at least $50 or so to the component price.. plus controller, etc... no freaking way a $400 box is gonna be good.
Hopefully we will now have a good set of ways to turn on the computer remotely. Finding a system that will due that for your desktop is a pain in the ass and trying to integrate it with a Harmony Remote is even worse.
Loosing interest in this pretty fast.
Ill try out the SteamOS but thats it.
Right now, I wouldn't really expect performance parity with a PS4 for anything less than 600$... And that would be the best case scenario.
It should be pointed that it would be silly and short-sighted to think that a SM could be a good deal just at a price-performance parity with a PS4, considering how cheaper the software is going to be.
Then again, being short-sighted and very bad at math is a quite common issue for the general audience, so that could be a problem for Valve, in terms of communication.
Probably already posted.
![]()
400 box that is on par if not craps on current consoles is totally doable.
If the valve takes a hit on each unit and if they get cozy with the hardware manufacturers and get good prices.
Well, Steam sales and free online are some upsides over the long run. But it still boils down to pricing and specs. They needed to at least give some examples or should have waited until they were prepared to do so. As the market they appear to be targeting are going to have two new familiar consoles launching in November. Besides that, they are going to be confused as it is when they see all of these different spec configurations and prices.
Realistically speaking, most people will just buy a PS4 or Xbox One and call it a day. Nothing will change. They will see the Steam Machines with 5 different pricing models and specs that they barely understand, and then the familiar Xbox and PlayStation brands that will probably end up being cheaper when it comes to specs vs price. Where do you think most will lean?
I mean, this is really the ideal PC gaming solution for me on the surface, but not if the cost is going to be higher for similar or slightly better specs than a PS4. It still does not solve the problem of why people like me prefer consoles anyway. If I wanted to buy a pre-built PC and then install the Steam OS, I can already do that. They need to show me why I should want one of these and it is really disappointing that they have failed to even try thus far.
as far as I understand it, this is for the people who want their steam experience in the living room and onto multiple devices. this is not meant for people who already settle with consoles, and or people who already have high end PC's.
Well, Steam sales and free online are some upsides over the long run. ...
I'm kind of starting to look at the Alienware X51 again. Is the £600 one good value? I wouldn't want Win8 with it obviously so it's probably overestimated anyway.
Alienware is never a good value. Don't let anyone try to tell you differently.
They are extremely overpriced, low warrantay, sub-par specs for the cost, and use low-quality parts.
There is a thread on GAF where they discuss the X line of Alienwares and it is just plain crazy in there. They spend $1500+ dollars buying one of these and then a new GPU that fits, its insanity.